Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-20-2019, 04:45 AM
 
Location: NJ
2,676 posts, read 1,265,626 times
Reputation: 1290

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
When you have to go to the extreme to make a point (which you admit you are doing), then you probably don't have a very cogent point.
When you can't survive a test of an extreme case, then your position will rely on the subjective "drawing of lines" and no two people will agree on what is extreme and what isn't. If a rule doesn't work at the extreme, then it doesn't work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-20-2019, 04:45 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,831 posts, read 24,335,838 times
Reputation: 32953
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosends View Post
While I admit to taking an extreme example (principles are rarely tested by moderation) I don't think it is equivalent to a non-prayer case. Can you explain why there would be an a priori expectation that a home owners' meeting would have prayer as a necessary ritual practice?
I'm just telling you something that I actually experienced for the last 9 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2019, 04:46 AM
 
Location: NJ
2,676 posts, read 1,265,626 times
Reputation: 1290
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
I'm just telling you something that I actually experienced for the last 9 years.
As am I.

The court cases are now proving that, when push comes to shove, the two freedoms are in conflict. Maybe 20 years ago, or 50, no one thought this extreme would come to pass, so the laws seemed reasonable and reconcilable. But the extreme is now more commonplace, and the test shows that the system is flawed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2019, 04:49 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,831 posts, read 24,335,838 times
Reputation: 32953
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosends View Post
As am I.

The court cases are now proving that, when push comes to shove, the two freedoms are in conflict. Maybe 20 years ago, or 50, no one thought this extreme would come to pass, so the laws seemed reasonable and reconcilable. But the extreme is now more commonplace, and the test shows that the system is flawed.
I don't think you are. Do you make torahs for a living? Did someone want to come in and have one made as wall paper? Is this a sideline from your position as a teacher?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2019, 04:56 AM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,088 posts, read 20,731,784 times
Reputation: 5930
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosends View Post
When you can't survive a test of an extreme case, then your position will rely on the subjective "drawing of lines" and no two people will agree on what is extreme and what isn't. If a rule doesn't work at the extreme, then it doesn't work.
But that's what court rulings are for. Where two sides can't agree, then a judgement has to be made on where to draw the line. This is what negotiation between two sides who can't agree on a compromise is all about and often requires calling in an impartial (or someone who has taken bribes from both sides) adjudicator to come to a compromise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2019, 04:57 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,173 posts, read 26,202,662 times
Reputation: 27914
Another bad analogy.
If one prints the Torah as a book and does not make wallpaper, the request can be easily and legally refused.
More pertinent would be if you do routinely print the Torah as a wallpaper, then you would discriminate if you wouldn't sell it to a Christian or atheist, for instance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2019, 05:00 AM
 
Location: NJ
2,676 posts, read 1,265,626 times
Reputation: 1290
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
I don't think you are. Do you make torahs for a living? Did someone want to come in and have one made as wall paper? Is this a sideline from your position as a teacher?
No, which is why I wrote "hypothetically."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2019, 05:01 AM
 
Location: NJ
2,676 posts, read 1,265,626 times
Reputation: 1290
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSPONDER View Post
But that's what court rulings are for. Where two sides can't agree, then a judgement has to be made on where to draw the line. This is what negotiation between two sides who can't agree on a compromise is all about and often requires calling in an impartial (or someone who has taken bribes from both sides) adjudicator is called in.
But that's the heart of the problem. Court rulings have to reconcile two laws which create this tension, and have to figure out, case by case, which freedom is more persuasive. That means that in any case, one freedom will be lost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2019, 05:02 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,831 posts, read 24,335,838 times
Reputation: 32953
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosends View Post
No, which is why I wrote "hypothetically."
Which is why I'm saying that your post # 53 is a misrepresentation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2019, 05:03 AM
 
Location: NJ
2,676 posts, read 1,265,626 times
Reputation: 1290
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
Another bad analogy.
If one prints the Torah as a book and does not make wallpaper, the request can be easily and legally refused.
More pertinent would be if you do routinely print the Torah as a wallpaper, then you would discriminate if you wouldn't sell it to a Christian or atheist, for instance.
But one does not print the torah as a book. One writes it by hand to be a ritual object.

Interesting other hypothetical. What if a Jewish owner of a grocery store refuses to sell non-kosher food to a Jew because he is religiously forbidden to facilitate a Jew's breaking of Kosher eating laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top