Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Rhode Island
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-10-2017, 10:50 AM
 
Location: NYC/Boston/Fairfield CT
1,853 posts, read 1,963,657 times
Reputation: 1635

Advertisements

I am not sure if this has been discussed here before, however the Boston Surface project looks great.

Does this mean good things for Woonsocket? I certainly hope so.

Commuter rail company moves to Woonsocket - News - telegram.com - Worcester, MA

Commuter rail company moves to Woonsocket
Sunday
Posted Jun 26, 2016 at 10:18 AM
Share

WORCESTER - Boston Surface Railroad, the company aiming to connect Worcester and Providence by commuter rail, has moved into new offices in Woonsocket, R.I.

Situated almost halfway between Providence and Worcester, Woonsocket will likely be the commuter rail's only stop. According to Boston Surface's website, the company hopes to start trips in early 2018 and is exploring the option of beginning service from Woonsocket to Providence earlier than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-10-2017, 12:14 PM
 
1,586 posts, read 2,153,969 times
Reputation: 2418
I'm all for more rail, but this seems like such a pipe dream. Is there really demand for commuter rail between Providence and Worcester, especially with only one stop in between? How many people are even doing that commute?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2017, 01:09 PM
 
Location: NYC/Boston/Fairfield CT
1,853 posts, read 1,963,657 times
Reputation: 1635
Quote:
Originally Posted by boulevardofdef View Post
I'm all for more rail, but this seems like such a pipe dream. Is there really demand for commuter rail between Providence and Worcester, especially with only one stop in between? How many people are even doing that commute?
According to this article: Boston Surface Railway Company plans to create a Worcester to Providence commuter rail by 2018 | masslive.com about 30,000 cars travel daily.

If they can get this project off the ground, it'll be great for the Worcester-Providence Corridor. In MA, development has been so Boston-centric, that this shift could help Central MA/Northern RI, economically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2017, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Providence, RI
12,945 posts, read 22,123,808 times
Reputation: 14181
In order for it to be successful, they'll need to upgrade the tracks (a significant investment) to allow for faster and more frequent service. 75 minutes on a train when it takes an hour by car isn't all that appealing of an option. Especially when you consider that you need to transfer to to a local transit service (not particularly wonderful in Worcester), or walk (also not particularly wonderful in Worcester) to your final destination. 2 or 3 trips each way per day isn't really great either. A lot of the benefits of a Worcester-Providence connection via rail come from transfer opportunities for the folks from Worcester. They can connect to Acela (or regional Amtrak service), TF Green Commuter Rail, or RIPTA throughout the state. 2 or 3 trips daily doesn't really make those transfers viable (at least not with any sort of flexibility). For frequent service could be an economic spark for Providence and connect Worcester to another great job market.

I love the ambition and the fact that it's largely being done through private investment. I also think the price tag is great. However, in order to make the service viable, it needs to be more frequent and faster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2017, 06:09 PM
 
Location: NYC/Boston/Fairfield CT
1,853 posts, read 1,963,657 times
Reputation: 1635
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrfox View Post
In order for it to be successful, they'll need to upgrade the tracks (a significant investment) to allow for faster and more frequent service. 75 minutes on a train when it takes an hour by car isn't all that appealing of an option. Especially when you consider that you need to transfer to to a local transit service (not particularly wonderful in Worcester), or walk (also not particularly wonderful in Worcester) to your final destination. 2 or 3 trips each way per day isn't really great either. A lot of the benefits of a Worcester-Providence connection via rail come from transfer opportunities for the folks from Worcester. They can connect to Acela (or regional Amtrak service), TF Green Commuter Rail, or RIPTA throughout the state. 2 or 3 trips daily doesn't really make those transfers viable (at least not with any sort of flexibility). For frequent service could be an economic spark for Providence and connect Worcester to another great job market.

I love the ambition and the fact that it's largely being done through private investment. I also think the price tag is great. However, in order to make the service viable, it needs to be more frequent and faster.
I agree with your overall sentiment. We can't expect them to expand the service and upgrade the tracks without seeing the response to the initial service. Both Worcester and Providence are solid regional cities with growing economies. I hope that this project hits the rails and further supports economic development in both cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2017, 07:19 PM
 
23,772 posts, read 18,882,064 times
Reputation: 10888
I don't know, it doesn't seem like either DT Providence or DT Worcester are booming with jobs. At least not a significant amount that would attract enough riders on the train to make it feasible. Traffic is not a huge issue in either city (less so in Worcester than Providence), and greater incentive must be provided to ride vs. drive. Even in rush hour, the train won't save you any time without significant upgrades. If it were ever to happen, in addition to Woonsocket I would add a stop by the Park and Ride off 146/Mass Pike in Millbury, as well as off 295 in Cumberland. Maybe then extend it to TF Green (but of course it isn't even utilized with its current service to Providence and Boston).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2017, 06:19 AM
 
Location: chepachet
1,549 posts, read 3,061,353 times
Reputation: 793
Quote:
Originally Posted by massnative71 View Post
I don't know, it doesn't seem like either DT Providence or DT Worcester are booming with jobs. At least not a significant amount that would attract enough riders on the train to make it feasible. Traffic is not a huge issue in either city (less so in Worcester than Providence), and greater incentive must be provided to ride vs. drive. Even in rush hour, the train won't save you any time without significant upgrades. If it were ever to happen, in addition to Woonsocket I would add a stop by the Park and Ride off 146/Mass Pike in Millbury, as well as off 295 in Cumberland. Maybe then extend it to TF Green (but of course it isn't even utilized with its current service to Providence and Boston).
according to MBTA Nov, 2013 figures Boston bound travel from T.F. Green is 230 daily average and 160 from Wickford. There are at least 20 stations on the MBTA commuter rail system that have fewer passengers than both of these Rhode Island stations. These figures do no include reverse commutes or travel between intermediate stations. Thus, there is no count for travelers who's destination is Providence. The last estimation of those who commute by train into Providence was in 2014, about 50 northbound and 300 southbound M-F daily.

http://www.mbta.com/about_the_mbta/d...Search+Library
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2017, 06:32 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Rhode Island
9,333 posts, read 14,959,153 times
Reputation: 10458
A stop in Woonsocket might be very good for people working in Boston and looking for a place to live since Woonsocket affords cheaper housing and certainly needs some improving. However, it might be bad for all the low income people currently living in Woonsocket on low rent unless they are capable/qualified to get better jobs in Boston. Their rents would go up. So, depends on your point of view. Same, although perhaps to a lesser degree, would apply to Worcester.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2017, 11:29 AM
 
1,586 posts, read 2,153,969 times
Reputation: 2418
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr2448 View Post
according to MBTA Nov, 2013 figures Boston bound travel from T.F. Green is 230 daily average and 160 from Wickford. There are at least 20 stations on the MBTA commuter rail system that have fewer passengers than both of these Rhode Island stations. These figures do no include reverse commutes or travel between intermediate stations. Thus, there is no count for travelers who's destination is Providence. The last estimation of those who commute by train into Providence was in 2014, about 50 northbound and 300 southbound M-F daily.
Just anecdotal evidence, but whenever I take the train from TF Green, the platform is packed. I'm not really sure if it would support too many more people -- at that point you'd have to add more trains.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollytree View Post
A stop in Woonsocket might be very good for people working in Boston and looking for a place to live since Woonsocket affords cheaper housing and certainly needs some improving. However, it might be bad for all the low income people currently living in Woonsocket on low rent unless they are capable/qualified to get better jobs in Boston. Their rents would go up. So, depends on your point of view. Same, although perhaps to a lesser degree, would apply to Worcester.
I think I'm one of the few people in this state who think Woonsocket has some serious potential. If you squint hard enough, it's a really attractive, well-laid-out place. Nobody seems to be able to get past "but the economy" and "it's not doing well and therefore things can never get better." I was talking it up to a co-worker who lives in Cumberland and she said, "There are murders there!" (There's an average of about one per year -- some years have none, some years have two.)

But yeah, gentrification is a double-edged sword.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2017, 02:34 PM
 
11,113 posts, read 19,584,868 times
Reputation: 10175
^^^^ It's not gentrification that's the problem. Woonsocket was a decent lower end city, working class people. Many families migrated from Canada during the depression for low wage jobs, even children worked in the textile mills doing rough jobs 10 / 11 hrs. a day. The mills saved Woonsocket back then, people formed little 'areas' and streets etc. which they named for their origins. It was a very religious Roman Catholic area as well, there were some beautiful churches and parochial schools, and the people were proud.

As the years went by, a bad element moved in, mills went out of business, real estate development was zero; families crowded into 3 and 4+ unit homes. Housing for the elderly and poor were the only buildings being built. Later in the 70's and 80's there were a few new home developments, but now even those are crime ridden and low end areas, many of those homes have been 'let go'. They rehabbed the Stadium theater and that became somewhat popular again.

Woonsocket will always have a stigma in RI. The only worse city is Central Falls which had a similar history of textile mill workers, also where many French Canadians settled. They were proud people, but they were very poor (yet very religious as well). Woonsocket and Central Falls may never overcome the stigma of houses literally on top of each other, lots of bars, a heavy drinking reputation, and a high percentage of residents on welfare, slum landlords -- all of which breed crime. For the past 20 years or so the criminal element has been rampant.

Newer residents of RI don't know and haven't seen or heard about the true RI history. Most native RI people don't clamor for city living; that is how the state developed. Just like other states, the suburbs offer a better quality of life. (You found that to be true by living a short time in the Edgewood area, then moving 'up' to East Greenwich.) There are many dividing lines in RI.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Rhode Island

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top