Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-06-2014, 12:32 AM
 
4,862 posts, read 7,964,579 times
Reputation: 5768

Advertisements

Get a trust. It's also a good idea to plan for your father too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-06-2014, 01:18 AM
 
9,891 posts, read 11,768,929 times
Reputation: 22087
If the assets had been placed in a TRUST there would not be a need for an estate. Her home would be owned by the trust, her bank accounts would have been in the trust name, etc. She would be the beneficiary of the trust while alive, signing the checks, etc. The trust would be set up, so she was in complete control as long as alive and could do anything with any of her assets as long as she is alive. Just in her trust name, not her own. On her death, the next trustee steps into the picture, and is now the beneficiary. No Probate. No stress. Setting up the trust costs about what it costs to make a good will. Good thing at her death, there is no probate or probate expense. There is no 4 to 12 months to worry about before the ownership changes to the beneficiary of her will like with a will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 02:45 AM
 
6,438 posts, read 6,920,976 times
Reputation: 8743
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtrader View Post
If the assets had been placed in a TRUST there would not be a need for an estate. Her home would be owned by the trust, her bank accounts would have been in the trust name, etc. She would be the beneficiary of the trust while alive, signing the checks, etc. The trust would be set up, so she was in complete control as long as alive and could do anything with any of her assets as long as she is alive. Just in her trust name, not her own. On her death, the next trustee steps into the picture, and is now the beneficiary. No Probate. No stress. Setting up the trust costs about what it costs to make a good will. Good thing at her death, there is no probate or probate expense. There is no 4 to 12 months to worry about before the ownership changes to the beneficiary of her will like with a will.
This is correct, but very difficult for a non-lawyer to implement. Consult a trusts and estates attorney.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 07:49 AM
 
1,316 posts, read 1,448,273 times
Reputation: 1940
Quote:
Originally Posted by michgc View Post
My mother-in-law suffered a debilitating stroke over the winter and is in a nursing home. She likely doesn't have much time left. In the mean time, my husband has power of attorney over her finances. Is there anything he needs to do financially before she dies that would make sense tax-wise versus doing it after she dies?

This is what she has:

She owns a house worth about $100K. It is in her name and my husband's name, although not with survivorship. He will be selling this house. It can be sold now or later.

She has an annuity IRA worth about $85K

She has another annuity (not IRA) also worth about $85K

She has mutual funds worth $30K

She has CDs worth $60K

She has about $20K in her checking account which will pay for her funeral and other expenses. The checking account is joint with my husband.

These are all of her assets. My husband is an only child and is the beneficiary on anything that has a beneficiary.

We were just going to plug along and take care of things after she passes, but just want to make sure there isn't something that should be done beforehand either because of taxes or because there is less complicated paperwork.

If you have any tips, let me know. Thanks!
If your husband has POA to sell the house, she will not be eligible to utilize Medicaid, if she will ever need to, for at least (I think) 3 years after the sale.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 07:53 AM
 
Location: UpstateNY
8,612 posts, read 10,765,774 times
Reputation: 7596
I think Medicaid lookback is five years now......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 05:43 PM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,534,651 times
Reputation: 18618
Quote:
Originally Posted by michgc View Post
Thanks, Biscuitmom. That's my husband's understanding on how it works here in NC, too. We just now need to check if he is on all of the accounts.
You might need the Letter of Testamentary. My brother took one but the bank didn't ask for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, formerly NoVA and Phila
9,779 posts, read 15,793,171 times
Reputation: 10888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaffeetrekker View Post
If your husband has POA to sell the house, she will not be eligible to utilize Medicaid, if she will ever need to, for at least (I think) 3 years after the sale.....
Fortunately, she has lifetime long-term care insurance so she will not need Medicaid. Her days are numbered in the nursing home anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, formerly NoVA and Phila
9,779 posts, read 15,793,171 times
Reputation: 10888
Quote:
Originally Posted by biscuitmom View Post
You might need the Letter of Testamentary. My brother took one but the bank didn't ask for it.
Yes, I believe that is what my husband said. Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2014, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
5,329 posts, read 6,021,569 times
Reputation: 10978
The house. I'm not sure what you mean when you state that your H is on the deed but that his mother is the owner. Everyone named on a deed has some type of interest in the property. Tenants in Common? Joint Tenants? Remainder of Life Estate? hmm.

I don't believe you need to consult with an estates attorney, but I do suggest you consult with a financial or tax professional to determine whether it is best to wait until after your MIL dies before selling the home. In general, there is a tax advantage to selling/transferring ownership of the home AFTER the owner dies (stepped up basis). But this might not apply in your particular situation.

Everything else looks great.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2014, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
14,229 posts, read 30,038,208 times
Reputation: 27689
I would urge you to see the attorney and get it all straight now.

My father died in 2003, my mom in 2009, and my H in 2012. None of them did any kind of planning. I am still slugging away at collecting the estates 11 years later. And I have had to pay significant legal fees as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top