Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2013, 12:04 PM
 
99 posts, read 386,798 times
Reputation: 61

Advertisements

Just reading this article about the new-rich choosing to live in the mission district: Valentine’s Day miracle? Mission District poised to be SF’s most desired neighborhood | On The Block | an SFGate.com blog

I have no idea how people buy houses in SF, I am a software engineer & married....doubt I could afford anything over 300k...maybe 350k at a push. In other-words my maximum budget is no more than a deposit on these properties.....seems like no matter how hard or long I work, I will never be able to afford a modern / kind-of-cool house like the ones featured in the article....or much else for that matter.

I would love to live here long term, but at some point I need to start building equity / stop wasting cash on rent.

These home prices are pushing a million $.....it might as well be a billion as far as I'm concerned, it feels like a hopeless situation as far as owning a house is concerned.

Has anyone else been in this situation / managed to get onto the property ladder in SF with a "budget"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2013, 12:21 PM
 
Location: San Jose, CA
7,688 posts, read 29,159,353 times
Reputation: 3631
San Francisco has 800k people and 2-3 million more who would take their place at the drop of a hat if it was affordable. There's no population growth to speak of, because essentially no new housing can be put in, and yet the demand keeps growing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, CA
2,518 posts, read 4,012,077 times
Reputation: 624
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishman_irl View Post
Just reading this article about the new-rich choosing to live in the mission district: Valentine’s Day miracle? Mission District poised to be SF’s most desired neighborhood | On The Block | an SFGate.com blog

I have no idea how people buy houses in SF, I am a software engineer & married....doubt I could afford anything over 300k...maybe 350k at a push. In other-words my maximum budget is no more than a deposit on these properties.....seems like no matter how hard or long I work, I will never be able to afford a modern / kind-of-cool house like the ones featured in the article....or much else for that matter.

I would love to live here long term, but at some point I need to start building equity / stop wasting cash on rent.

These home prices are pushing a million $.....it might as well be a billion as far as I'm concerned, it feels like a hopeless situation as far as owning a house is concerned.

Has anyone else been in this situation / managed to get onto the property ladder in SF with a "budget"?
That's one of the things that has changed in the Bay Area over the past 15-20 years. Back when I bought in Lafayette (still considered high end during that time), median home prices were roughly 3.5-4.0 times the median income of the area. Now? It's closer to 10x.

Same with S.F, San Mateo, Atherton, Palo Alto, etc. Any desirable area in the Bay Area is completely above what could be considered affordable for a single income family. Even the 2nd/3rd tier places like Fremont, or Milpitas. About the only affordable places left for single income earners are in Solano County pretty much.

That's why when people post here "Hey I'm making $50,000 in Farmtown, Iowa, and I want to move to S.F for a job that offers $90,000 a year, is it worth it?", I usually try to paint a picture of housing cost first so people understand that it's super affordable in that respect so any "gain" in salary would be offset by the amount of house you can afford.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 12:57 PM
 
99 posts, read 386,798 times
Reputation: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonarrat View Post
San Francisco has 800k people and 2-3 million more who would take their place at the drop of a hat if it was affordable. There's no population growth to speak of, because essentially no new housing can be put in, and yet the demand keeps growing.
I hear what your saying, but what kind of money are homeowners in SF earning to be able to afford these houses....I could double my salary and I would be no closer to being able to afford anything. It's pretty much the same story down in Silicon Valley.....80 year old, dilapidated homes going for 7 figures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 01:03 PM
 
24,409 posts, read 26,971,175 times
Reputation: 19998
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishman_irl View Post
Just reading this article about the new-rich choosing to live in the mission district: Valentine’s Day miracle? Mission District poised to be SF’s most desired neighborhood | On The Block | an SFGate.com blog

I have no idea how people buy houses in SF, I am a software engineer & married....doubt I could afford anything over 300k...maybe 350k at a push. In other-words my maximum budget is no more than a deposit on these properties.....seems like no matter how hard or long I work, I will never be able to afford a modern / kind-of-cool house like the ones featured in the article....or much else for that matter.

I would love to live here long term, but at some point I need to start building equity / stop wasting cash on rent.

These home prices are pushing a million $.....it might as well be a billion as far as I'm concerned, it feels like a hopeless situation as far as owning a house is concerned.

Has anyone else been in this situation / managed to get onto the property ladder in SF with a "budget"?
You can own property here for $350k, but you'll have to choose a less desirable neighborhood or a small condo. It's tough to swallow sometimes when you think about it because $1 million would buy you a beautiful state of the art mansion in many parts of the US. There is simply more demand than supply in San Francisco and no land to expand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, CA
2,518 posts, read 4,012,077 times
Reputation: 624
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
You can own property here for $350k, but you'll have to choose a less desirable neighborhood or a small condo. It's tough to swallow sometimes when you think about it because $1 million would buy you a beautiful state of the art mansion in many parts of the US. There is simply more demand than supply in San Francisco and no land to expand.
Pretty much.

Also rents are in the stratosphere. One of my units in South Beach 1br/1bath, I was able to rent it out for over $4,000/month and had 30+ applications. S.F needs to build upward basically, like Manhattan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 01:09 PM
 
99 posts, read 386,798 times
Reputation: 61
The only house I'm seeing on craigslist for < $350k is a house-boat on pier39
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 01:10 PM
 
24,409 posts, read 26,971,175 times
Reputation: 19998
Quote:
Originally Posted by DocGoldstein View Post
Pretty much.

Also rents are in the stratosphere. One of my units in South Beach 1br/1bath, I was able to rent it out for over $4,000/month and had 30+ applications. S.F needs to build upward basically, like Manhattan.
That's incredible! Good for you though lol. I agree that building vertical is really the only option left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 01:11 PM
 
24,409 posts, read 26,971,175 times
Reputation: 19998
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishman_irl View Post
The only house I'm seeing on craigslist for < $350k is a house-boat on pier39
mod cut

Last edited by Sam I Am; 02-14-2013 at 03:17 PM.. Reason: Sorry, you may use Realtor.com but not other realty companies
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 01:20 PM
 
24,409 posts, read 26,971,175 times
Reputation: 19998
mod cut

Homes go fast at this price range, but new inventory is constantly being added. You should also consider Daly City as a cheaper alternative too.

Last edited by Sam I Am; 02-14-2013 at 03:17 PM.. Reason: orphaned - the post you refer to has been deleted
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top