Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-12-2012, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Israel
165 posts, read 200,887 times
Reputation: 75

Advertisements

Occam's Razor and the Special Theory of Relativity.
1.
In 1905 Einstein wrote the paper:
“ On the Electrodynamics of moving Bodies.” ( SRT).
He wrote about moving of ‘Electrodynamics Bodies’ (!)
It means he wrote about particles like quantum of light, electron. (!)
And this movement is going in a negative 4D continuum.
2.
One postulate of SRT says: the speed of quantum
of light in a vacuum is a constant ( c=1).
3
Another postulate of SRT says that motion, every motion (!),
(even including the motion of quantum of light ) is relative. (!)
4.
One postulate of SRT says the speed of quantum
of light is going in a vacuum.
Minkowski, trying to understand Einstein’s idea, decided to take
time as a fourth coordinate and created his negative spacetime
4D continuum.
What is negative 4D spacetime continuum really?
Really the negative spacetime 4D continuum is vacuum.
Why?
Because only vacuum has negative parameter ( negative temperature )
and only in vacuum the space and time tied together in unrequited continuum.
===.
My conclusion.
Einstein’s SRT explains the behavior of light quanta in vacuum.
=====.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus
=========================..
P.S.
"Einstein's special theory of relativity is based on two postulates:
One is the relativity of motion, and the second is the constancy
and universality of the speed of light.
Could the first postulate be true and the other false?
If that was not possible, Einstein would not have had to make two
postulates. But I don't think many people realized until recently
that you could have a consistent theory in which you changed only
the second postulate."
/ Lee Smolin, The Trouble With Physics, p. 226. /

===.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2012, 09:34 PM
 
Location: Israel
165 posts, read 200,887 times
Reputation: 75
The question is:
Can quantum of light change its constant speed ?[/SIZE]
======.

Faster-than-light.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light[

etc . . .

===.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2012, 09:52 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,198,598 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by s0cratus View Post
The question is:
Can quantum of light change its constant speed ?[/SIZE]
======.

Faster-than-light.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light[

etc . . .

===.
Let me google that for you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2012, 06:46 AM
 
2,182 posts, read 5,438,343 times
Reputation: 1214
Someone watched big bang theory last night......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2012, 09:48 PM
 
Location: Israel
165 posts, read 200,887 times
Reputation: 75
The book: Albert Einstein and the Cosmic World Order.
/ Six lectures delivered at the University
of Michigan in the Spring of 1962 /
by Cornelius Lanczos / The lecture № 3 /
=============.
Cornelius Lanczos (served as assistant to Einstein during
the period 1928–29 ) wrote:
SRT was created on two postulates.
First postulate – there isn’t absolute speed of movement.
Every movement is relative.
Second postulate – the speed of light ( quantum of light)
is constant.
Lanczos wrote: from the first point of viewit seems that
to unite these two different postulates is impossible,
trying to do this is absolute nonsense. (!)
But . . . . It was be done. (!)
Einstein made it. (!)
. . It was needed the Einstein’s courage to do this unity. (!)
How did Einstein connected them ? (!)
1
He solved this problem saying that Newton’s absolute space
and time are relative.
And they can be unite in negative spacetime - 4D.
2
As the result we can see different occurrences :
( for example: the physical parameters of particles can change )
==.
And Lanczos wrote: now we are accustomed to this conception
and never, not for the world give up from such manner of thinking.
==================.
Very well ! !
There is only small problem in this conception:
What is the negative 4D spacetime ?
Nobody knows.
! !
===.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2012, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Israel
165 posts, read 200,887 times
Reputation: 75
1.
A New Limit on Photon Mass.
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/625-2.html
2.
Every sentence I utter
not as an affirmation but as a question

/ Niels Bohr./

===.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top