Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-20-2011, 05:23 PM
 
2,420 posts, read 4,370,042 times
Reputation: 3528

Advertisements

I don’t think that’s an actual word, but I know it’s used a lot now by politicians who make verbal or written boo boos At any rate, I thought the word appropriate. After posting a thread recently and having some exchanges the last few days, I been doing some reflecting.

Upon close self scrutiny and looking back at my initial reactions to some people’s comments, I can see how I was too quick to assume the worst in peoples replies. In giving it some thought, I can attribute it to a few factors.

#1. Inability to read correctly the tone of the poster and their intent.
#2 Annoyance at peoples assumptions (in both directions of dialog) that have no bearing on actual circumstances or reality.
#3. Annoyance at the fact that people sometimes seem to ignore what you have all ready posted, or take what you have said and turn it into something totally different and foreign to your intent.
#4 Hate when someone points out where you have been wrong or things you haven’t considered. (humble pie) Though this one I can usually swallow and fess up to.
5. And last, the reality that some people really are jerks. (though I have not seen it very much on this board) Much more prevalent on my son’s You Tube comments and some boards he frequents.

I have lectured my son who spends a great deal of time sparing on the internet about being too hurtful in his choice of language sometimes, and when responding to someone, who is actually being a jerk, to try and encourage him not to jump into the dirty water with them.

So in my hour or so of contemplation, I said to myself. SELF in the future, if a response p….s you off. WAIT before you answer. Don’t answer when you are upset. YOU may be making some assumptions that are not correct. Don’t let those lightning fast fingers of yours travel over the keyboard at your first knee jerk reaction.

It’s difficult sometime not being a wise guy, cause we can be oh so clever. (so we think).
Does anyone else relate to this? What’s been your experience? (Besides.... That's why they have the edit feature)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-20-2011, 07:00 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,905,232 times
Reputation: 32530
From time to time, I have been guilty of what you're talking about and wished I had toned things down a bit. Several times, I have apologized to people, figuring it's the least I could do. How likely we are to transgress in that way depends a lot on our personality and communications style. Some people are habitually very diplomatic and under-stated. But I have a more vigorous style, and it's a life-long thing. Hard for a leopard to change its spots. Of course this all comes in matters of degrees, and I don't think I'm among the worst offenders. (Hope I'm not deluding myself with that last clause!)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2011, 07:22 PM
 
262 posts, read 781,723 times
Reputation: 353
May I suggest a #5 in certain forums, even here at CD, mods wish to 'steer' the discussion in a certain self serving directions. For example, in one forum I frequent the mod is spouse to a relator who, gets leads from the forum, thus discussion on lower RE commissions or similar topics are deleted. That is not to say being a mod is easy or there are plenty of people lining up for the job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2011, 09:20 PM
 
Location: near bears but at least no snakes
26,653 posts, read 28,677,767 times
Reputation: 50525
It's good of you to reflect and realize. Here's hoping you have whatever it takes to stick to it.

Sometimes I want to lash out when people say stupid things--or mean things. I have a strong sense of fair play and I can see both sides so I can usually restrain myself. My real weakness is when I see REALLY bad grammar and spelling and I want to say, "WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?" (It grates on my nerves.)

One reason I enjoy this retirement forum is that the people usually write well and put some thought into what they are saying. It's mostly the younger people who annoy me with, "Him and me are going to loose some wait." Yup, it just grates on my nerves and I keep thinking that someone needs to TELL them or that kind of writing will spread even further.

Lately when I see that sort of thing (and it happens far too often..) I go into the Writing Forum where there is a thread called "I can't stand it anymore."
Once inside, I read and laugh.

That works for me. As the OP pointed out, you do have to stop and think and specifically decide to not do it. Not hurt anyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2011, 09:44 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,905,232 times
Reputation: 32530
What's hardest for me are the neo-nazis and holocaust deniers who sometimes inhabit the History Forum. It makes me so angry and frustrated to read the smug denials of the unspeakable sufferings of World War II and there is no possibility of dialog with those people, as they themselves are literally in denial. I had to stop reading the History Forum for a while. Another frustration is the firm belief in zombies which I encounter in the Self-Sufficiency and Preparedness Forum. That people live in a world of make-believe which is real to them is scary. And what can I say to such people? That there is no such thing as zombies? I've tried that, but it doesn't work, of course. Similar are the Mayan calendar people. How does one explain to them that it is irrational to assume that the Mayans could foretell the future? Disagreement I can handle, but belief in fairy tales? The U.S. bashers in the History Forum, while not as objectionable as the holocaust deniers, do nonetheless get my goat. They claim a moral equivalency between Japan and the United States in World War II. World War II is one of my main hobby reading interests, so I come to that discussion with a fair amount of knowledge and I know of the systematic brutality of the Japanese war machine. No amount of citations will reach these U.S. haters, however. Very frustrating.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2011, 10:28 AM
 
2,420 posts, read 4,370,042 times
Reputation: 3528
Interesting hearing other people's experience. I guess we all have our hot buttons and areas of passion. Being an atheist and wanting to be left alone to my own personal beliefs, I tend to get ruffled sometimes when people take on (what I perceive) as a moral superiority and judgmental attitude with me. In my gut I really want to call them a pious SOB, but thankfully I have been able to refrain. Then I think about it, and realize it is my problem, and they can no more think differently about it, than I can. I live in a world, where my beliefs are in the minority and must learn to cope.

Interesting hearing about the zombie believers and holocaust
deniers Escort Rider. How do you even respond to people like that? That would leave me breathless too. I can relate to your natural temperament, and working to tone it down. I have a tendency to be a little too direct sometimes and need to learn to soften the edges a bit. Sometimes, when I write a response to someone, it sounds OK to me when I am writing it, but when I go back and re-read it, I realize I was sounding a little harsh and have to go back and do a re-write.

In-newengland. I figure you must be a writer, so this is your passion. This is not my strong point, so be gentle.

Toymeister. I haven't come across those posts yet, but now I will be looking for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2011, 11:28 AM
 
13,496 posts, read 18,190,645 times
Reputation: 37885
We might be better served if some posters were en brochette rather than online. I am morally weak and easily tempted, I do use the Ignore List for the juicier ones.

IMHO, If you don't believe in zombies, it simply means that you are not acquainted with Facebook.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2011, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,905,232 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevxu View Post
IMHO, If you don't believe in zombies, it simply means that you are not acquainted with Facebook.
Good one! LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2011, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,802 posts, read 41,008,695 times
Reputation: 62199
Quote:
Originally Posted by modhatter View Post
I don’t think that’s an actual word, but I know it’s used a lot now by politicians who make verbal or written boo boos At any rate, I thought the word appropriate. After posting a thread recently and having some exchanges the last few days, I been doing some reflecting.

Upon close self scrutiny and looking back at my initial reactions to some people’s comments, I can see how I was too quick to assume the worst in peoples replies. In giving it some thought, I can attribute it to a few factors.

#1. Inability to read correctly the tone of the poster and their intent.
#2 Annoyance at peoples assumptions (in both directions of dialog) that have no bearing on actual circumstances or reality.
#3. Annoyance at the fact that people sometimes seem to ignore what you have all ready posted, or take what you have said and turn it into something totally different and foreign to your intent.
#4 Hate when someone points out where you have been wrong or things you haven’t considered. (humble pie) Though this one I can usually swallow and fess up to.
5. And last, the reality that some people really are jerks. (though I have not seen it very much on this board) Much more prevalent on my son’s You Tube comments and some boards he frequents.
If I knew to what posts you referred, I would have probably attributed it to your newbieness (is that a word? ) I see by your posting history that you haven't posted in any forums except this one and have been on CD since the beginning of this month. Tip: If you want to get a feel for where a poster is coming from, rather than just what they are saying in one thread, read some of their previous posts. Click on their name in any message and choose "read all posts by." You can learn a lot about a poster that way.

If you want to convey tone, use emoticons/smilies.

Don't assume you or your opinions/responses make a lasting impression on people. Posters sometimes think you remember them or what they said (good or bad) the day before or the week before. A poster or their post is out of mind for me after I hit, Submit Reply. Bet I'm not the only one.

There are some CD forums geared to opinion and those can get heated but the people who stick around in them actually enjoy the sparring, I think, or they wouldn't keep coming back. Deep down we all know no one is changing anyone's mind. I have been on "membership" forums. If people are paying for the privilege of posting to some site's message boards, you are getting a lot of like-minded people. It may be civil but it's really dull in a predominantly opinion-type forum (as opposed to an information-sharing type forum).

This Retirement forum is pretty benign, in my opinion. If something here made you twitchy, you might want to avoid forums like Politics and Other Controversies, General US, Great Debates, etc.

Reading comprehension is a problem for some but it's pretty easy to point out what they missed.

If your Number 4 bothers you, it's going to be tough for you in some CD forums. I'm just sayin'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2011, 05:39 PM
 
Location: SW MO
23,593 posts, read 37,475,357 times
Reputation: 29337
Is Internet Miss-Speak anything like a costume malfunction?

Perhaps a simple rule of thumb when you come across people you find unpleasant, ignorant, etc. is this; if you wouldn't engage them in real life, don't engage them on-line.

Memo to self: Follow your own advice!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top