Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-19-2010, 03:59 PM
 
1 posts, read 1,953 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

So myself and two other girls decided to live with each other at a specific apartment complex, applied, were accepted, and then made an $800 deposit (split 3 ways, $267 each). One of the girls decided not to live with us, and is now claiming that we told her she'd get her deposit back (which my roommate and I know we never did!) After she decided not to live with us, my roommate and I decided to live within the same management company but at a different complex down the street so we wouldn't lose all our money. The girl who decided not to live with us signed something at the complex saying that she agreed our transfer of the $800 to an apartment within the same management company but at a different complex, even though they charged us $100 to do so. She never signed a lease, to be clear, she only gave a deposit and then decided more than a month later to withdraw from living with us. I'd consider that forfeiting a deposit.

We have offered to give her $267 -$100 back, because we feel that she should at the very least have to pay for the transfer fee since it's her fault we didn't live in the original 3 bedroom apartment as it is. We feel that giving her $167 back is completely reasonable, if not overly nice, but she is refusing and says that we owe her the full $267.

If she takes us to court on this, does she have a case? She is under the delusion that my roommate and I agreed verbally to pay her back, but we know we didn't. We were nice enough to offer $167 back, but now that she is being ridiculous about it, I personally don't think she deserves anything! Is there any law that would back either case up on this, or are we going to have to waste our time in small claims court?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-19-2010, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Mokelumne Hill, CA & El Pescadero, BCS MX.
6,957 posts, read 22,317,496 times
Reputation: 6471
This is why they came up with small claims courts. Worst case you have to pay her the entire amount, best case you don't have to pay her anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2010, 05:37 PM
 
Location: Coachella Valley, California
15,639 posts, read 41,047,807 times
Reputation: 13472
Depending on who has the more convincing argument, it could go either way. Going to small claims court could be an all day thing. You have to decide if it's worth it to you for such a small sum. On the other hand, you could go ahead and file and have her served. She may just settle up with you before it gets to court, and you can just take it off calendar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2010, 01:56 AM
 
Location: Sacramento, Placerville
2,511 posts, read 6,301,562 times
Reputation: 2260
With few exceptions, rental deposits in California are always refundable, minus the amount for cleaning or repairing damage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2010, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Columbia, California
6,664 posts, read 30,622,786 times
Reputation: 5184
You could mail her a check for the $167. She can then decide if it was worth filing a court case for the remaining $100.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top