Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-15-2019, 12:21 AM
 
6,115 posts, read 3,089,753 times
Reputation: 2410

Advertisements

What’s the difference?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-15-2019, 03:17 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,707,908 times
Reputation: 8798
All faith is "without evidence" by definition. You cannot "have faith" in something for which there is evidence that is unequivocally true. Rather, in that context what you "have" is "knowledge".

The matter of "reason" in faith became notably significant in the 18th Century. President John Adams is said to have strove for a religion based on a "common sense sort of reasonableness". The man who became the leading minister of that faith in the early 19th Century, William Ellery Channing, preached about "revelation through reason" rather than accepting whatever is written in scripture. He went as far as to dismiss the prevailing religious trend of the day toward Calvinism by saying, 'It is plain that a doctrine that contradicts our best ideas of goodness and justice, cannot come from the just and good God, or be a true representation of his character.'

Decades later, that faith featured people who deliberately sought to establish a reasonable basis for religion, such as Thoreau, who sought that foundation in the natural world, and Emerson, who sought that foundation by coming close to acknowledging that God was the totality of physical existence. Decades after that, that faith evolved further into one that had no place for "faith without reason", going as far as building reason into the tenets of the faith.

Today that translates into both a recognition that spiritual and moral wisdom has no single source, and that all sources of such wisdom must be continually subjected to the crucible of reason. In other words, "Because this book says so," or, "because this person said so," is not only an invalid basis for any claim, putting such explanations forward as basis for a claim is deemed a logical fallacy (argumentum ab auctoritate).

While there were only a couple of faiths that started down that path two hundred years ago (including the faiths that became my faith, Unitarian Universalism), many faiths are heading in this direction, by way of splintering off liberal arms. Many Reform Jewish congregations hold to John Adams' "common sense sort of reasonableness" ethic, as do some liberal Christian churches. As society-in-general becomes less tolerant of "faith without reason", faith evolves to comply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 04:07 AM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,584,564 times
Reputation: 2070
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoCardinals View Post
What’s the difference?
what's diference between a step stool, 6'ft ladder, 10' ladder, and a cherry picker (bucket truck)?

before we use them, what kinds of information are we processing?

when is it clear we have chosen the wrong tool?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 04:17 AM
 
12,918 posts, read 16,867,959 times
Reputation: 5434
Neither type is possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 04:33 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,781 posts, read 4,986,375 times
Reputation: 2114
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoCardinals View Post
What’s the difference?
How are you using 'reason', as a verb (to reason) or a noun (a reason)?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 06:39 AM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,050,479 times
Reputation: 21914
There may be a subtle difference, but does it really matter?

Faith without X seems to be the same thing as faith alone, and faith alone is simply a bad reason for believing something.

Christians and some others seem to advance faith as a virtuous thing, whereas in reality it is more of a negative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 07:57 AM
 
1,402 posts, read 477,717 times
Reputation: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
All faith is "without evidence" by definition. You cannot "have faith" in something for which there is evidence that is unequivocally true. Rather, in that context what you "have" is "knowledge".
[TRUNCATED...]
Nice post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 08:04 AM
 
1,402 posts, read 477,717 times
Reputation: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arach Angle View Post
what's diference between a step stool, 6'ft ladder, 10' ladder, and a cherry picker (bucket truck)?

before we use them, what kinds of information are we processing?

when is it clear we have chosen the wrong tool?
A good start, but you left out one key option, to make this a relevant analogy. FIFY.....

"What's the difference between a step stool, 6'ft ladder, 10' ladder, and a cherry picker (bucket truck)... and a conceptual/theoretical ladder, which cannot be seen or touched or tested or measured or climbed in the same way by more than one person?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 09:22 AM
 
18,250 posts, read 16,924,631 times
Reputation: 7553
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoCardinals View Post
What’s the difference?
Faith without evidence IS faith without reason, so in a sense they are synonymous.

Christians, for example have no evidence their faith is real therefore they must rely on faith without reason i.e. their faith is built on nothing except 2000-year-old words which are like shifting beach sand.

And it's that way for all religions (faiths).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,442 posts, read 12,793,000 times
Reputation: 2497
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrillobyte View Post
Faith without evidence IS faith without reason, so in a sense they are synonymous.

Christians, for example have no evidence their faith is real therefore they must rely on faith without reason i.e. their faith is built on nothing except 2000-year-old words which are like shifting beach sand.

And it's that way for all religions (faiths).
Not true. I have faith in a creator, tho I haven’t seen such physically. I believe the evidence points to a creator, therefore I have faith there is one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top