Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Can I just tweak that Bro! ... The problem is that such evidence is not verifiable and evidence that cannot be verified is absolutely useless - as evidence.
Every action that we take, has a reason. Our reasons to have a "Faith" may vary from person to person, but there is always a reason why someone has faith.
So having faith, without a reason, is as ridiculous as having faith based on evidence, because by definition, as bUU put it
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU
All faith is "without evidence" by definition. You cannot "have faith" in something for which there is evidence that is unequivocally true. .
Faith without evidence IS faith without reason, so in a sense they are synonymous.
You as an Atheist, and I as a believer seem to have found some minor common ground in the past, but frankly speaking, this, IMO, is the worst answer I have received so far.
It doesn't make sense, both logically and philosophically.
You as an Atheist, and I as a believer seem to have found some minor common ground in the past, but frankly speaking, this, IMO, is the worst answer I have received so far.
It doesn't make sense, both logically and philosophically.
Don't continually blame your inability to understand on other people's inability to properly explain.
You as an Atheist, and I as a believer seem to have found some minor common ground in the past, but frankly speaking, this, IMO, is the worst answer I have received so far.
It doesn't make sense, both logically and philosophically.
Depends on how this is written and/or read."
"Faith without evidence IS faith without reason, so in a sense they are synonymous." which is correct.
I'd say you're 'reading' it as...
"Faith without evidence IS faith without A reason, so in a sense they are synonymous." which is why you object
Ah, the 'beauty' of the English language.
You as an Atheist, and I as a believer seem to have found some minor common ground in the past, but frankly speaking, this, IMO, is the worst answer I have received so far.
It doesn't make sense, both logically and philosophically.
Depends on how you are using the word 'reason', as a noun or a verb.
Depends on how this is written and/or read."
"Faith without evidence IS faith without reason, so in a sense they are synonymous." which is correct.
I'd say you're 'reading' it as...
"Faith without evidence IS faith without A reason, so in a sense they are synonymous." which is why you object
Ah, the 'beauty' of the English language.
Exactly, that is why I am confused.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
