Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-15-2012, 01:20 AM
 
224 posts, read 454,529 times
Reputation: 130

Advertisements

I was looking at apartments/studios on craigslist and it looks like pacific heights is cheaper than North Beach/Telegraph hill?! I thought Pacific Heights was supposed to be the priciest and ritziest place in SF? How is the availability in Pacific Heights versus North Beach/Telegraph Hill? I am a single male in my mid to late twenties, without pets, is that going to help or hurt my chances, or does it even matter as long as I fit the salary requirements and have decent credit?

Last edited by luau; 10-15-2012 at 01:36 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-15-2012, 02:49 AM
 
Location: South Korea
5,242 posts, read 13,076,984 times
Reputation: 2958
Quote:
Originally Posted by luau View Post
I was looking at apartments/studios on craigslist and it looks like pacific heights is cheaper than North Beach/Telegraph hill?! I thought Pacific Heights was supposed to be the priciest and ritziest place in SF? How is the availability in Pacific Heights versus North Beach/Telegraph Hill?
My guess is that you're seeing listings that aren't in the ritzy parts of Pacific Heights, but are in places like around Van Ness or in Lower Pacific Heights or in the outer Western Addition. Landlords in SF like to lie about the neighborhood an apartment is, like you'll see a lot of places listed as "downtown" or "Union Square" that are in the armpit of the Tenderloin.

North Beach definitely can be expensive, it's close to downtown so a lot of high-priced lawyers and so on live there. And Telegraph Hill is covered with multi-million dollar houses, so rent there is really going to be high.


Quote:
I am a single male in my mid to late twenties, without pets, is that going to help or hurt my chances, or does it even matter as long as I fit the salary requirements and have decent credit?
All they care about is whether you have a job and good credit and can afford the rent. Any pets will disqualify you from most apartments in SF so you're good there. It's still very competitive to get a place though, you just have to keep going to viewings and applying for places.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2012, 05:34 PM
 
484 posts, read 822,186 times
Reputation: 494
I think there's a greater supply of apartments in Pac Heights, which would translate to a lower rent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2012, 11:07 PM
JL
 
8,522 posts, read 14,534,042 times
Reputation: 7936
I noticed on my vacation there last week that it was very quiet around Union St/Montgomery...near Coit Tower....don't know how much the homes cost, but it was really nice. Residents must feel relieved about it not being so noisy with tourists. It must also be a nightmare for people who live on the crookedest street(Lombard). There were hundreds of tourists around that area for hours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 01:45 PM
 
56 posts, read 117,620 times
Reputation: 92
Pac Heights is one of the geographically larger neighborhoods of the city. You might see places advertised as "Pac Heights" that range anywhere as southeast as say, Franklin & Bush all the way as northwest as say, Lyon & Green. You could have endless arguments about what actually qualifies as "Pac Heights" and what is instead The Fillmore, Cow Hollow, Laurel Heights, Polk Gulch, etc...but regardless, fact is that because Pac Heights is known as a desirable neighborhood, real estate agents and landlords will always try to classify a place as "Pac Heights" even if its a huge stretch.

There's actually a wide range of housing options in Pac Heights - the street I live on in "Lower" Pac Heights looks solidly middle-class (by SF standards)...but if you go a few blocks up the hill (north), you get into ridiculous multi-million dollar mansions. Generally (and this is a very rough rule of thumb), it gets less expensive the further west you go, as you get gradually further from downtown (and thus longer commute for most office-workers), and slightly cooler/foggier as you get closer to the beach.

I used to live in North Beach, and I do miss it - I think North Beach is a livelier neighborhood, more walkable, easier access to downtown, whole lot of character...but I really am starting to enjoy Pac Heights, a lot. You get much less of the bum/crazy person factor, its much cleaner, quieter, and safer than North Beach, you don't get the tour buses and segway tours rolling through non-stop in the summertime like you do in NB, the streets and houses are beautiful and perfect for strolling on a nice day, you see a whole lot more families....And you can still get to the Presidio and the waterfront relatively easily, its still relatively "central" to other parts of SF, plenty of nice food and drink options on Fillmore & Divisadero streets.

If you are just moving here though, into the bar scene, looking to make friends, I'd suggest North Beach. But Pac Heights wouldn't be bad either - just a bit sleepier. I had my fun in North Beach and now anytime I want that again I just take a quick bus ride over and cab it home at the end of the night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 09:15 PM
 
224 posts, read 454,529 times
Reputation: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hard8 View Post
Pac Heights is one of the geographically larger neighborhoods of the city. You might see places advertised as "Pac Heights" that range anywhere as southeast as say, Franklin & Bush all the way as northwest as say, Lyon & Green. You could have endless arguments about what actually qualifies as "Pac Heights" and what is instead The Fillmore, Cow Hollow, Laurel Heights, Polk Gulch, etc...but regardless, fact is that because Pac Heights is known as a desirable neighborhood, real estate agents and landlords will always try to classify a place as "Pac Heights" even if its a huge stretch.

There's actually a wide range of housing options in Pac Heights - the street I live on in "Lower" Pac Heights looks solidly middle-class (by SF standards)...but if you go a few blocks up the hill (north), you get into ridiculous multi-million dollar mansions. Generally (and this is a very rough rule of thumb), it gets less expensive the further west you go, as you get gradually further from downtown (and thus longer commute for most office-workers), and slightly cooler/foggier as you get closer to the beach.

I used to live in North Beach, and I do miss it - I think North Beach is a livelier neighborhood, more walkable, easier access to downtown, whole lot of character...but I really am starting to enjoy Pac Heights, a lot. You get much less of the bum/crazy person factor, its much cleaner, quieter, and safer than North Beach, you don't get the tour buses and segway tours rolling through non-stop in the summertime like you do in NB, the streets and houses are beautiful and perfect for strolling on a nice day, you see a whole lot more families....And you can still get to the Presidio and the waterfront relatively easily, its still relatively "central" to other parts of SF, plenty of nice food and drink options on Fillmore & Divisadero streets.

If you are just moving here though, into the bar scene, looking to make friends, I'd suggest North Beach. But Pac Heights wouldn't be bad either - just a bit sleepier. I had my fun in North Beach and now anytime I want that again I just take a quick bus ride over and cab it home at the end of the night.
Thanks for you insight. I'm surprised to hear that North Beach has more young people considering it's more expensive.

I know someone who lives in Pac Heights and I've walked through that area a bit. I never saw any mansions though, not until I got to the Marina area where the wealthy live.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 10:08 AM
 
56 posts, read 117,620 times
Reputation: 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by luau View Post
Thanks for you insight. I'm surprised to hear that North Beach has more young people considering it's more expensive.

I know someone who lives in Pac Heights and I've walked through that area a bit. I never saw any mansions though, not until I got to the Marina area where the wealthy live.
For any 20-something that lives in North Beach, I'd say there's about a 95% chance they live with roommates. I personally know about 20-30 people that live in the neighborhood, and only one of them lives alone - and she's been in her rent-controlled apartment for several years now.

To see the Pac Heights mansions, take a stroll down Broadway between Divisadero and Lyon. They are hard to miss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top