Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-23-2010, 07:50 PM
 
1,679 posts, read 3,024,502 times
Reputation: 1296

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali BassMan View Post
How safe are most peoples defined benifit pensions? I understand goverment pensions are very safe but private companies are another thing. I work for a private company, and alot of the recent retires are taking a lump sum versus a monthly stipend, in doing the math, I would have to get around 7% interest on the lump to get what the monthly payments would be. 7% is pretty hard to find right now quarantted..So why take the Lump???
What do you mean earn 7% to break even?

Are you saying you can get 100K upfront vs. 7000/12 monthly?

It depends on your age, since its an annuity calculation. How old are you? Probably the percent is a fair calculation based on your age, you could go online to an annuity calculator to see if you are getting a fair bargain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-23-2010, 07:54 PM
 
1,679 posts, read 3,024,502 times
Reputation: 1296
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
A lot of people could have been up the creek if AIG had been allowed to fail.
That is a commonly stated opinion that is not at all true. If AIG went bankrupt, the holders of the credit default swaps would have been out of money. The policyholders would still have gotten paid.

Your money is generally extremely safe with an insurance company. A company that has its worn pension, that goes bankrupt is another story but the FDIC does insure something like 50K per year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2010, 06:58 AM
 
31,690 posts, read 41,126,622 times
Reputation: 14440
Quote:
Originally Posted by hartford_renter View Post
That is a commonly stated opinion that is not at all true. If AIG went bankrupt, the holders of the credit default swaps would have been out of money. The policyholders would still have gotten paid.

Your money is generally extremely safe with an insurance company. A company that has its worn pension, that goes bankrupt is another story but the FDIC does insure something like 50K per year.
Why are you disagreeing with me? You agree with me. I didn't say who would be up the creek, just that a lot of people would be. So the question related to the thread topic of pension safety is. Are any pension funds invested in Hedge funds or other holdings that invest with credit default swaps or any other investment instrument that would have been at risk if AIG had failed? So how is my statement not true? I never said money with insurance companies isn't usually safe so why are you adding that in your response to me as if I did?

Last edited by TuborgP; 07-24-2010 at 07:12 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2010, 07:10 AM
 
31,690 posts, read 41,126,622 times
Reputation: 14440
emii.com: How Pension Funds Exploit Credit Default Swaps
Credit Default Swaps have received their share of blame for the financial crisis. American International Group’s CDS business not only brought down the insurer but also nearly toppled the financial system. Even George Soros has pronounced CDSs “particularly suspect.”

Why, then, would pension funds consider venturing into the treacherous world of the CDS? The answer is simple: These swaps allow investors to hedge risk and gain easy exposure to credit markets, while offering attractive returns.

The above is from the link
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2010, 08:52 AM
 
1,679 posts, read 3,024,502 times
Reputation: 1296
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
Why are you disagreeing with me? You agree with me. I didn't say who would be up the creek, just that a lot of people would be. So the question related to the thread topic of pension safety is. Are any pension funds invested in Hedge funds or other holdings that invest with credit default swaps or any other investment instrument that would have been at risk if AIG had failed? So how is my statement not true? I never said money with insurance companies isn't usually safe so why are you adding that in your response to me as if I did?
Sorry if I misunderstood you. I was thinking that you meant the pension holders or other policyholders would have been "up the creek" if AIG would not have been bailed out.

Just making clear that if AIG went bankrupt the policyholders would still have been paid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2010, 03:09 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,949,698 times
Reputation: 32535
Default Please help with the color coding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
That is one part of the problem but I don't think Illinois like most states is sitting on ton of reserves in their pension fund. I think ( may be wrong ) that they need money to meet near term pension payments. That would mean they would need to keep selling bonds each year to fund their pension contribution and that isn't going to continually happen. I believe the amount they have in reserve is about 20 years of funding and that because of lifespan is a big problem reforming. The link is a state by state summary with a color code indicating the shape they are in
Assessment of Threats to Public Defined Benefit Pensions (http://www.cwapublicandhealthcare.org/pensions/st-pension-threat-levels.html - broken link)
Maybe I overlooked something, but I did not see any legend listing the meaning of each color. One might assume that the red states are in the most trouble financially (pension-wise) and the green states are in the least trouble, but then what about the other colors? And why would Illinois be yellow? And how can we be sure about red and green without any indication? Plus I did not see any explanation of how the assessments were arrived at. This would be a most interesting and informative link if it were properly explained.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2010, 03:53 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 97,051,418 times
Reputation: 18310
Efen within a stae the soundness of pwension vary. Without getting a annual report ;you can't judge the fund accurately. But fewer pansions lss thwe amount of those with 401K s :I would think. Most pensio that were already in trouble were the ones hit hard by this recession but their business model was also already in trouble.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2010, 05:31 PM
 
31,690 posts, read 41,126,622 times
Reputation: 14440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
Maybe I overlooked something, but I did not see any legend listing the meaning of each color. One might assume that the red states are in the most trouble financially (pension-wise) and the green states are in the least trouble, but then what about the other colors? And why would Illinois be yellow? And how can we be sure about red and green without any indication? Plus I did not see any explanation of how the assessments were arrived at. This would be a most interesting and informative link if it were properly explained.
I believe they took the chart from another publication. I have seen the map before with the coding explained I will try to find and link if I do. It is out there as I have seen it many times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2010, 05:40 PM
 
31,690 posts, read 41,126,622 times
Reputation: 14440
U.S. State Pension Funding Levels : NPR

Here is a map with coding explained that details level of funding on with funding level
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2010, 06:08 AM
 
31,690 posts, read 41,126,622 times
Reputation: 14440
Door may crack wider on CalPERS' operations; California Public Employees' Retirement System; public pension; Alfred Villalobos - latimes.com
Officials at the California Public Employees' Retirement System have shrouded many of their multimillion-dollar transactions in secrecy, refusing to release analyses of potential investments, meeting materials and correspondence relating to venture capital, real estate and other private equity holdings.

Interesting story to read
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top