Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-21-2008, 02:04 PM
 
Location: In my view finder.....
8,515 posts, read 16,181,348 times
Reputation: 8079

Advertisements

Let's say you become involved with someone that has signifigant financial assets. Not a whole lot, be enough to where they have no financial worries or concerns.

They had their assts before you became involved. They want to protect their assets and ensure that they are not wiped out in the event of a divorce.

Would you be offended if your spouse asked you to sign a pre-nup?

Edit: One person has assets and the other does not.


PS: Notice I did not say he/she. It could be either or doing the asking. The gender is not important.

Last edited by Ron.; 11-21-2008 at 02:14 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-21-2008, 02:07 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,144,437 times
Reputation: 46680
No, particularly if she had children. I think that would be a reasonable precaution in that event. I would, however, want some financial assurances in case I were the wronged party during a divorce.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2008, 02:10 PM
 
Location: Coachella Valley, California
15,639 posts, read 41,031,245 times
Reputation: 13472
No, not offended. We have a pre-nup because each of us individually has assets that need protection. It was mutually agreed upon between us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2008, 02:13 PM
 
Location: In my view finder.....
8,515 posts, read 16,181,348 times
Reputation: 8079
You adding variables to the equation. They have assets and you don't.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Twinkle Toes View Post
No, not offended. We have a pre-nup because each of us individually has assets that need protection. It was mutually agreed upon between us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2008, 02:16 PM
 
Location: Coachella Valley, California
15,639 posts, read 41,031,245 times
Reputation: 13472
If I had nothing and he had a lot, I would maybe be hurt that he wanted to exclude me, but being the reasonable person I am, I would realize that he worked for those assets and I am not entitled to them. However, I would make certain that in the event of a divorce or death I was entitled to something. You should NEVER sign a pre-nup without having your own legal counsel to consult with.

Last edited by Twinkle Toes; 11-21-2008 at 02:55 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2008, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Happiness is found inside your smile :)
3,176 posts, read 14,699,183 times
Reputation: 1313
Not at all - I'd be happy to have MY lawyers take a look at it and make some changes for my favor.

Most high powered men also have a more frequent occurance of infidelity. And you betcha it would be in there as a safety net - just like Catherine Zeta Jones...if you even TOUCH another woman, I get all the money - prick!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2008, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Brentwood, TN
8,002 posts, read 18,603,683 times
Reputation: 12357
Yes I probably would. We both started with nothing and built everything together. What the hell was there to protect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2008, 02:24 PM
 
Location: In my view finder.....
8,515 posts, read 16,181,348 times
Reputation: 8079
Mona,
In this situation one of you has assets and the other does not.


Quote:
Originally Posted by MonaLisaVito View Post
Yes I probably would. We both started with nothing and built everything together. What the hell was there to protect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2008, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
17,029 posts, read 30,917,993 times
Reputation: 16265
I would hope not. With the rate of divorce these days you almost have too for protection. I've seen too many folks lose their retirement savings to a former spouse who doesnt work or works part time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2008, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Brentwood, TN
8,002 posts, read 18,603,683 times
Reputation: 12357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron. View Post
Mona,
In this situation one of you has assets and the other does not.
No, I would not sign one. I take my vows seriously first off and secondly, I don't take what is not mine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top