Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
 [Register]
Seattle area Seattle and King County Suburbs
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-08-2014, 09:10 PM
 
6,893 posts, read 8,929,483 times
Reputation: 3506

Advertisements

I'm guessing only that Kirkland is nice, cute, and some upscale.
Redmond similar, with a more urban like downtown.
Kenmore more sterile. Any connection to Sears? Seems Redmond and Kirkland have better stores etc.
?Bothell
Which are worse schools?
More poor socio-economic issues?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-08-2014, 09:20 PM
 
5,075 posts, read 11,067,856 times
Reputation: 4669
Kirkland is considered more upscale, it has parts along Lake Washington where that reputation is justified, and it has other areas where it's not much different from other lowland suburbs.

Kenmore is transitional. It has lakefront, and it has previously unincorporated areas that built up in an unorganized fashion.

Redmond and Bothell are huge. Neither have land that is particularly spectacular (lake mountain sound) except for a few pockets near Lake Sammamish in Redmond. Redmond is closer to Microsoft, so more upscale development centered around it.

None of them have an urban downtown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 09:36 PM
 
262 posts, read 307,539 times
Reputation: 579
Redmond is working on a more urban downtown feel with tons of high rise condos under construction near Redmond Town Center. I'm wondering who is going to fill all of the units.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 10:10 PM
 
6,893 posts, read 8,929,483 times
Reputation: 3506
^ Microsoft employees?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 11:31 PM
 
1,314 posts, read 2,053,513 times
Reputation: 1995
Kirkland: Most quaint, upscale, waterfront, nice schools
Redmond: Microsofties, a little sterile, but clean/safe and decent schools
Bothell: Good investment, some good schools, affordable, old downtown is being built out
Kenmore: Except for spots of waterfront...meh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 11:38 PM
 
9,618 posts, read 27,330,094 times
Reputation: 5382
Kirkland- It's big, and various neighborhoods are very different from each other. Downtown is very nice/quaint, and Juanita's nice too. Kingsgate has a lot of crummy 1970's apartments and condos.
Kenmore- I wouldn't call it sterile, more like a 1950's suburb.
Redmond-Surprisingly good places to eat.
Bothell- A mixture of nice new houses, kind of nice old downtown, and some beat up parts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2014, 08:28 AM
 
Location: Kirkland, WA (Metro Seattle)
6,033 posts, read 6,141,242 times
Reputation: 12524
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloom View Post
I'm guessing only that Kirkland is nice, cute, and some upscale.
Redmond similar, with a more urban like downtown.
Kenmore more sterile. Any connection to Sears? Seems Redmond and Kirkland have better stores etc.
?Bothell
Which are worse schools?
More poor socio-economic issues?
1) Yes, yes, and depends on the neighborhood. NorKirk has $2M renovations or new construction next to old cottages that need to be bulldozed. I find it rather endearing, was just yesterday looking at three adjacent modern homes with three distinct architectural styles: one Spanish, like you'd see in say La Jolla. The second brick, definitely East or specifically New England. The third classic PacNW c. post War boom. All renovated tastefully. Less disjointed than...interesting. The six-cars-in-the-yard, barking pitbull on a chain places are slowly but surely being bought-out, YoY.

2) Yes, if "urban-like" means busy main streets with shopping plazas. There are a couple "downtown" streets with a bit smaller feel, but it's all part of the whole.

3) Probably yes. Depends what you call "better" stores.

4) Bothell has a couple downtown streets with rather cute businesses. Best darn cafe for miles around there, too (Alexa's).

What "poor socio-economic issues?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2014, 08:57 AM
 
236 posts, read 289,240 times
Reputation: 184
I have given up trying to categorize schools in a city as all nice or all bad. You probably want to look at the schools individually.

Also, hard to know what you mean by worse schools. If you mean test scores, that information is available at greatschools.com. If you mean socioeconomic demographics, that information is on the school district's website. If you mean caring teachers, no bullying, and involved parents.... That's a little harder to obtain so if you find it, please share
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2014, 09:35 AM
 
236 posts, read 289,240 times
Reputation: 184
Re: stores, Redmond and Kirkland are the only ones with Trader Joes. North Kirkland has Fred Meyers, Redmond has Fred Meyers and Target on Avondale, South Bothell has a Target close by in Woodinville. I think that unless you go into more rural Redmond, or Bothell there plenty of grocery stores around.

Boutique stores are mainly in downtown Kirkland. Redmond has Redmond Town Center which is an outdoor mall with Macy's, Eddie Bauer etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2014, 10:28 AM
 
6,893 posts, read 8,929,483 times
Reputation: 3506
Thanks all so far - very helpful
Stores (imo):
Good - Trader Joes, Costco, Coffee sandwich Cafes, Real bagel shops; Real pizza parlors
Not so good - QFC, Safeway, Petco, most restaurant chains - TGIF, Olive G, pizza chains, most corporate fast food
Blah, meh - Target
Poor socioeconomic (undesirable permutation of the following) - poor community feeling, low income, homeless, drugs, run down, crime, poor schools in terms of caring, test scores, community investment, parental involvement, lousy teachers, non-holistic, teach to test only, non-extracurricular
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top