Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-09-2010, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,848,652 times
Reputation: 14116

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred314X View Post
See how quickly people get upset? It was just a study; one man's opinion.
It's just more proof of man's origins.

Just in case there be any doubts, here's a short home video of the one and only CD Religion Forum regulars get together a couple years back. I'm second from the right, chilling with a tall cold one.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIj4U2KLdn0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-09-2010, 01:42 PM
 
30,902 posts, read 33,057,982 times
Reputation: 26919
I agree with the study. As one poster here said, it should be self-evident, really, since we can see what we'd immediately and assuredly call morality in many, many social animals. Indeed, it is for the purpose of our all being able to get along; there being strength in numbers, being societal can have its pluses and this is how we, along with various other creatures, evolved.

We don't necessarily *not* kill because we *want* to not kill. (Oy, Grammar Police, please don't shoot me.) Rather, we generally don't kill because it's been ingrained in us from a very early age that it is wrong...because teaching that to each generation ensures our continued survival as a group. And seemingly, at least at a glance, paradoxically, we *will* change that morality and kill someone (or some group -- i.e., in war, or in capital punishment) if that person is *more of a threat* to society than the repercussions of obviously going against a "commandment"...if that makes sense. Same with societal animals, who can and will oust "criminals" from the group or, if the crime is bad enough, tear them apart then and there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2010, 02:02 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,105,600 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerZ View Post
And seemingly, at least at a glance, paradoxically, we *will* change that morality and kill someone (or some group -- i.e., in war, or in capital punishment) if that person is *more of a threat* to society than the repercussions of obviously going against a "commandment"...if that makes sense.
It makes perfect sense when you consider the mental and theological summersaults that Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas performed to formulate the concept of the Just War.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2010, 10:24 PM
juj
 
Location: Too far from MSG
1,657 posts, read 2,636,234 times
Reputation: 335
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
The fact that morality has evolved along with our own evolution...
Morality is as constant as the speed of light. It's how individuals and thus society changes their will to adhere to morality that changes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 11:02 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,784,262 times
Reputation: 9728
I just read an article on chimp children. It was not about morals, yet it was interesting as it showed that we are much closer to chimps than we think. It said that in experiments primate girls (in both chimps and rhesus monkeys) prefer to play with dolls and plush animals, while almost all males prefer to play with toy cars

It is also common for chimps to play with wooden sticks. Here too there is a gender difference. Chimp girls use sticks mostly as a symbol of their own children that they don't have yet. They carry the sticks with them wherever they go, including their nests when they sleep. Similar to human girls and dolls or plush animals. As soon as they have their own babies, they no longer carry sticks around.
Chimp boys on the other hand mainly use such sticks as toy weapons or when looking for ants. Chimp girls use them that way, too, but never the same stick that they use as a symbol of their own babies
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 11:05 PM
 
Location: Murfreesboro (nearer Smyrna), TN
694 posts, read 746,547 times
Reputation: 346
This is jut another way of trying to get rid of the world's religions (or at least their power) and make the whole worlk secular.

Charles Sands
Smyrna, TN
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 11:19 PM
 
Location: OKC
5,421 posts, read 6,512,118 times
Reputation: 1775
I wish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 11:36 PM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,089 posts, read 20,793,492 times
Reputation: 5931
Whatever the advantages or disadvantages, it seems that this line of research is showing that morality is based on evolved behaviour. Not god - given rules.

Morality is relative even in religion. It changes often and drastically. Moral absolutes is a fiction. What I predict will come out of studies like this is a branch of evolution called social evolution (can't you just hear the theists screaming 'social engineering! Darwinist eugenics! Pol Pot!') and the result would be to develop the fairest and most tolerant social system we can, rather than try to push outmoded ideas of 'The moral compass' or 'God - given moral absolutes'. They should go in the bin along with Jonah's whale and Matthew's star.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2010, 11:06 AM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,848,652 times
Reputation: 14116
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpsTN View Post
This is jut another way of trying to get rid of the world's religions (or at least their power) and make the whole worlk secular.

Charles Sands
Smyrna, TN
This is just another way to answer the "big questions" that our world's religions have failed to answer adequately.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2010, 11:47 AM
AFH
 
28 posts, read 44,833 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpsTN View Post
This is jut another way of trying to get rid of the world's religions (or at least their power) and make the whole worlk secular.

Charles Sands
Smyrna, TN
Right, right.

Because primatologists are in on the conspiracy...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top