Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-26-2017, 10:42 AM
 
424 posts, read 1,479,577 times
Reputation: 154

Advertisements

> Cross posting since my question relates to moving and living in the city of SF as well (//www.city-data.com/forum/san-j...-dc-metro.html).
> If this is considered bad practice, or if I should not have done it, my apologies (and happy to delete the post).

Early 40s, technology person (so finding something to do in the Bay Area wouldn’t be a problem).

Don’t need to worry about a good schooling district, just need a nice, little, safe place for wife and I.

How do the technology salaries compare between these areas and how much more should I make on the dollar to maintain the same standard of living (as in a DC suburb)? And is contracting work just as common in the valley as it is in the DC Metro?

I don’t like commuting (not one bit), and a primary purpose of the move it to live closer to (yet to be found) work, find it easy to switch jobs or contracts, continue to live closer to work and absorb the technological progress in the valley (miss the notion of start ups and exhilarating work in the DC Metro - not the easiest to find).

Would you recommend a relocation from the DC Metro to the Bay Area for someone like I at this point in my career? I’ve always wanted to live in the Silicon Valley but it just didn’t work out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-26-2017, 03:09 PM
 
Location: America's Expensive Toilet
1,516 posts, read 1,248,990 times
Reputation: 3195
Quote:
Originally Posted by vauser View Post
How do the technology salaries compare between these areas and how much more should I make on the dollar to maintain the same standard of living (as in a DC suburb)? And is contracting work just as common in the valley as it is in the DC Metro?

I don’t like commuting (not one bit), and a primary purpose of the move it to live closer to (yet to be found) work, find it easy to switch jobs or contracts, continue to live closer to work and absorb the technological progress in the valley (miss the notion of start ups and exhilarating work in the DC Metro - not the easiest to find).

Would you recommend a relocation from the DC Metro to the Bay Area for someone like I at this point in my career? I’ve always wanted to live in the Silicon Valley but it just didn’t work out.
Do you want to live in San Francisco or Silicon Valley? They are two very different animals. Tech salaries depend on what your job is and what kind of company you work at. Larger companies might pay you more than a startup, so it's hard to say what the salary offer might be. Having worked at both larger companies and startups, I'll be the first to say startups are not all the media makes them out to be. My experience out here has mostly been a bunch of inexperienced twenty-somethings with zero concept of how to run a company and have a proper work-life balance. If they try to pull you in with stock options, those are typically worthless.

If your primary reason for moving is shorter commute, I think that's a poor reason to move. You will either pay top dollar or you will live in a more reasonably priced area and make a grueling commute. There's not really an in-between. Some of my friends live 20 miles from work and yet still spend an hour+ commuting (suburbs). Another example is if you worked in Downtown SF and lived nearby, you would probably be looking at $3200+ /month for a one bedroom unit in the vicinity. In the Valley the rents might be slightly cheaper but your commute will likely be much longer because Caltrain and BART don't have as many stops (car is rarely faster). Personally, I feel like Silicon Valley is just overpriced suburbs.

Contract work is common out here. However, in that case you might not always get work near home. Would you move closer to each new contract or deal with a longer commute? I am not willing to commute 1.5-2 hrs each way, thus options are limited.

If your main reason for moving cross-country is to shorten your commute, don't move. If you have other reasons such as career growth opportunities, a need for drastic change of scenery or lifestyle change, etc. those might warrant such a move.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2017, 07:33 PM
 
Location: U.S.A.
72 posts, read 81,695 times
Reputation: 141
Hi vauser,
Washington, DC is a great, clean city (please don't ever forget that while California,...hmmm, is 'adventurous'. Nice folks though.
In the Bay area you won't see much 'open' space areas like you do in DC but many of these areas feel very cozy (like Palo Alto, Los Altos, Denville, etc... for example) with great weather. Silicon Valley IS a good place to boost your career and meet the best but it comes at the HIGH cost of living expense (you will read all about it on City Data) and not so good transportation arrangements.

Moving from DC to SV may not be an economical move but if you don't have kids yet this might be a nice thing to 'try and see'. In SV you need to shoot for a near 150K salary/per person (if you can) to feel comfortable.

Please also consider South California as well (San Diego or Pasadena, CA or Ventura County cities (60 miles north of LA)

Good luck!

Last edited by Novatoman; 11-26-2017 at 08:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2017, 11:12 PM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
28,226 posts, read 36,883,248 times
Reputation: 28563
You probably need something along the lines of 1.5 to 1.75X to have similar quality of life in the Bay Area. Maybe even a bit more. Housing quality will be a lot crappier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 09:52 AM
 
636 posts, read 612,295 times
Reputation: 953
Don't move to the DC uuuuurea to avoid commuting, especially as a contractor. You will most likely immediately regret it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 12:46 PM
 
Location: SW King County, WA
6,416 posts, read 8,280,262 times
Reputation: 6595
I wouldn't do it unless you'll get a big bump in pay. Bay Area traffic is actually worse than DC's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 01:08 PM
 
Location: Cole Valley, CA
830 posts, read 486,919 times
Reputation: 1549
Quote:
Originally Posted by vauser View Post
a primary purpose of the move it to live closer to (yet to be found) work, find it easy to switch jobs or contracts, continue to live closer to work and absorb the technological progress in the valley (miss the notion of start ups and exhilarating work in the DC Metro - not the easiest to find).
Hmmmm....it might just be easier to go through the trouble of relocating or getting a new job in the DC area if your primary reason for considering a move is reducing the commute.

I am not sure what your area of tech is, but I consider the Bay area tech scene to have two primary areas; SF and the Valley. San Francisco has Salesforce, Twitter, AirBnB, Pinterest, a few others, and scores of startups. If you live and work in the city, your commute will probably be not bad, or can even be a short 15 minute walk or train ride. Silicon Valley includes San Jose and most of the towns on the peninsula from San Jose up to San Francisco. Google, Apple, Oracle, Facebook, and countless midsized tech companies and startups.

Working at the larger companies, you definitely get a higher effective salary, especially due to the perks and benefits. Most of them pay your phone and/or Internet service, include gym memberships and fitness reimbursements for golf, massage, skiing, etc. and include free lunches and happy hours. Pretty good work/life balance as well.

IMO, the only real advantages to startups are 1) More cutting edge tech, so a better place to develop skills and nerd-out, it can almost be like a more real-world version of grad school 2) the chance to "make it big" if the company does well, and 3) more of a "team" feeling with your coworkers. But you'll almost definitely get less money per-unit of effort (unless the company does really well) and not as much work/life balance.

Commuting wise, living and working in SF is much easier. There are some commutes in the peninsula that are not too bad, but it is much more variable. Some of the mid to large sized companies run comfortable commuter buses with WiFi to SF and other towns in the area, but you're still spending time commuting.

Overall, I guess I would not recommend it unless you are looking for a change of pace or wanting to move here for other reasons in addition, or if you are early enough in your career and want to gain experience with the latest cutting-edge technologies in the real world to boost your earning potential.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 05:01 PM
 
Location: Northern California
130,332 posts, read 12,112,869 times
Reputation: 39038
Commutes & traffic in the Bay area are awful, that is a reason for many to move out. Like others have said, if you have other reasons, then go for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 08:24 PM
 
32 posts, read 32,253 times
Reputation: 50
As someone who has lived in both D.C. and the Bay Area, I would not recommend the move. D.C. is so much nicer in literally every way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 09:36 PM
 
Location: SW King County, WA
6,416 posts, read 8,280,262 times
Reputation: 6595
Not in 'literally every way', no. I grew up in FFX County and you couldn't pay me to move back to the area.

The weather in DC is nothing to brag about, people are generally not as pleasant/nice, it's hyper competitive, traffic is horrendous, and also very, very expensive. It's funny, but the things I hate about DC are now the biggest gripes I have with the Bay Area.

If you've got a family though, DC makes a lot more sense. Housing is MUCH, MUCH better, along with excellent public schools. I'd also take a high paying gov't job over a high paying tech job, personally.

If you are single (or DINKS) and outdoorsy, the Bay Area is a much better place to live than DC, because it offers so much more to do outside. That is, of course, assuming you have the time to get out and enjoy it, which a lot of people don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top