Just looked at part of that astounding video by "Dr" Donn Chapman, who actually does not hold any related or even actual Doctorate. His guest does, but then that guy goes on to claim that popular pro-Evolution media gets their foot in the door of young children's minds, far too early, thus (OMG!) "influencing" their thinking with erroneous stories about dinos far pre-existing humans.
Not that the Church would EVER try to influence young kids' naive minds with biased and scientifically illiterate versions of everything, huh? You know, like in Sunday School? With those absurd comic books showing a lion and a lamb peacefully co-existing? (Now... don't lie to me: I used to attend Sunday School. I used to be a Christian!!)
Let's continue with a semi-short critique, shall we? I'll be Bawhk!
_______________________
Ah yes; he just
had to intro the famous Acambara dino drawing stones. Well, too large a subject, but one I was actually personally involved in since my old real university alma mater would age those stones for me via inarguable X-Ray Fuorescence testing methods used on stone. Not only that, Creationist supporters used C14 dating to establish these stones as being from the time of man, while the sad little fact is you can't use C14 on inanimate objects, thus this was just another EPIC FAIL from the git-go! .
Well anyhow, oddly (!!!) the righteous but tourista-oriented Town of Acambara would not send to me even one teensy little test sample. Not one of the 4 (as I recall) town officials that I tried to call, and e-mailed ever responded back to me. Why? They don't want the obvious truth out there; t'would kill their golden tourista egg for sure!). It's also now well known that the originator of these stones actually paid the locals to make them up in their little mud huts.
Dino Drawings for Dineros, si? Sorta, in a way, does prove [fake] dinos and humans did co-exist, I'll have to admit...)
Back to our fascinating and educational video, but in the meantime, take a look at this modern animal:
http://images.search.yahoo.com/image...mb=S9I.UWuJaIc
Yup; a modern small wing-membraned reptile. Oh My Gawd, huh? Is this
therefore a dinosaur, technically? Yep. Could be called that but those big-ol' macro ground-rattling versions? Nope. No such evidence. They were long gone millions of years prior to even our oldest hominid ancestors.
Then our good Dr. Fubbar (er... sorry: Hubbar...) goes on with some
very assumptive comments where he quietly
conflates some old historical observations from a guy who investigated American Indian cave art with the simple
"Thus these dinosaurs we see here" commentary. Right out of the blue! Anyone else catch these errant conflations? Probably not, esp. if you're entranced by the whole idea and just want to go believe it!
Well OK, let's do one more. Shouldn't take too long to find the next one. Then I'm outa here.
____________________________________
Yep. Like I said; that didn't take too long. He then go on to quote the originator of dinosaur research, a British Paleontologist, and the narrator notes his comments about how well engineered the Brachiosaurus' vertebrae were. But then, in a single sentence that narrator assumes (
ADCs, remember?) that this
HAD TO BE designed, not evolved. Why again? This clearly shows 1)they have
no idea how Evolution actually works, but that, when in
AWE of anything, always default to God and Intgelligent Design.
I so wish one of these
ADC clowns would come to our town and have an open debate with me and a few of my colleauges. It would be an intellectual & fact-refining blood bath just on the readily avaiable facts alone. When I'd then
prove: the validity of the various methods of aging & dating, and then the geological column that does not lie, and then that absolutely no Dino DNA has EVER been found, and then that no mass Noah-like floods could have
ever happened, and then that the conveniently local Washington Lake Missoula flood lands
(the flood scablands as we call them) are confirmed results of
many (I thnink they day at least 24 was it?) catastrophic ice-age melt scenarios from literally millions of years ago, where exactly would such
ADC "conclusions" be left? Why.. high and dry of course.
So: do your science reading homework kidz! There
will be a content and skills test in the morning, but remember: no assumtions allowed in your answers! And no AWE-inspired conclusions either.
That we'll happily leave for those kids who also believe in The Easter Bunny and Santa. And co-existing dinos...
ADCs. Yah gotz tah luv'em, huh?
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Would you believe Dinosaurs and Humans coexisted if there were evidence?
Some heartfelt questions and comments...
