Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > San Antonio
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-02-2009, 02:36 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
1,893 posts, read 5,593,895 times
Reputation: 1497

Advertisements

I was reading a thread recently where a poster was asking readers to consider his/her rep points when deciding how to view the content of the post. It occurred to me that this alone may not be a really good barometer of any given posters reputation. Someone who has a great many total posts will likely have a pretty high reputation count. Also anyone who has just become a member will receive an automatic 10 rep points on their first post. I think a better indicator would be a ratio of the number of post per rep. A lower number of course would be indicative of a higher reputation. I would deduct the 10 automatic reps. The equation would look like this. (Excuse my sphering, I'm no mathematician) Anyway. # of posts / (reps-10) = rep ratio. Mine, at this time, would look like this. 863 / (340-10) = 2.61. Or, on average, it took me 2.6 posts for every rep that I recieved. Try it! It's Fun! What's your Rep Ratio?

Everybody have a safe and Happy 4th of July!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-02-2009, 02:38 PM
 
Location: NW San Antonio
214 posts, read 502,459 times
Reputation: 128
Mine is 2.56 I was thinking about making a post like this. You beat me to it! Congrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 02:46 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
1,893 posts, read 5,593,895 times
Reputation: 1497
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reallybigshoe View Post
Mine is 2.56 I was thinking about making a post like this. You beat me to it! Congrats.
That's not what I get.
173 / (66-10) = 3.08
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 02:52 PM
 
Location: NW San Antonio
214 posts, read 502,459 times
Reputation: 128
Oh the minus ten! You're right.

They really ought to add in a bating average for us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Miami
888 posts, read 888,886 times
Reputation: 658
You can rep yourself as much as you want, no?
Just don't log in, and then view your posts - rep as you please.
I'm sure many do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 03:06 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
2,260 posts, read 5,622,824 times
Reputation: 1505
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyDaysCopenhagenSkoal View Post
You can rep yourself as much as you want, no?
Dude. TMI. Serously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 03:07 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
1,893 posts, read 5,593,895 times
Reputation: 1497
I just logged out and viewed this post but there was no option to rep or reply. I had to log in to do that.

LindaGrace....2.17. Not bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 03:13 PM
 
427 posts, read 1,175,222 times
Reputation: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnappyBob View Post
I was reading a thread recently where a poster was asking readers to consider his/her rep points when deciding how to view the content of the post. It occurred to me that this alone may not be a really good barometer of any given posters reputation. Someone who has a great many total posts will likely have a pretty high reputation count. Also anyone who has just become a member will receive an automatic 10 rep points on their first post. I think a better indicator would be a ratio of the number of post per rep. A lower number of course would be indicative of a higher reputation. I would deduct the 10 automatic reps. The equation would look like this. (Excuse my sphering, I'm no mathematician) Anyway. # of posts / (reps-10) = rep ratio. Mine, at this time, would look like this. 863 / (340-10) = 2.61. Or, on average, it took me 2.6 posts for every rep that I recieved. Try it! It's Fun! What's your Rep Ratio?

Everybody have a safe and Happy 4th of July!
Rated this post positively
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 03:17 PM
 
Location: SoCal-So Proud!
4,263 posts, read 10,833,491 times
Reputation: 1558
Dilligaf?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 03:20 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
1,893 posts, read 5,593,895 times
Reputation: 1497
Quote:
Originally Posted by firstclassflyer View Post
Dilligaf?
I guess not at 3.52.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > San Antonio
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top