Quote:
Originally Posted by cocaseco
Almost forgot this...Actually on many, smaller but still large cities (Portland, Denver, Seattle, San Diego and Las vegas to name a few) You can easily find 1 to 5 acre lots in the metro area. You may want to look outside your block before making a global comparison.
|
You might wish to do the same as I've lived all over the planet at various times of my life and comparing apples to oranges has never been my strong suit but you carry on if you must.
You still ignored the comparison you're making with cities that in no way mimic Toronto for either size, age or climate location.
No I'm not sensitive but at least consider the question you've asked. It easily parallels suggesting that New York has acreages with frame houses available for sale within the city core and you know this is just not so OR at least won't be advertised on your typical real estate sites if they are.
I did not state that brick was cheaper NOW but PERHAPS was back in the day when frame houses were by the nature of their design colder and poorly built SO brick was the sought after superior method of building to last in those days. You must also consider that living in a frost zone with ground penetration of 4 feet or so that frame houses back then were built on grade while brick were foundation supported with footing below that frost line to prevent heaving from cracking the walls ergo; better built and longevity.
If you must build with foundations to establish frost indemnity then you would "usually" go all the way and build it to last with brick or stone fascia. Only more recently, as in last 40 years or so, have "R" factors and technology advanced to allow the sealing of frame houses along with air exchangers and newer insulation methods with 2 X 6 framing to allow for thicker windows of double or triple pane to achieve the inner warmth to make heating these types of places economical.
Those very early frame houses would have outlived their useful lifespan many decades ago and since been replaced with brick or at least brick fascia houses to fit in to the surrounding architecture.
Lot sizes are what they are as any larger lots would have been severed to provide their owners with a cash cow in the form of an addtional lot or lots to sell off so that they could afford to upscale to a better house in the suburbs with no discernable mortage remaining.
All of these things are identical to ANY American city incorporated in a similar time frame as Toronto.
Vegas; a city carved out of the desert, most, if not all, built on slab, on grade didn't even exist as a city until it incorporated the surrounding areas in 1911.
History (Official City of Las Vegas Web Site)
Seattle on the west coast where a more temperate climate exists along with a preponderance of lumber without the "cold soak" days of your typical Toronto winter? Seriously?
Surely you must see comparing thusly is the very accusation you've made of me not getting "outside of my block".