Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU
Nonsense. You've crafted a rather corrupt rationalization for petty oppression of those who are "other". It violates the most basic principle of morality, the ethic of reciprocity, and you apparently don't realize it.
Even the language you use highlights the abject depravity of that for which you advocate. If you, yourself, do not relish the prospect of being "swept back into the corners" then that should have informed you of the indefensible moral bankruptcy of suggesting that that be visited on anyone else.
|
You may not like it. You are probably even afraid of it. I understand that, But it is not corrupt. I chose "swept back into the corners" to see if you can handle it. I could use softer words, but the end would be the same. My claim may be cold, as in cold hard facts, but to claim it is in anyway "moral bankruptcy" or that it is "indefensible" is lame.
No, my morals include everybody. I don't do "make me feel good morals" to plead special cases. I listen to the case itself. Like that poor Gorilla. You have to understand that every choice we make causes harm to innocent people. So I ask you again, who, in your opinion, is the largest group of innocent people hurt by the choices we are making?