Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Florida > Tampa Bay
 [Register]
Tampa Bay Tampa - St. Petersburg - Clearwater
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-27-2024, 05:18 PM
 
Location: Sarasota/ Bradenton - University Pkwy area
4,639 posts, read 7,598,937 times
Reputation: 6078

Advertisements

I've been here in FL (Sarasota area) for 40 years now, have gone thru a number of major tropical storms and a few hurricanes with little or no damage.

My in-laws bought a winter home in FL back in 1968 and although they are gone now, the home they owned for decades is still standing in spite of all the storms.

I've both rented and owned over the years. My reasons for buying vs renting?

We were tired of dealing with landlords, leases, deposits & having a landlord tell us what we can and cannot do with our home, including adopting a couple of pets.

We wanted the security of having a homesteaded property, one that by FL law is protected in bankruptcy from creditors. A judgment creditor cannot force the sale of a FL debtor’s homestead to satisfy a money judgment. A recorded judgment does not attach to or become a lien on a FL debtor’s homestead property.

We wanted the security of putting down roots, living in the same neighborhood for years and years, knowing our neighbors, knowing that if we moved it was our decision and not because a landlord gave notice.

A number of posters on this thread have made good arguments for both renting and buying. There's no one right or wrong answer. It comes down to the financial and emotional needs of the individual.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-27-2024, 06:27 PM
 
6,143 posts, read 3,850,425 times
Reputation: 17365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunshine Rules View Post
I've been here in FL (Sarasota area) for 40 years now, have gone thru a number of major tropical storms and a few hurricanes with little or no damage.

My in-laws bought a winter home in FL back in 1968 and although they are gone now, the home they owned for decades is still standing in spite of all the storms.

I've both rented and owned over the years. My reasons for buying vs renting?

We were tired of dealing with landlords, leases, deposits & having a landlord tell us what we can and cannot do with our home, including adopting a couple of pets.

We wanted the security of having a homesteaded property, one that by FL law is protected in bankruptcy from creditors. A judgment creditor cannot force the sale of a FL debtor’s homestead to satisfy a money judgment. A recorded judgment does not attach to or become a lien on a FL debtor’s homestead property.

We wanted the security of putting down roots, living in the same neighborhood for years and years, knowing our neighbors, knowing that if we moved it was our decision and not because a landlord gave notice.

A number of posters on this thread have made good arguments for both renting and buying. There's no one right or wrong answer. It comes down to the financial and emotional needs of the individual.
Good post.

As a friend of mine said long ago, "If you own a home and decide that you want to dig a hole in the yard, all you need is a shovel."

Of course, today, I might have to modify that saying just a bit by adding "You may also need a permit from your municipality and/or your HOA before digging the hole."

.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2024, 08:21 AM
 
Location: CENTRAL FLORIDA
238 posts, read 212,211 times
Reputation: 518
So true. Been in Florida for 32 years .Bought a house that needed work (fixed it up nicely over the years)so we could have a yard for the kids and pets. We are retired now and when we look at townhouses,patio homes etc in some 55 and over communities so we can do less house repairs etc and read about HOA'S (which we never experienced) we are not sure we could confirm. Our kids told us we would not. LOL We still have pets and sharing a common wall would be a concern. We grew up being told that getting a house was first before vacations,new cars etc. So we bought a starter home in Chicago suburbs in the late seventies.Our kids played on front yards with other kids. Or in the back yards where they didnt need constant supervision. Our dogs were not walked on leashes, They ran in the back yards. We didnt have to like all our neighbors but everyone still got along. I feel sorry for young families in todays world that may not be high wage earners and can not afford a starter home. Prices are so out of reach. We will really miss our neighborhood if we move but sometimes its time for a new adventure or a need to downsize.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2024, 09:05 AM
 
Location: SoFlo
670 posts, read 431,212 times
Reputation: 1360
I disagreed with your entire post until I read to the bolded portion. After reading it, I totally agree with you that most of real estate value is tied to the desirability of its location and SoCal and SoFlo are highly desirable. Personally, my primary, new construction home in Palm Beach County nearly tripled (based on appraisal) in value at its peak in mid 2023.

But to play devil's advocate, I still consider owning (in most cases) to be better than renting and the pros generally outweigh the cons.

Below are some quick bullet points:

1). The argument that homes aren't an investment and that's its an expense seems silly considering that we all have to pay for a place to live. At least with owning, the principal payments eventually end, and I build equity - What does a renter get besides paying off a landlord's mortgage, taxes, and insurance while said landlord profits?

2). House ownership is incentivized with deductible interest and an exemption on capital gains up to a certain amount when sold.

3). Property that could be left to offspring (generational money).

4). That property could be leveraged to buy other investments.

5). That property would reduce your tax burden.

6). People who own property are more likely to survive economic uncertainty because they have equity in their property. You lose your job but have $200k in your house, you can refi or do a HELOC and you'll be in a better position than a renter.

7). Mortgages generally qualify to get some type of deferment during economic hardship - Renters do not...miss a month's rent and you'll be living under a bridge the following month.

Not directed towards you per say, but whenever someone tells me renting is better than owning outside of extreme examples, I quickly become suspicious of said person's intentions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtcbnd03 View Post
In 99% of America renting is ALWAYS better than buying. A primary residence is not an investment...it's an expense. Closing costs, maintenance, renovation, taxes, insurance, etc...you're shelling out money each and every month. If you buy the SP500 you roughly double your money every 10 years without lifting a finger or spending another dime. With a house you MIGHT double your money but after adjusting for all the time/costs that home owners conveniently leave out you don't. 5x leverage and a 3% mortgage rate would definitely change that equation cause that's basically free money....but not at 7% rates today.

Now the exceptions to this rule are Southern California...and I believe soon South Florida. These are the only two places in America where you can get year round nice weather, sun, beach, ocean so demand will easily outpace supply and inflation. Location. Location. Location. There's a reason why a homes in LA / San Diego sells for millions....and why ones in Tampa and Miami will soon follow (if they haven't already). But hurricanes and insurance situation sure have me nervous here in SOFL.

I own several investment properties but still rent. The ONLY reason I would buy a primary home is for an investment in my family...and not for financial investment reasons.

Last edited by silverct9a; 04-30-2024 at 09:53 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2024, 08:30 PM
 
1,072 posts, read 927,964 times
Reputation: 1875
Even Warren Buffett says buying a house is a lousy financial investment...

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/warre...184515477.html

My favorite example from Buffett of how lousy non-income producing assets are as financial investments is the Mona Lisa. Now just stop and think if your house is going to appreciate more in value than the Mona Lisa...

https://markets.businessinsider.com/...demnity-2021-9
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2024, 03:25 AM
 
Location: Florida
14,980 posts, read 9,895,330 times
Reputation: 12094
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtcbnd03 View Post
Even Warren Buffett says buying a house is a lousy financial investment...

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/warre...184515477.html

My favorite example from Buffett of how lousy non-income producing assets are as financial investments is the Mona Lisa. Now just stop and think if your house is going to appreciate more in value than the Mona Lisa...

https://markets.businessinsider.com/...demnity-2021-9
Not every investment falls into income producing. The fact that you and I are alive and breathing alludes to that fact... right? My parents invested in me, their time, energy, love and great expense on their part. I'm glad they did.

I contend a home is different from a house. To me... it's not semantics and my 'best' investment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2024, 06:08 AM
 
6,143 posts, read 3,850,425 times
Reputation: 17365
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtcbnd03 View Post
Even Warren Buffett says buying a house is a lousy financial investment...

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/warre...184515477.html

My favorite example from Buffett of how lousy non-income producing assets are as financial investments is the Mona Lisa. Now just stop and think if your house is going to appreciate more in value than the Mona Lisa...

https://markets.businessinsider.com/...demnity-2021-9
It's odd that you would use Warren Buffet as an example for NOT owning the house that you live in since he has owned and lived in the same house in Omaha for about 60 years. Wonder why he's not renting if he truly believes that?

https://homeimprovementgeek.com/warren-buffett-house/


.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2024, 06:15 AM
 
1,072 posts, read 927,964 times
Reputation: 1875
I was clear to state "financial" investment in my posts. I agree homes are great emotional and family investments but not financial ones.

And Warren Buffett only bought a house because his wife wanted him to which he mentions in the article. He delayed his house purchase as long as possible so he could use that same down payment money to buy stocks which earned him a much greater financial return.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2024, 07:22 AM
 
6,143 posts, read 3,850,425 times
Reputation: 17365
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtcbnd03 View Post
I was clear to state "financial" investment in my posts. I agree homes are great emotional and family investments but not financial ones.

And Warren Buffett only bought a house because his wife wanted him to which he mentions in the article. He delayed his house purchase as long as possible so he could use that same down payment money to buy stocks which earned him a much greater financial return.
I would have to see some real numbers in order to be convinced of what you are saying. Also, it could depend on the specific area since NOT ALL areas appreciate at the same rate. Some even depreciate for a decade or several.

So, I'm not saying that you're wrong. It's just that I'm not convinced that you're right either since any particular area/location/price/assumptions would have a heavy influence on the outcome of the calculations.

.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2024, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Florida
14,980 posts, read 9,895,330 times
Reputation: 12094
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtcbnd03 View Post
I was clear to state "financial" investment in my posts. I agree homes are great emotional and family investments but not financial ones.

And Warren Buffett only bought a house because his wife wanted him to which he mentions in the article. He delayed his house purchase as long as possible so he could use that same down payment money to buy stocks which earned him a much greater financial return.
Do you believe this is universally true? or just a one off example of how people can use their personal wealth and energy and how it should be invested?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Florida > Tampa Bay

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top