Ken Ham's Opening Day at the Ark. #FAIL only 4000 show up. (preach, ancient)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As usual,you are playing the gambits of '100% proof' and 'Were you there?' Which are fallacies. Specifically fallacies that enable you to ignore the evidence. And the evidence points strongly to what is or is not possible in terms of housing all the kinds of animals, feeding them, survival in a devastated world and global distribution. You lost most of those debates on the feasibility with me, never mind Bill Nye and you now simply forget all that and deny everything. As usual.
As you did on the Evolution debate and the Temple debate. Everyone knows this, probably even Vizio, who is no mean practitioner of denial himself, when it comes to it. You are in no position to criticize Bill Nye or anyone else who argues on evidential feasibility.
Have a nice weekend. I'm sorta done with this thread until some new figures about attendance come out.
Go visit the volcanic cinder cones yourself.
There might be something of interest for you here: http://biblicalgeology.net/blog/
I fail to see what the Giant's causeway prves, and if only you troubled to research, you'd see the argument from river beds in hard rck were debunked. As usual you merely sling links to Greationists garbage sites at us as Evidence without knowing or caring what the evidence really is.
You are now worth to us 2 divisions, a Panzer regiment and a catering corps.
As usual,you are playing the gambits of '100% proof' and 'Were you there?' Which are fallacies. Specifically fallacies that enable you to ignore the evidence. And the evidence points strongly to what is or is not possible in terms of housing all the kinds of animals, feeding them, survival in a devastated world and global distribution. You lost most of those debates on the feasibility with me, never mind Bill Nye and you now simply forget all that and deny everything. As usual.
As you did on the Evolution debate and the Temple debate. Everyone knows this, probably even Vizio, who is no mean practitioner of denial himself, when it comes to it. You are in no position to criticize Bill Nye or anyone else who argues on evidential feasibility.
Have a nice weekend. I'm sorta done with this thread until some new figures about attendance come out.
Fact is that Bill Nye is a shill and makes money by towing the party line which is whatever is contrary to the Bible makes money for him. I saw his debate and his stupid statements about the ark. How a so-called "scientist" could make statements like he did just shows how stupid and whaco the guy actually is and people who follow him are the same type of people who follow big time wrestling.
I fail to see what the Giant's causeway prves, and if only you troubled to research, you'd see the argument from river beds in hard rck were debunked. As usual you merely sling links to Greationists garbage sites at us as Evidence without knowing or caring what the evidence really is.
You are now worth to us 2 divisions, a Panzer regiment and a catering corps.
Evey bit of which was debunked by me. Repeatedly.
And that was denied by you.
Repeatedly. Everyone saw that clearly. You are now worth two divisions, a Panzer battalion (mechanical problems), a catering corps and a latrine orderly to us.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eusebius
Fact is that Bill Nye is a shill and makes money by towing the party line which is whatever is contrary to the Bible makes money for him. I saw his debate and his stupid statements about the ark. How a so-called "scientist" could make statements like he did just shows how stupid and whaco the guy actually is and people who follow him are the same type of people who follow big time wrestling.
That's good coming from someone who cites Creationist garbage sites where they don't know what they are talking about. At least Bill Nye does.
Btw. This link explains the Rivers in hard rock arguments. Grand Canyon (a Creationist favourite) but it applies generally.
Not only that but the cinder cones of former volcanoes had to have had all the debris around them washed away by the flood of Noah's day. Neither wind nor normal rain fall even for billions of years could have washed that away leaving just the cinder cones.
A cinder cone is a type of volcano not the end result of them.
Evey bit of which was debunked by me. Repeatedly.
And that was denied by you.
Repeatedly. Everyone saw that clearly. You are now worth two divisions, a Panzer battalion (mechanical problems), a catering corps and a latrine orderly to us.
In your wildest dreams.
Quote:
That's good coming from someone who cites Creationist garbage sites where they don't know what they are talking about. At least Bill Nye does.
Btw. This link explains the Rivers in hard rock arguments. Grand Canyon (a Creationist favourite) but it applies generally.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
