Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Space
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-05-2009, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,596,323 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

Are we alone in the universe or is there life out there waiting to be discovered?

NASA is getting ready to launch the Kepler telescope on an ambitious, first-of-its-kind mission: to search for Earth-size planets in our galaxy, orbiting stars at the right distances to have water on their surface.

ABC News: Are We Alone in This Universe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-05-2009, 07:11 PM
 
16,294 posts, read 28,531,593 times
Reputation: 8384
It takes a great deal of arrogance and denial to believe that we are alone in the universe. The utter immensity of it guarantees that there is a lot of life out there.

It also takes a great deal of arrogance to believe that we are an intelligent race, and would be peers to any that might discover our existence. I suspect they would view us much as a kid views ants on a sidewalk on a sunny day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2009, 09:27 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,068 posts, read 10,132,051 times
Reputation: 1651
Some have suggested computers could be made to be smarter (if you take that to mean an extension of human evolution...), but this argues otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2009, 07:06 PM
 
5,462 posts, read 9,636,292 times
Reputation: 3555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asheville Native View Post
It takes a great deal of arrogance and denial to believe that we are alone in the universe. The utter immensity of it guarantees that there is a lot of life out there.

It also takes a great deal of arrogance to believe that we are an intelligent race, and would be peers to any that might discover our existence. I suspect they would view us much as a kid views ants on a sidewalk on a sunny day.
If the aliens view us like ants, no doubt some rowdy alien may decide to start turning people into cinders using a magnifying glass aimed at the sun. LOL!

While there may indeed be life teeming throughtout the universe, even intelligent life, we have yet to find any real evidence that there is indeed life elsewhere. What we know is that there is life on our planet. But so far, there's no "guarantee" there's life anywhere else. However, that's all we know.

The question of life elsewhere in the universe is one reason why we're looking at Mars. It's still possible some kind of micro-organisms might live there, maybe beneath the surface.

Any suggestions that the vast size of the universe "guarantees" there's a lot of life in it, is based on speculation and theory - not on observed facts. Nothing wrong with that though because speculation and ideas are what help us imagine possibilities and make new discoveries. We are still at the very beginning of understanding the nature of the universe.

In my opinion, if there is intelligent life within our galaxy, I don't think there's too much to worry about in the way of visitations or alien invasions. The distance just to the nearest neighboring star is mind-boggling. Travel between galaxies is even more unlikely considering the distance to the nearest major galaxy is around 2 million light years away.

That's not to say there is no life elsewhere. It's just that we don't know if there's any life anywhere else. It'll be interesting to see what the Kepler telescope shows in the way of any Earth-sized planets in the so-called Goldilocks Zone of their host star. Seems to me it could take 3 or so years before discovering any such planets though. Even then, we won't really see much apart from it transiting in front of their star. From what I understand, Kepler is only a first step to discovering exoplanets that are smaller than the usual gas or rocky giants that have already been discovered.

Last edited by NightBazaar; 03-06-2009 at 08:12 PM.. Reason: Spelling correction
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2009, 07:45 PM
 
23,601 posts, read 70,412,676 times
Reputation: 49275
I use to think that intelligent life was fairly commonplace. Now, I think it is likely extremely rare.

The sun had to be the right class of star, in the right band of the galaxy, Jupiter or an analog had to exit within certain parameters, the Earth had to be roughly a particular size, it had to get hit hard to create a just-the-right-size moon that acted as a shield and stirrer, the core had to be magnetic to act as a shield, there had to be lots of water and carbon, life itself had to develop, and then there had to be catastrophes large enough to have three mass extinctions without totally killing off all life, and then there had to be a subtle genetic shift to twist the brain into a more developed form.

All totaled, if one star out of 1,000,000,000,000 had the possibility of a planet with intelligent life, then we would have to consider how long intelligent life capable of communicating on an extra-planetary system scale would exist. Intelligence is not an automatic answer to problems of diseases and natural disasters, especially if those disasters are on any large scale. Whales could be commonplace compared to smart humanoids, but whales have no need or ability to communicate on an extra-planetary system scale. Although we might not be alone in the universe, I suspect we are close enough to it, given the huge distances involved, that we might as well figure that we are.

The real issue is that there are very few pockets in the universe where radiation is minimal enough, elements are plentiful enough and in the correct proportions, and temperatures are in the correct range all for a long enough period of time to allow life, and later intelligent life, to form.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2009, 08:57 PM
 
16,294 posts, read 28,531,593 times
Reputation: 8384
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry chickpea View Post

All totaled, if one star out of 1,000,000,000,000 had the possibility of a planet with intelligent life, then we would have to consider how long intelligent life capable of communicating on an extra-planetary system scale would exist.
Thus assuming carbon based life, and we have found life on our own planet that lives it an environment that is very toxic to most life on the planet.

But OK, if 1 in 10^12 stars might have a planet computable with carbon based life forms, and there are an estimated 10^24 stars in the universe. Thus there is the possibility of 10^12 planets (or 1,000,000,000,000) that could support life as we view it as oxygen breathing carbon based life.

And what about sulfur based life, or silicon, or methane, or ammonia , and anything that might allow life to develop.

But there will always be those that deny anything they can't see, or even what they can see when it is in conflict with religious doctrine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2009, 08:19 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,068 posts, read 10,132,051 times
Reputation: 1651
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry chickpea View Post
The real issue is that there are very few pockets in the universe where radiation is minimal enough, elements are plentiful enough and in the correct proportions, and temperatures are in the correct range all for a long enough period of time to allow life, and later intelligent life, to form.
Yeah, and even then, in order to be advanced technologically, an intelligent species likely be hamstrung by the lack of useful elements that would help him build tools to explore and to better enhance their lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2009, 10:40 AM
 
23,601 posts, read 70,412,676 times
Reputation: 49275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asheville Native View Post
Thus assuming carbon based life, and we have found life on our own planet that lives it an environment that is very toxic to most life on the planet.

But OK, if 1 in 10^12 stars might have a planet computable with carbon based life forms, and there are an estimated 10^24 stars in the universe. Thus there is the possibility of 10^12 planets (or 1,000,000,000,000) that could support life as we view it as oxygen breathing carbon based life.

And what about sulfur based life, or silicon, or methane, or ammonia , and anything that might allow life to develop.

But there will always be those that deny anything they can't see, or even what they can see when it is in conflict with religious doctrine.
Brian, you seem to be on a crusade, rather than thinking it through. Methane is CH4 (CARBON and hydrogen). Ammonia is likewise not an element and is too highly highly reactive anyway. Silicone just doesn't have the energy depth required unless very pure and doped with rare earth elements. If you are trying to consider other life forms, you would be better off considering the old Fred Hoyle macguffin of an intelligent interstellar cloud of dust. The physics of that are at least unknown enough to make it plausible.

My point is not religious, I think the likelihood of life elsewhere is somewhat possible. My point is that after factoring all of the fine tuning that is needed to force the growth of a lifeform that can attempt to communicate on an interstellar basis, "intelligent" life is extremely rare, to the point that we can just about rule out ever contacting one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2009, 12:16 PM
 
5,462 posts, read 9,636,292 times
Reputation: 3555
The Kepler Telescope was launched today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2009, 10:23 PM
 
1,107 posts, read 3,021,950 times
Reputation: 479
I remember reading that scientist found 3 earthlike planets in another galaxy, but with the technology we have today and the distance to that galaxy would take more than a life time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Space

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top