Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-05-2010, 09:58 PM
 
1,131 posts, read 1,713,799 times
Reputation: 286

Advertisements

Wow.....interesting report:




Quote:
"I do think that human morality didn't start from scratch -- human morality started with the primate psychology which has all these tendencies of reciprocity and empathy and following social rules and so on...so we took that psychology and we turned it into a moral system," he {eminent biologist Frans De Waal} said.
Quote:
"I'm not sure that religion is at the root of morality because I personally think that morality probably existed long before we had religions," De Waal said. "We are very much group animals, we want to fit in the group, we are interested in the community life that we are part of and so we will contribute to it ... all these tendencies that are important for morality."
He argues that we evolved to be moral, that humans, like primates, are group animals and groups that work well together tend to survive.
Famed Biologist Frans De Waal Argues Humans Inherited Morality From Primates, Not From Religion - ABC News

Last edited by Bo; 12-06-2010 at 09:24 AM.. Reason: Moved from San Antonio forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-05-2010, 10:13 PM
 
3,669 posts, read 6,880,235 times
Reputation: 1804
I agree that morality was a trait that was developed as an evolutionary advantage. We still need social mechanisms to impart and regulate this trait. Religion, community, and family units were excellent mechanisms for this. As we have seen the break down of each we have also seen a decline in morality across society.

We need to replace these things if they are no longer feasible but without replacements society will suffer. Secular humanism is a wonderful alternative for older religions though. We still need community and family and have to find our way back to them as being important features of a well functioning society.

Religion in general also provided ritual and spirituality. Two things we need to remain healthy and balanced. If one does not find religion and church as ideal vehicles for these in their life they also need replacements for both instead of just totally discarding them.

At least that is my view which is still partial to spirituality, faith, and religion though I do believe the UN WHO would agree to a great extent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 04:43 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,070,009 times
Reputation: 15038
"Study Says Humans Acquired Morality from Primates, Not Religion"

While I fundamentally agree with the study, I have a problem with the title because we humans are still primates. The fact that morality has evolved along with our own evolution, and that some degree of morality (social mores) can be detected amongst other higher mammals, I would think makes the findings rather self-evident.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 05:13 PM
 
Location: Boise
2,008 posts, read 3,328,525 times
Reputation: 735
The statement that morality can only come from religion is a bit asinine considering that all societies have moral codes, of which most facets overlap (find me a society where murder and theft are allowed). Yet not all societies share the same religion. This alone should be proof that societies and more specifically human beings themselves are the authors of morality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Sierra Nevada Land, CA
9,455 posts, read 12,554,277 times
Reputation: 16453
I guess that would explain much.

I am glad that we have moved beyond animal based morality. Thank God for a higher law:
http://web.missouri.edu/~flinnm/courses/mah/lectures/groupliving.htm

Infanticide
Hanuman langurs have a puzzling behavior. Adult males kill infants. For primatologists, the research problem is: why do males go to the trouble of killing infants? Here are some hypotheses and their predictions:
Hypothesis

Predictions
Population Control: To control their numbers, langurs kill infants. This prevents overpopulation which threatens group survival. (Good-for-the group)

Infanticide should occur when population density is high. It should not occur when population density is low.

Competition for Resources: Males kill infants to make more resources available to their kin and descendants.
Infanticide should occur when resources are scarce. Infanticide is less likely to occur when resources are plentiful. Also, males do not kill their own kin or offspring.

Cannibalism: Males kill infants and consume them as food.
Males should be observed to eat infants they kill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,709,355 times
Reputation: 9980
Morality is a function of control:

You can only have sex if you are married and you can only be married by the Church.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 07:38 PM
 
1,743 posts, read 2,160,905 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr5150 View Post
I guess that would explain much.

I am glad that we have moved beyond animal based morality. Thank God for a higher law:
http://web.missouri.edu/~flinnm/courses/mah/lectures/groupliving.htm

Infanticide
Hanuman langurs have a puzzling behavior. Adult males kill infants. For primatologists, the research problem is: why do males go to the trouble of killing infants? Here are some hypotheses and their predictions:
Hypothesis

Predictions
Population Control: To control their numbers, langurs kill infants. This prevents overpopulation which threatens group survival. (Good-for-the group)

Infanticide should occur when population density is high. It should not occur when population density is low.

Competition for Resources: Males kill infants to make more resources available to their kin and descendants.
Infanticide should occur when resources are scarce. Infanticide is less likely to occur when resources are plentiful. Also, males do not kill their own kin or offspring.

Cannibalism: Males kill infants and consume them as food.
Males should be observed to eat infants they kill.
Ironic considering your Bible god absolutely LOVED infanticide. It was one of his choice methods of inflicting terror and wrath on those who failed to kowtow to him and/or his chosen people.

So much for that "higher law", eh?

Last edited by QuixoticHobbit; 12-06-2010 at 07:48 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 08:58 PM
 
Location: Sierra Nevada Land, CA
9,455 posts, read 12,554,277 times
Reputation: 16453
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuixoticHobbit View Post
Ironic considering your Bible god absolutely LOVED infanticide. It was one of his choice methods of inflicting terror and wrath on those who failed to kowtow to him and/or his chosen people.

So much for that "higher law", eh?
So where is it written that we are to kill our babies?

Please look up the definition of infantcide before you babble.

***********
And please stick to the topic of the OP.

What's with the hate of God and religion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 09:03 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,070,009 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr5150 View Post
I guess that would explain much.

I am glad that we have moved beyond animal based morality.

Thank God for a higher law:
Have we, I'm not so sure?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 09:37 PM
 
7,077 posts, read 12,354,425 times
Reputation: 6449
Study Says Humans Acquired Morality from Primates, Not Religion

Personally, I think primates have higher moral standards than Humans. Humans drop bombs on each other. Primates just throw their poop at each other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top