Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-13-2013, 09:40 PM
 
11,180 posts, read 16,075,953 times
Reputation: 29956

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 View Post
Only 50% effectiveness, which wanes with age.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
I am 68 and got the shot when I turned 65. I wish the effectiveness were more than 50%, but I'll take what I can get.
It is - - - for you.

That 50% figure that is usually given is for all vaccine recipients 60 and over. However, the vaccine is more effective in the youngest cohort of the overall group. It is 64% for recipients between 60-69 and drops to 38% for those over 70.


Vaccines: VPD-VAC/Shingles/Herpes Zoster (Shingles) Vaccination


In a clinical trial involving more than 38,000 adults 60 years of age or older, the vaccine reduced the overall incidence of shingles by 51% and the incidence of PHN by 67%. The efficacy of the vaccine in preventing shingles was higher in the younger age group (60-69 years; vaccine efficacy was 64%) than in the older age group (older than 70 years; vaccine efficacy was 38%).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-14-2013, 02:03 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,177 posts, read 26,290,358 times
Reputation: 27919
One important thing to keep in mind about Shingles is to get familiar with the symptoms that can occur before the rash so you can get alert enough to get to a doctor the "minute" you break out.
Getting on an anti-viral ASAP ...suggested is by 72 hours, sooner the better...can make it much less severe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2013, 04:27 AM
 
Location: Virginia
18,717 posts, read 31,156,456 times
Reputation: 42989
The thing about shingles that makes me wonder is why we're hearing so much about it this year--but I never heard anything about it on the news at all last year or the years before that. You'd think we'd be hearing the same amount of news stories year after year if it was really such a big thing to worry about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2013, 07:06 AM
 
2,479 posts, read 2,224,202 times
Reputation: 2277
Default Does Anyone Remember?

That if one child in the family got the mumps, etc., parents made sure the other children got it too. Why? Not sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2013, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,953,126 times
Reputation: 32535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistermobile View Post
That if one child in the family got the mumps, etc., parents made sure the other children got it too. Why? Not sure.
I believe the thinking (justified or not) was as follows: Once a child has had the mumps, that child has lifetime immunity to it. If one gets the mumps in adulthood, it is frequently more severe with a greater chance of complications.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2013, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,953,126 times
Reputation: 32535
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadManofBethesda View Post
It is - - - for you.

That 50% figure that is usually given is for all vaccine recipients 60 and over. However, the vaccine is more effective in the youngest cohort of the overall group. It is 64% for recipients between 60-69 and drops to 38% for those over 70.


Vaccines: VPD-VAC/Shingles/Herpes Zoster (Shingles) Vaccination


In a clinical trial involving more than 38,000 adults 60 years of age or older, the vaccine reduced the overall incidence of shingles by 51% and the incidence of PHN by 67%. The efficacy of the vaccine in preventing shingles was higher in the younger age group (60-69 years; vaccine efficacy was 64%) than in the older age group (older than 70 years; vaccine efficacy was 38%).
Thanks for providing that more nuanced information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2013, 07:42 AM
 
Location: Virginia
18,717 posts, read 31,156,456 times
Reputation: 42989
Is there any reason to wait until you're 60 to get this vaccine? If it can strike some people in their 50s you'd think they'd want people to get vaccinated a lot earlier. Is it really just a matter of the vaccine being in short supply (somehow that seems like an odd reason)?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2013, 07:49 AM
 
Location: Mayberry
36,496 posts, read 16,090,364 times
Reputation: 72854
I know 2 people that got Shingles that had the vaccine. My Dad won't get it, he's 83, I can't afford it, it's like 250.00 or something ridiculous like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2013, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Long Neck,De
4,792 posts, read 8,212,411 times
Reputation: 4840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caladium View Post
The thing about shingles that makes me wonder is why we're hearing so much about it this year--but I never heard anything about it on the news at all last year or the years before that. You'd think we'd be hearing the same amount of news stories year after year if it was really such a big thing to worry about.
Seriously I think it has to do with the folks selling the vacine.. I am well over 60 and had shingles a few years ago. At that time I don't believe there was a vacine. There have been some comments about heredity (sp) I think that is false because no one in my family ever had shingles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2013, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Canada
7,694 posts, read 5,573,313 times
Reputation: 8827
I got shingles in April 2006. I remember the big news announcement two months later when the FDA approved the use of the vaccine. I believe the vaccine was in short supply for some years after that, presumably because of the big demand.

The vaccine has live viruses which must be kept frozen during storage. I know the big pharmacy chain in my city doesn't carry the vaccine for that reason. When the vaccine is removed from the freezer, it must be used within 30 minutes before the live viruses die.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top