Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-04-2010, 08:09 AM
 
Location: Holly Neighborhood, Austin, Texas
3,981 posts, read 6,733,814 times
Reputation: 2882

Advertisements

So I was walking my dog Saturday when two dogs came up to my dog on the sidewalk. They got in my dog's face and were aggressive and as I was walking away one of them got me on the back of my leg. Austin Animal Control guy came out and took a statement from me after which we went to the scene of the incident. There I could see one of the dogs in the backyard behind a chain link fence. Luckily the AC guy got verification of updated rabies vaccinations from one of the residents there. I did go to the ER and had to get an antibiotic for a total of $110 out of pocket (at this point at least as my insurance could always come back to me asking for more).

I heard that Texas has a one bite rule where if the owner is not aware the dog is aggressive (of course he could pretend to be ignorant too) is not liable for the first bite.
Is this true? Do I have any recourse? The money isn't too big a deal but I want to hammer home the idea that letting your dogs free to roam (I doubt they escaped) is not acceptable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-04-2010, 08:31 AM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,839,259 times
Reputation: 25341
don't know how accurate this info is but my next door neighbor (over 70 but in great shape) was walking his dog --small Yorkie under 2 lbs--on street in our neighborhood about 5 houses down from his when two bulldogs managed to get out of their yard/or just away from their owners and attack his dog---really without any heads up like surrounding and barking first--they just jumped the little dog on his leash--
my neighbor had to protect his dog by covering it with his body--not the wisest move obviously--and they attacked him--
the owners had hard time getting the dogs off

our neighbor had to have stitches--his dog was hurt but survived the attack

we were told later --when he sued them--that they had moved to our neighborhood because of complaints about the dogs at their old neighborhood
they would walk those dogs late at night when no one was on the street and are still living in our neighborhood as far as I know

our neighbor did not talk about the law suit but apparently got a settlement

your homeowners' insurance is supposed to give some type of coverage if your pet bites someone--not sure how much base coverage or if it can be cancelled based on breed of dog or previous claims

what did the animal control officer say--they are usually well versed in what the law is regarding animal bites and owners' liability

ALL dogs are supposed to be on leash if they are out of their yard--I think that is rule in any incorporated town--
IF your neighbors have past history of having dogs get out of yard and run unsupervised in neighborhood that is probably a fine-able offense as well...

we have another homeowner in my old neighborhood with a great dane that can jump the backyard fence -- he has done it in past--and attacked another dog that was loose in neighborhood from neighborhood next to ours--older irish setter that was non-aggressive and frankly in pretty poor physical shape from age--
it took a neighbor with a golf club to get the great dane to let go of that irish setter--

my husband walks most mornings and he at first would carry a short chain dog leash with him but after those two incidents decided that was not enough protection and started taking his nine iron...carries it in the new neighborhood as well although frankly there are not as many loose dogs here
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2010, 09:47 AM
 
Location: A little suburb of Houston
3,702 posts, read 18,209,779 times
Reputation: 2092
Read the Texas Health and Safety Code Title 10 Chapter 822 regarding rules for dangerous dogs and declaring dangerous dogs, etc. http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Index.aspx

There is no such thing as the one bite rule, that is an urban myth. The owner is completely libel for any actions or damages by his pet and can be sued. His home owner's insurance may cover it, but more and more are specifically excluding dog bite coverage. Make sure that the animal control authority in your area declares the dog a dangerous dog as they may not do this. If the dog is declared Dangerous then the homeowner will have to purchase special insurance coverage and comply with more specific laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2010, 05:30 PM
 
316 posts, read 849,299 times
Reputation: 258
It seems that Texas does have something akin to a "one bite rule":

http://recenter.tamu.edu/pdf/1683.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2010, 06:24 PM
 
Location: A little suburb of Houston
3,702 posts, read 18,209,779 times
Reputation: 2092
Quote:
Originally Posted by AusParent View Post
It seems that Texas does have something akin to a "one bite rule":

http://recenter.tamu.edu/pdf/1683.pdf
This document predates the new laws that written and went into effect in 2007. However, even under this document, negligence would come into play in the OPs case as the dogs were not properly confined.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2010, 09:13 AM
 
Location: Hutto, Tx
9,249 posts, read 26,687,302 times
Reputation: 2851
My border collie was in the front yard with us once, unleashed, and a neighborhood teenager walked by and for some reason he nipped at her and it broke the skin. A border collie isn't one breed usually characterized as vicious or aggressive (he was a puppy at the time and I found out later that they have a very strong herding instinct then and have a tendency to chase people to "herd" them; it has to be trained OUT of them). I guess this is what he tried to do, and her trying to run away from him when he walked up to her didn't help matters any Even the AC person was surprised to get a call about a Collie. She said from the description the complainant gave she thought she would be dealing with a rabid Rottie or something. Thankfully, she was aware of their "herding" mentality.

Anyway, since it was his first offense the animal control officer who was called came to the house and asked to see his rabies shot record (which we had), but because he bit someone and it broke the skin, he had to be quarantined at a place of our choosing for abt. 5-10 days. After that time, he was allowed home. The only thing the AC Officer told us later is that he needed to be on leash in the front yard. Second offense is more severe. You have to give them up for Euthenasia (sp!)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2010, 09:41 AM
 
316 posts, read 849,299 times
Reputation: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poltracker View Post
This document predates the new laws that written and went into effect in 2007. However, even under this document, negligence would come into play in the OPs case as the dogs were not properly confined.
I'm not trying to argue with you but trying to understand (current) law. Reading the statute, it appears that the owner does have to know that the animal is dangerous for liability to be established (assuming that other liability like negligence cannot be established):

HEALTH AND SAFETY CODEÂ*Â* CHAPTER 822. REGULATION OF ANIMALS
822.005 (a)(2)

For example, if your dog bit someone 1) in public, 2) on leash, 3) without your goading, and 4) with no previous history or inclination, how would you be liable under this statute?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2010, 10:37 AM
 
332 posts, read 1,386,478 times
Reputation: 337
Quote:
Originally Posted by AusParent View Post
I'm not trying to argue with you but trying to understand (current) law. Reading the statute, it appears that the owner does have to know that the animal is dangerous for liability to be established (assuming that other liability like negligence cannot be established):

HEALTH AND SAFETY CODEÂ*Â* CHAPTER 822. REGULATION OF ANIMALS
822.005 (a)(2)

For example, if your dog bit someone 1) in public, 2) on leash, 3) without your goading, and 4) with no previous history or inclination, how would you be liable under this statute?

You wouldn't be liable under this statute, however that doesn't mean that you aren't liable for tort damages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2010, 11:04 AM
 
2,312 posts, read 3,664,074 times
Reputation: 1606
How do we know your dog didnt say something to the other dogs? Sometimes these "My master is better then your master'' arguments lead to a tussle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Holly Neighborhood, Austin, Texas
3,981 posts, read 6,733,814 times
Reputation: 2882
Quote:
Originally Posted by badhornet View Post
How do we know your dog didnt say something to the other dogs? Sometimes these "My master is better then your master'' arguments lead to a tussle.
I wouldn't think it mattered since it was on a public sidewalk. Anyway they approached me and my dog growling initially. Also there master wasn't there as they were "patrolling" the front yard.

I think if my insurance doesn't cover this (never assume) I'll have to do something. $100 I can forget but any more than that I would personally consider an issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top