Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-07-2008, 09:46 AM
 
66 posts, read 276,747 times
Reputation: 41

Advertisements

My husband and I have a rental house in Georgia which was owner occupied by my husband prior to us renting it out starting in January 2008. We're questioning whether we should try to sell it in the next two years due to the IRS's rule of having lived in the house for the previous 2 of 5 years for no tax on capital gains.

Does anyone know of the pros and cons of holding on to the house longer and continuing to rent it? Or should we sell it within the next two years to avoid paying capital gains on it? Since the market has gone down a bit, we'd like to try to hold on to it longer but if it makes more sense to sell for tax reasons, then that's what we'll do.

Thanks for your insights!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-07-2008, 12:23 PM
JnR
 
Location: Central Coast, Ca
1,709 posts, read 850,740 times
Reputation: 440
You need to live in the house for 2 out of 5 years (which you already know). Do you think you will come back to Georgia again and live in the house for two years later on in the future? If so, then hold onto it until the market gets better. If you do not think there is a chance you would come back, then sell it in the next couple of years. You will have to recapture the depreciation you took on the rental (only depreciate the value of the structure, not the land value). Has the house appreciated in value from the time that he bought it? There may be no capital gains. Anyway, sorry for the jumbled answer, getting distracted at the moment, but you can find answers on the irs website in Publication 523 'Selling Your Home'. Or call your tax accountant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2008, 06:29 PM
 
2,091 posts, read 7,515,619 times
Reputation: 2177
The pro is that if you are renting it for an amount that covers mortgage, property tax and homeowners insurance, then you have a free house, especially if you can rent for even more to cover other expenses or profit.

Chances are that the home will apprciate in the next 30 years that you may have a mortgage for and could very well appreciate over that time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top