Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Amazing how quiet you remain when Obamacare and other topics are being disscussed. Looks like I'm not making any factual errors there.
I didn't knwo FSU was playing still but my point in the main remains. The top ACC programs historically and this year were out of the tournament.
I didn't watch NIT , only posted this to annoy SC fans.
I'm a South Carolina fan and it didn't annoy me. I was actually glad you posted it because I hadn't been keeping up with the NIT tournament as much as I usually do.
I was talking with someone earlier who felt if you go to the lower tournament you have to dominate to make it worthwhile. But I disagreed.
In all honesty the NCAA Tourney is still more prestigious and a distinction in its own right. But I really think this nice run & good play in the NIT was a better preparation for next year than a one and done would have been in the NCAA Tournament. If we do this two or three years I will revoke that comment but at the moment I feel pretty good about it as Clemson fan.
Clemson supposedly has some shooters coming in next year. For Brownell's offense to really work you need guys who can shoot.
That tends to explain basketball to a tee. That's one reason why the Gamecocks have sucked here lately. They can't hit the broad side of a barn from ten feet out.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.