Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-12-2010, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,835 posts, read 14,951,507 times
Reputation: 16587

Advertisements

I got my answer, will start to collect at 66.

My concern is what my wife gets and if all she gets is survivor there's no reason why I should wait to age 70 to draw.

If I wait to age 70 I would draw an additional $683/month.

Figuring interest at 2% if I start drawing at age 66, while continuing to work, in four years I will have $101,856.00 saved. If I withdrew at $655/month it would last to age 85 and in the meantime if I died first my wife would get whatever it left which would be better than $80,000 if I died at 72.

Really a no brainer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-12-2010, 07:42 PM
 
Location: it depends
6,369 posts, read 6,417,540 times
Reputation: 6388
The only way to mathematically prove that one strategy is better than another requires that you know the date that is going on your death certificate. So it really comes down to intuition. The safest course for long-term financial security is to defer payments, although law changes or tax changes or your funeral could really mess your planning up.

I don't think future changes will affect near-retirees.

Last edited by marcopolo; 06-12-2010 at 07:43 PM.. Reason: improve language
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2010, 07:56 PM
 
361 posts, read 738,179 times
Reputation: 506
See, here's my $.02 worth.
Why work those extra few years if you'd rather retire?!
The bigger issue is retire at 62 or at 66 or someplace between!
At my age, I wanna do what I wanna do, and I'm not going to stress about a couple hundred more a month.
But I'm still hanging on at work myself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2010, 08:17 PM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,838 posts, read 17,131,949 times
Reputation: 11535
I hear ya man but $1500 wont cover the bone and $2100 will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2010, 11:14 PM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,220,957 times
Reputation: 9628
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
I got my answer, will start to collect at 66.
Please contact SS directly and ask them the same questions. What I post is my understanding of what they told me, but you may get a different understanding. I am inclined to start collecting at 66 also, based on what I think I know. It is such an important decision, however, that I keep asking the questions to make sure I understand the SS procedures. For us, a $200 a month reduction could mean the difference between my surviving wife being able to pay the light bill or not.


"There is wisdom in much counsel" the Bible tells us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2010, 04:49 AM
 
4,265 posts, read 11,434,177 times
Reputation: 5822
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
I hear ya man but $1500 wont cover the bone and $2100 will.
I hear what you're saying. My DH and I are both nurses (I'm an NP, he's an RN). We are currently 56 and 59 and enjoy good health. Although we still enjoy our work, it seems in the past year we talk about retirement constantly! Mainly the financial end but it has gotten to the point that we now are so looking forward to retiring! We've pretty much decided that we'll retire at 66. My SS at 66 will be just over $2400/mo and would go to just over $3000 if I worked until 70. My husband's benefits are just a little less. In past years, we both thought we'd wait until we were 70 but now, no way! 66? Bring it on!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2010, 07:32 AM
 
31,686 posts, read 41,080,669 times
Reputation: 14434
Folks do the research on the 62/70 strategy for some married couples. It sounds like the winner for some folks with their stated goals etc. Remember one of you can defer to 70 and start collecting spousal benefits on the others SS at 66 and then switch to your own at 70. I previously posted a link to a
Forbes article on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2010, 07:42 AM
 
31,686 posts, read 41,080,669 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson View Post
OMG I'd be retiring at 62 and go fishing or something fun. There are AN AWFUL LOT OF PEOPLE who die between 65 and 70 years of age and never get to enjoy the retirement that they worked so hard for.

Party dude.

20yrsinBranson
And so many who lived well into their 90's broke because they blew it all in their 60's and didn't build a solid enough base for life beyond 75. Sorta like those who blew it in their 40's thinking 65 would never really be that important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2010, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
5,332 posts, read 6,032,683 times
Reputation: 10983
Survivor benefits are based on the amount of benefits the deceased retiree was receiving at time of death. So, yes, waiting until you are 70 years of age to collect will provide the greatest benefit to the surviving widow/widower (assuming the survivor benefit is greater than the surviving spouse's retirement amount on his/her own record.) Here's a link to a paper that mentions this and also explores tax ramifications of collecting social security versus withdrawing IRA distributions.
http://www.prudential.com/media/mana...Strategies.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2010, 08:27 AM
 
Location: SoCal desert
8,091 posts, read 15,449,187 times
Reputation: 15038
I just cannot imagine working until I'm 70.
I can't even imagine working until I'm 65.

I'm tired of working now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top