Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
...How could anyone deny that a 36-foot tall human giant once walked like the sound of thunder on the planet?..
Only those ignorant of world history can deny such truths, for many ruins of ancient cities which were built by giants, are spread around the tebel/globe/world.
There are ancient tablets from Sumer -Babylon- which depict 25-30+ foot tall giants compared to 'normal' sized human beings depicted on the same tablets. Lions depicted on the same tablets are as small dogs, in size comparison to the giants. Num 13:33 And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, [which come] of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.
Goliath and his brothers were descended from Anak, who was a nephillim =offspring of fallen sons of God and daughters of Adam, who did the same thing after the flood as the chained angels did before the flood.
By the time of Goliath, the Anakim had "devolved" to the smaller size of Goliath and his brothers.
I've taken some classes at Montana Tech and have seen very large detailed maps that reveal the strata.
Where? Give us real life pictures, proofs of the existence of such geologic columns exactly as they are charted in the fairy tale books of evolution. Who visited them and documented them? When? What is their qualifications for declaring them to be true geological columns, stacked up exactly as the fairy tale evolution books stack them up? Where did they go to school? And what are their philosophical world bias', and how did that cause them to see/interpret the evidence which they claim proves their bias'?
Yet another bull crap creation site...Lying for Jesus. Do all you creationists lie? Everyone I've ever run across does...Lies, fakes and frauds do not do anything for your credibility.
In July 2008, Baugh was in contact with Alvis Delk and James Bishop, who claimed to have found a dinosaur-human print fossil. Bishop is a convicted murderer and Delk has a history of selling faked artifacts. Baugh bought the "fossil" from Delk who used the money to pay his medical bills. On the authenticity of the claims, reporter Bud Kennedy noted, "since no scientists were involved, about all we really know so far is that the museum has a new rock." Biologist PZ Myers critiqued Delk's "fossil" saying Baugh "is falling all over himself praising the authenticity of this blatant fake."
Do you actually think Baugh will allow this hoax to be tested?
Well again sanspeur, you make claims without any links. Could you please give us the link that reveals that Delk has a history of selling faked atrifacts? How do you know it is a hoax sanspeur? What evidence do you base that on? And why would any scientist be involved? We can't get any scientest to even look at the El Toro figuriens that were discovered 60 years ago. And the link I provided you shows the fossil under a CT scan that reveals the compressions around both foot prints. So that rules out anyone useing a chisel to carve our the foot prints. They could only be made by a foot pressing down in soft mud.
Well again sanspeur, you make claims without any links. Could you please give us the link that reveals that Delk has a history of selling faked atrifacts? How do you know it is a hoax sanspeur? What evidence do you base that on? And why would any scientist be involved? We can't get any scientest to even look at the El Toro figuriens that were discovered 60 years ago. And the link I provided you shows the fossil under a CT scan that reveals the compressions around both foot prints. So that rules out anyone useing a chisel to carve our the foot prints. They could only be made by a foot pressing down in soft mud.
I have already given you a lot of links on his "discovery" being a fake, you just choose to ignore them.
Well again sanspeur, you make claims without any links. Could you please give us the link that reveals that Delk has a history of selling faked atrifacts? How do you know it is a hoax sanspeur? What evidence do you base that on? And why would any scientist be involved? We can't get any scientest to even look at the El Toro figuriens that were discovered 60 years ago. and the link I provided you shows the fossil under a CT scan that reveals the compressions around both foot prints. So that rules out anyone useing a chisel to carve our the foot prints. They could only be made by a foot pressing down in soft mud.
My lack of links shows a lot more integrity than your dishonest ones. Why is Baugh reluctant to allow the fake to be tested independently....Because it IS a fake. If you look back a bit you will see many links posted by others confirming this hoax and others.
But hey, if you want to believe liars, hoaxers and unscrupulous people, go for it....It's easy to fool a fool.
By the time of Goliath, the Anakim had "devolved" to the smaller size of Goliath and his brothers.
Absolutely, Goliath was a puny shrimp. But there is evidence depicting that Egypt was ruled by giants. Ramses II would have towered above the puny 36-foot tall Carthaginian giants.
Notice how small the people look? Why else would such a statue of Ramses II have been made so massively huge - unless, of course, he was a giant?
A recent fossil... then... an older fossil... and finally.. a really old fossil. Amazing. NO: "ILLOGICAL"
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeshuasavedme
Where? Give us real life pictures, proofs of the existence of such geologic columns exactly as they are charted in the fairy tale books of evolution. Who visited them and documented them? When? What is their qualifications for declaring them to be true geological columns, stacked up exactly as the fairy tale evolution books stack them up? Where did they go to school? And what are their philosophical world bias', and how did that cause them to see/interpret the evidence which they claim proves their bias'?
AMAZING. SHE DIDN'T READ MY PREVIOUS POST, WHERE I SHOWED HER PICTURES OF A GEOLOGIC COLUMN AND LINKED TO A THREAD ABOUT VARVE ANALYSIS!
So now there's no such thing as erosion-based sedimentary deposition covering dead and sunken organisms in a logical time sequence, as it occurred naturally, in place. That right?
You, with your minor (you wish!) in the basics of geology and sedimentary deposition. What university was that again, YSM?
Green River Overlook, Canyonlands, Utah, USA on Flickr - Photo Sharing! (http://www.flickr.com/photos/terdata/278210762/ - broken link)
And all of Kepler's calculations that proved the planets revolved elliptically (even know what that means, YSM? I doubt it...) around the sun were wrong because you checked them out yourself, what with your PhD in Mathematics.
Why am I no longer surprised? The Dunderhead Strategy Unveiled:
Keep YELLING your silly ideas with your hands clapped over your ears.
Be truly intellectually lazy, not bothering to honestly participate in a debate by looking at the offerings of other debators (who have mistakenly assumed you're an honest and forthright person).
Blatantly claim that all knowledge outside your biblical beliefs is false.
Well.... Wrong.
You are the embodiment of stubborn, anti-scientific, dogma-drivel-driven logical illiteracy, coupled with a near-pathologically obstinant denial of anything you can't personally accept. Your fear of the truth must be palpable!
After a while, the opposition, realizing they are dealing with an Intransigent Dogmo-Theist, will wander off, sadly shaking their heads in disbelief, and you can claim, even in your own twisted head, that you won!
AMAZING. SHE DIDN'T READ MY PREVIOUS POST, WHERE I SHOWED HER PICTURES OF A GEOLOGIC COLUMN AND LINKED TO A THREAD ABOUT VARVE ANALYSIS!
Where is the geologic column stacked up for on site viewing, anywhere on earth which you have seen for yourself, exactly as it is charted in the evolutionary fairy tale books? Where is it? Prove it.
I say you are not able to prove it because it does not exist except in the fairy tale books of evolution -and that is a proven fact!
My lack of links shows a lot more integrity than your dishonest ones. Why is Baugh reluctant to allow the fake to be tested independently....Because it IS a fake. If you look back a bit you will see many links posted by others confirming this hoax and others.
But hey, if you want to believe liars, hoaxers and unscrupulous people, go for it....It's easy to fool a fool.
Do you know what they say about people who always call other people liars? And if your going to say people are murders and hoaxers, you really should present evidence to back up those statements. General past statements made about other people does not cut to the heart of the arguement. Especially when you (specifically) call someone a murder or a hoaxer.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.