Creationists: Does your god have nipples? (church, bible, quote, faith)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,943,087 times
Reputation: 4561
Advertisements
It is a scientific theory (which means a fact) that all humans start off as females in the womb, and it is with the development of testosterone that those females change into males. Of course the moment of conception determines what the eventual sex will be, however, it is obvious until about 60 days afterwards. Until that time, the development is essentially the same for the embryo.
So, creationists, seeing you think a male was created first, why the heck would it have nipples? Supposedly it did not go through the female embryonic stage.
And on that subject, why would your god have nipples? After all, was that first man not created after "our image"?
I hate to see a forum with this much potential waste time and energy debating such trivial irrelevancies. Why would we even ask such a question until we've settled the issue of whether or not he has a belly button?
It is a scientific theory (which means a fact) that all humans start off as females in the womb, and it is with the development of testosterone that those females change into males. Of course the moment of conception determines what the eventual sex will be, however, it is obvious until about 60 days afterwards. Until that time, the development is essentially the same for the embryo.
So, creationists, seeing you think a male was created first, why the heck would it have nipples? Supposedly it did not go through the female embryonic stage.
And on that subject, why would your god have nipples? After all, was that first man not created after "our image"?
The white bearded old guy in the sky concept is so 1432. You do need to read up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert_The_Crocodile
I hate to see a forum with this much potential waste time and energy debating such trivial irrelevancies. Why would we even ask such a question until we've settled the issue of whether or not he has a belly button?
Funny that you brought that up. The belly button has been discussed in church circles and the answer is clearly no. Ask yourself this; what causes a belly button? If you don't know, ask your wife. If she doesn't know, ask your doctor.
I hate to see a forum with this much potential waste time and energy debating such trivial irrelevancies. Why would we even ask such a question until we've settled the issue of whether or not he has a belly button?
I think you need to prove he is real, before you start dressing him up
It is a scientific theory (which means a fact) that all humans start off as females in the womb, and it is with the development of testosterone that those females change into males. Of course the moment of conception determines what the eventual sex will be, however, it is obvious until about 60 days afterwards. Until that time, the development is essentially the same for the embryo.
So, creationists, seeing you think a male was created first, why the heck would it have nipples? Supposedly it did not go through the female embryonic stage.
And on that subject, why would your god have nipples? After all, was that first man not created after "our image"?
I dont believe we all start as females, then suddenly change.
I know a male was created first because my bible tells me so. I dont care if he had nipples or not.
I dont care if God has nipples. Hes God, it wont matter in the end. <3
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,943,087 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohky0815
I dont believe we all start as females, then suddenly change.
You don't have to believe, but it is a medical fact. Until 60 days, only female characteristics are visible on the fetus, and the male ones only start developing once testosterone starts to kick in.
Why would you NOT believe a medical fact?
Quote:
I know a male was created first because my bible tells me so. I dont care if he had nipples or not.
I dont care if God has nipples. Hes God, it wont matter in the end. <3
Your bible also tells you to stone your kids for not listening to you. When are you going to start?
You don't have to believe, but it is a medical fact. Until 60 days, only female characteristics are visible on the fetus, and the male ones only start developing once testosterone starts to kick in.
Why would you NOT believe a medical fact?
Your bible also tells you to stone your kids for not listening to you. When are you going to start?
When the contest is between reality and faith, reality always loses out. Such is the very nature of faith, where all problematic and unpleasant evidence is summarily rejected.
It is a scientific theory (which means a fact) that all humans start off as females in the womb, and it is with the development of testosterone that those females change into males. Of course the moment of conception determines what the eventual sex will be, however, it is obvious until about 60 days afterwards. Until that time, the development is essentially the same for the embryo.
So, creationists, seeing you think a male was created first, why the heck would it have nipples? Supposedly it did not go through the female embryonic stage.
And on that subject, why would your god have nipples? After all, was that first man not created after "our image"?
Cupper,it appears you might had a tad bit too much egg nog
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.