Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-27-2009, 05:01 PM
 
Location: Carmichael, CA
2,410 posts, read 4,453,164 times
Reputation: 4379

Advertisements

I live in the older part of Carmichael--as stated in other threads, suburbs and boring. Meaning not very much crime, no gangs.

On the street next to mine are two sad foreclosures, one for $99,000 and the other a little over $100,000. They need paint, probably carpeting and a lot of love. A house at the end of the street has already been "done" by a contractor--same size and floorplan of house, and sold for over $250K.

If you're willing to do some work, there's plenty of good basic houses out there.

And Majin--isn't "north of the American River" pretty much the entire north area?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-27-2009, 07:03 PM
 
8,673 posts, read 17,275,986 times
Reputation: 4685
The problem with Natomas is that it could very easily resemble New Orleans...during the summer of 2005. The levees built there were recently decertified, nothing can be built there unless it is on a 33 foot high berm until the levees are reinforced to the 100 year flood level. They were upgraded to 100 year status a decade or so ago, after a long dry spell during which the Natomas farmlands failed to flood, followed by an orgy of suburb and strip mall construction. Ten years and 100,000 residents later, the Army Corps of Engineers downgraded the levees, forcing a building moratorium. Of course, that didn't stop everyone: currently there is a scandal at City Hall, as a senior building official (who also happens to be the son of a city council member) hacked into the computer system to allow building permits to be started in the moratorium zone. Now the city may face the loss of federal assistance for levee construction, and dramatic increases in the cost of flood insurance, especially for people in parts of the city that are no longer considered safe from flooding--meaning Natomas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2009, 03:12 AM
 
Location: San Leandro
4,576 posts, read 9,159,751 times
Reputation: 3248
I don't know how out of touch some of you guys are with real estate listings but we got modest homes here in Granite bay that have been under 300k for quite some time. Plenty of 120k-150k homes in the older parts of roseville and rocklin and such. Antelope is a bargain right now.

Now the problem is financing. In this economy you are gonna need 50% down and squeaky clean credit to even compete with the specu-flippers who are ever so prevelant in the sub 400K housing stock.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2009, 03:58 AM
 
109 posts, read 377,625 times
Reputation: 73
At the price point, Kcummins is looking at in Sacramento, there are going to be some tradeoffs involved. Either she is going to buy a fixer upper, be living in a neighborhood with some crime issues or possibly buying a condo in a place mandating flood insurance. Activists complain about mandatory flood insurance because they want the feds to strengthen the levies. But its not that expensive (even in Natomas). In general in this area, I also think its just a good idea to have flood insurance given that we live next to two rivers, the region suffers from El Nino's on a regular basis (which also flood the regions creeks) and large parts of the region are built on former floodplains (downtown, the Pocket, Natomas, etc).

I don't live in Natomas but I bought flood insurance even though its not technically required for me to do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2009, 07:45 PM
 
1,020 posts, read 1,894,436 times
Reputation: 394
There are some really good deals right now on fixer uppers in this town. If you are willing to put in some sweat equity, you can do really well right now. Look for the 120k home in the best neighborhood you can find.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2009, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Granite Bay, Ca
16 posts, read 41,045 times
Reputation: 18
Default Rent month to month

I suspect that you won't have much trouble finding an area that you will like. Sacramento covers a large area and has lots of choices. When you are ready to buy, which in my opinion should not be until you have lived here for awhile and looked around quite abit, you will be able to make an informed decision. One sugjestion would be to look for areas where the schools are good. Just rent month to month when you get here and that way you can move if necessary. Best of luck
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2009, 06:43 PM
 
119 posts, read 517,988 times
Reputation: 63
I suspect for 120k you are going to have problems finding a place you will like.

The most recent Sacramento MLS puts the median price of single family home in this region at 185k. Its tough to buy a home for 2/3 of the median price in and find a home that is either not a major fixer upper or in a neighborhood with a lot of problems. In places outside of Sacramento like Texas or Kansas, 120k probably will get you something in a decent neighborhood. Here you are looking at problems.

http://www.sacrealtor.org/documents/...ctober2009.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 06:33 PM
 
142 posts, read 534,766 times
Reputation: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Minor View Post
At the price point, Kcummins is looking at in Sacramento, there are going to be some tradeoffs involved. Either she is going to buy a fixer upper, be living in a neighborhood with some crime issues or possibly buying a condo in a place mandating flood insurance. Activists complain about mandatory flood insurance because they want the feds to strengthen the levies. But its not that expensive (even in Natomas). In general in this area, I also think its just a good idea to have flood insurance given that we live next to two rivers, the region suffers from El Nino's on a regular basis (which also flood the regions creeks) and large parts of the region are built on former floodplains (downtown, the Pocket, Natomas, etc).

I don't live in Natomas but I bought flood insurance even though its not technically required for me to do so.

Article in the paper today put the cost of flood insurance in Natomas at 300 a year if you have the preferred risk policy and 1200 to 1300 a year for standard flood insurance.

Natomas homeowners may buy low-cost flood insurance until Jan. 6 - Sacramento Business, Housing Market News | Sacramento Bee (http://www.sacbee.com/business/story/2368519.html - broken link)

People spend more per year on lattes or cable tv.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top