Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-20-2017, 09:13 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,663,382 times
Reputation: 13635

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WizardOfRadical View Post
You seem to have an unhealthy obsession of places with better looking people.

Rather than obsess about LA, you should ask why BART already needs another vote for money, or why BART is staffing stations that do not have service.

LA's heavy rail already had more people riding per mile than BART. Enjoy the crumbling system
I was simply pointing out the heavy rail system with the most "insane" operational costs since that is what was being discussed. Not sure why that gets you all riled up..

Once again you clearly don't know what you're taking about and just make up stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-20-2017, 10:56 PM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,814 posts, read 4,012,586 times
Reputation: 3284
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
I was simply pointing out the heavy rail system with the most "insane" operational costs since that is what was being discussed. Not sure why that gets you all riled up..

Once again you clearly don't know what you're taking about and just make up stuff.
No, you are right Bart has sane operating costs. Cancel that bond everyone! Sav has discovered that Bart is fiscally solvent and does not need money!


LOL!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2017, 10:59 PM
 
Location: Marin County, CA
787 posts, read 644,585 times
Reputation: 869
Not In My Back Yard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2017, 02:10 AM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,912,422 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGoodUsernamesWereTaken View Post
Not In My Back Yard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!


What are you responding to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2017, 05:48 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,663,382 times
Reputation: 13635
Quote:
Originally Posted by WizardOfRadical View Post
No, you are right Bart has sane operating costs. Cancel that bond everyone! Sav has discovered that Bart is fiscally solvent and does not need money!


LOL!!!!!!!!
I never claimed or suggested BART didn't desperately need money for capital needs. I was simply pointing out it's operating costs aren't really "insane" at all when compared to other heavy rail operators.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top