Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-07-2017, 07:54 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,050,316 times
Reputation: 14434

Advertisements

Interesting read and applicable to some in the forum.

Retirement: The Top Secret of Wealthy Retirees | Money

Quote:
Individuals that have saved successfully for retirement evidently cannot kick the habit. Even after they have reached retirement age they continue to save, on average, 31% of income, new research shows.
In many cases this continued saving comes from income streams guaranteed for life, such as a traditional pension, certain annuities, or Social Security. So further saving may have little to do with financial security—and much to do with a routine that has served them well over the years. If you are looking for the top secret of affluent retirees, it may be just that simple.

It’s tempting to assume that affluent retirees keep saving simply because they have the means to live as they wish and still have income left over. But that probably sells them short. They had to save or work hard for their pension to get there. It’s the habit that made it happen—and once established it’s tough to kick.
As I posted earlier our SS strategy was based on a fixed lifetime income that would enable us to continue to save and invest in a good way. We understand life events can get in the way but we have tried to plan for that. One of the advantages of LTCi is that it offers you to be in a nursing home and continue to save and invest. What for? Who cares it is the process that some are focused on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-07-2017, 09:50 PM
 
Location: 5,400 feet
4,867 posts, read 4,807,826 times
Reputation: 7957
Quote:
Originally Posted by DurangoJoe View Post
Except that with current interest rates, factoring a PV rate into it would only yield a very low percentage every year (2%?), far below the 8%/yr that it grows while waiting until 70.

At least that's my take on it.

If you assume 2%, then you may be correct. But we have averaged way over that during for last 8 years, even when the market tanked. I think I used 5-5.5% when I did the analysis because we are almost always fully invested, although the investments change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 04:20 AM
 
106,707 posts, read 108,880,922 times
Reputation: 80199
after break even is when ss develops an roi and because it is an inflation adjusted roi it can be quite a nice return .

if only 1 person in a couple makes it until 90 which today is about a coin toss the roi in real return is 5% .

that rivals a real return on a balanced portfolio from what amounts to a gov't bond . it would take the best outcomes with a balanced fund to see a 5% real return today starting out with rates this low and stocks so high .

the ss carry's no inflation or most important sequence risk so less powder has to be kept in reserve for poor outcomes and poor sequencing allowing higher spending .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 08:21 AM
 
Location: RVA
2,782 posts, read 2,083,686 times
Reputation: 6655
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiminnm View Post
If you assume 2%, then you may be correct. But we have averaged way over that during for last 8 years, even when the market tanked. I think I used 5-5.5% when I did the analysis because we are almost always fully invested, although the investments change.
The problem is that anyone with a decent concept of investing has done well over the last 8 years. There have been no real bears at all, just small corrections, and only 2 at around the 10% plus range. To actually plan on investments doing as well over the last 8 years would be delusional. Investors were saying the same thing in 2000. How many of us lost 50-60% on Technology sure things? Remember Qualcomm dropping from 200+ to 20?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 08:46 AM
 
Location: La Costa, California
919 posts, read 790,147 times
Reputation: 2023
yes and Qualcom right now is 56.32. So those of us who bought after the tech bubble did well. And as far as return "after break even" Stating at 66 as I have, break even puts me almost to 90 years old. I think I'll be fine enjoying the extra cash now and if I end up on the short end after age 90, I think I'll be able to handle it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 08:51 AM
 
106,707 posts, read 108,880,922 times
Reputation: 80199
extra cash ? if you can't lay out the "extra cash " as you call it as part of the draw day 1 of retirement and just replace it later than you may really not have the option to delay .

it makes no sense to wait decades for the " extra cash " all you really should be doing is letting the bigger check down the road replace what was laid out up front as demand on your own portfolio falls off .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 09:16 AM
 
Location: La Costa, California
919 posts, read 790,147 times
Reputation: 2023
Well, I'm not retired - just started SS at fra. I put my SS check and a portion of my regular income in a balanced fund. What I mean by extra cash is that I will be able to enjoy some things in my life at ages 66 to 90 that I probably wouldn't have had I waited till 70. My IRA is not large and I wouldn't want to withdraw from it at this time.
Dave
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 09:56 AM
 
106,707 posts, read 108,880,922 times
Reputation: 80199
without the funds to safely spend down while delaying and not working , delaying is really not a choice if one is living off their portfolio .

it makes no sense to retire , delay and wait decades to take a pay increase . better to take it up front if that is the case
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 10:13 AM
 
1,180 posts, read 2,923,525 times
Reputation: 3558
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
extra cash ? if you can't lay out the "extra cash " as you call it as part of the draw day 1 of retirement and just replace it later than you may really not have the option to delay .

it makes no sense to wait decades for the " extra cash " all you really should be doing is letting the bigger check down the road replace what was laid out up front as demand on your own portfolio falls off .

So when you say "just replace it later" do mean replace the income stream or replace the money from the funds you used.?

For example in order for us to delay taking SS for a few years to allow it to grow we would have to take maybe 200-250K from a bigger pot. Now when we DO decide to take SS we won't need to take anything from the "pot" anymore-(except minimum distributions) and we weren't thinking of replenishing the 250K we took- are you saying we should?? (I hope I explained that clearly).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 12:05 PM
 
106,707 posts, read 108,880,922 times
Reputation: 80199
yes , you replace the extra money you drew out . you are basically fronting your self the age 62 payment from ss money right up front that you are not collecting.

so basically you calculate like you are getting that check at 62 but fronting it to yourself .

so as an example if you planned around 4% of your portfolio you would draw the whole thing from your portfolio while delaying . then once ss kicks in you can take the 62 amount you planned around and put the rest of the 69% bigger check towards refilling savings .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top