Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
 [Register]
Seattle area Seattle and King County Suburbs
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: do you support the cap gains tax?
No, no state cap gains tax period. 24 64.86%
Yes, but only if the 9.9% & $100,000 numbers are negotiated downward. 1 2.70%
Yes, but only if it can be crafted in such a way to absolutely guarantee no upward creep of the 9.9%/$100,000 levels. 5 13.51%
Yes, pass Gov. Inslee's proposal as it stands. 6 16.22%
Other (please explain below). 1 2.70%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-01-2019, 02:15 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
6,061 posts, read 2,013,281 times
Reputation: 2167

Advertisements

The governor and state legislature have proposed a tax of 9.9% on cap gains income over $100,000 for individuals, $200,000 for joint filers. Capital gains can be loosely defined as investment income from sales of capital assets such as stocks, real estate, etc.

Economists have long believed that the optimal cap gains tax rate is zero. All of business basically runs on credit, since production and costs generally precede sales and profits. 'Capital' is another way of saying 'business credit.' If you tax capital, you get less business activity and less job growth. If the state needs more revenue, which it does not, a straight income tax would be less damaging.

This tax almost certainly violates the state Constitution, which prohibits income taxes. The legislature is playing a cute game of semantics by claiming that it's an excise tax, which it is not:
https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion...an-income-tax/
Of course, given the recent history of State Supreme Court decisions based on partisanship rather than law, the Constitution might not matter.

The IRS and all 50 state revenue agencies define the cap gains tax as an income tax. If it were an excise tax, they would have to tax a percentage of the value of the asset, not a percentage of the gain (income).

What do you think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-01-2019, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Embarrassing, WA
3,405 posts, read 2,737,856 times
Reputation: 4417
This state walks all over it's citizens rights, worse than California according to several sources. I have no doubt they will try to pass something that violates the constitution, and "loosely defined" is a legislators favorite words. Then they can "legislate" changes to the law once in place allowing more and more taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2019, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
6,061 posts, read 2,013,281 times
Reputation: 2167
Note--I screwed up with option #2, which says "Yes, but only if the 9.9% & $100,000 numbers are negotiated downward. "

Should have said--'only if the 9.9% is negotiated down, and/or the $100,000 is negotiated upward.' Please interpret this option as the above revised wording.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2019, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
6,061 posts, read 2,013,281 times
Reputation: 2167
BTW, whether you support or don't, call or email your legislators to let them know. This is an important vote. They can be reached at 1-800-562-6000. If you don't know the names of your particular reps, they can look them up for you base on your address.

Legislative Information Center Contacting Your Legislators
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2019, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
6,061 posts, read 2,013,281 times
Reputation: 2167
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkcarguy View Post
This state walks all over it's citizens rights, worse than California according to several sources. I have no doubt they will try to pass something that violates the constitution, and "loosely defined" is a legislators favorite words. Then they can "legislate" changes to the law once in place allowing more and more taxes.
This upward drift was exactly what happened with the federal income tax. When proposed in 1913, it was sold on the basis of low rates that would impact only the very wealthy. The top rate was 7%. Over the decades that was ratcheted upwards.

This is exactly what Gov. Inslee is doing here--selling it on the basis of 'wealthy only,' with, as far as I can tell, no guarantee against future increases to affect the middle class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2019, 01:14 AM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,935,688 times
Reputation: 4943
If the state can’t get enough revenue from our sales tax then perhaps we should switch over to a value added tax?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2019, 02:57 AM
 
Location: Metro Seattle Area - Born and Raised
4,910 posts, read 2,062,076 times
Reputation: 8668
Classic bait and switch tactic... Which 90% of the people will fall for since they will be led to believe that "it only hurts the rich" and "it's time for the rich to pay up." But!! In a few short years, it will include the middle class and the working class who are barely making it now in Western Washington.

...Yeah, let's support another tax that the middle class will have to pony up!! That's how I feel when it's time to renew the registration on my Jeep GC to support ST3 since people thought that it was a good ideal until it hit them in the wallet.

Please remember this. The rich can do what the middle class can't do... Move out of State on short notice!! With that said, just remember that once the rich flee the State, who will be require to step up to pay for this tax... Hint... You and me, the average working "Joes."

Governor Inslee, please don't help me!!

P.S. If you're a rich progressive type of guy/gal, please feel free to write the State Treasurer a check if you're fine paying more and more taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2019, 07:50 AM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
426 posts, read 527,440 times
Reputation: 811
Exactly, the concern here shouldn't be who this impacts directly, but how this indirectly affects the entire state (everyone) as it scales out through the economy.

Common sense tells you it will drive out wealthier people, triggering negative impact on business. It's also a deterrent to new companies, which hurts growth. Why some lawmakers are unable to consider the broader, long-term effects is beyond me. They just have a narrowly focused mindset that leads them to believe collecting more money is the solution to everything.

If they could pass a law that required government to check their current spending was done efficiently and effectively, everyone would get the results they wanted, but government and socialism can't drive this sort of behavior.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2019, 08:05 AM
 
Location: suburbs of seattle
147 posts, read 167,952 times
Reputation: 111
"Capital gains can be loosely defined as investment income from sales of capital assets such as stocks, real estate, etc."

so we already pay an excise tax on the sale of Real Estate. And already pay capital gains on profit from 2nd vacation homes.

Is this in addition?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2019, 08:07 AM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
426 posts, read 527,440 times
Reputation: 811
For all the socialist advocates out there, take a look at how socialist GDP compares to the United States. Most of those countries depend on the innovation from our country.

Socialism can solve problems in the short-term, but it create new ones. We already know the long-term effects socialism has on a country. History shows us that. Given the United States is a super power, we can't afford to lose our GDP because it makes us susceptible to competing super-powers, risking our way of life, and our ability to create socialist-like laws in the first place.

We shouldn't take for granted what our current system offers, which is unmatched in history. The recent interest in socialism in this country is absolutely baffling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top