Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Toyota, Lexus, and Scion
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-16-2013, 04:11 AM
 
Location: Indiana
316 posts, read 660,426 times
Reputation: 129

Advertisements

Always been a Toyota truck owner and will be in the market for a new truck in 2yrs but with the gas prices staying at where they are I'm thinking about just getting a RAV4 FWD instead. The gas mileage is way better and I should be able to still carry quite a bit since the RAV4's back seats fold down.

Anyone own one and can give feedback on what you can carry and can't? Would you be able to carry a twin/double 54x75 mattress in the back of one?

I wouldn't need to carry items for a business or hobby, just like the extra space when I do need to carry or move.

Just seems the practicability of trucks are not worth it anymore with the current gas prices...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-16-2013, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,717 posts, read 18,909,338 times
Reputation: 11225
I don't have one but 3 friends have them. They love them and one lady is on her third. You won't fit that mattress in one. It'd be a close fit though. All of them are getting over 30 mpgs hiway. One of the guys who never takes care of his cars, has over 180,000 miles on his 3 year old RAV. The car has maybe seen as many 4 oil changes and it runs great.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 11:14 PM
 
Location: Indiana
316 posts, read 660,426 times
Reputation: 129
Thanks for the feedback, They do indeed get great gas mileage and if you get the FWD instead of the AWD your mileage goes up 2mpg as well.
No mattress that size? What would be the biggest item you could carry in the back of the RAV4 to give me a good comparison on what I could carry with them? I would just go look at one at a dealer but right now I'm stuck overseas and can't look at one till I get back home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 11:21 PM
 
2,349 posts, read 5,433,402 times
Reputation: 3062
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranosb View Post
Always been a Toyota truck owner and will be in the market for a new truck in 2yrs but with the gas prices staying at where they are I'm thinking about just getting a RAV4 FWD instead. The gas mileage is way better and I should be able to still carry quite a bit since the RAV4's back seats fold down.

Anyone own one and can give feedback on what you can carry and can't? Would you be able to carry a twin/double 54x75 mattress in the back of one?

I wouldn't need to carry items for a business or hobby, just like the extra space when I do need to carry or move.

Just seems the practicability of trucks are not worth it anymore with the current gas prices...
I find it hard to believe you can't get basic dimensions of that vehicle off an one of a gillion websites.

Newer mid sized trucks are speculated to approach 25-30 mpg with newer engines, direct fuel injection, lighter weights, more aerodynamics and 8 speed transmissions.

2015 Toyota Tacoma Fuel Economy Estimates - 32 MPG : TacomaHQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 12:35 AM
 
1,738 posts, read 3,006,336 times
Reputation: 2230
You'd have to be a fool to think a mid size truck can get 30+mpg.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 01:13 AM
 
Location: Indiana
316 posts, read 660,426 times
Reputation: 129
Best info is from real RAV4 owners, not Toyota's or a dealer's website for practice cargo use.

The best mpg you can get on a Tacoma Auto now is 19/24 and that's a 2wd 4cyl. 32mpg in just 2yrs time on a non hybrid, never happen, even the RAV4 at best gets 31 hwy and that is FWD only.
Thanks for the link, It's entertaining, but a pipe dream at best by 2015.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 08:08 AM
 
1,738 posts, read 3,006,336 times
Reputation: 2230
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranosb View Post
Best info is from real RAV4 owners, not Toyota's or a dealer's website for practice cargo use.

The best mpg you can get on a Tacoma Auto now is 19/24 and that's a 2wd 4cyl. 32mpg in just 2yrs time on a non hybrid, never happen, even the RAV4 at best gets 31 hwy and that is FWD only.
Thanks for the link, It's entertaining, but a pipe dream at best by 2015.
It's like when I see the advertising for Ford's F-150 ecoboost 4x4 getting 23MPG highway. There's just no way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 08:25 AM
 
Location: Poway, CA
2,698 posts, read 12,167,740 times
Reputation: 2251
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyramidsurf View Post
It's like when I see the advertising for Ford's F-150 ecoboost 4x4 getting 23MPG highway. There's just no way.
My Ford Flex Ecoboost AWD pulls 23 on long trips no problem. Not apples to apples, but still. It's getting exactly what Ford advertises for it.

Is this thread about Tacomas or RAV4s? Confused.

Mike
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,537,374 times
Reputation: 18814
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteboyslo View Post
My Ford Flex Ecoboost AWD pulls 23 on long trips no problem. Not apples to apples, but still. It's getting exactly what Ford advertises for it.

Is this thread about Tacomas or RAV4s? Confused.

Mike
He has a Taco but is thinking about getting a rav4 to replace it. Although the rav has decent carrying capacity. You will not get a full size mattress in it. A twin would be questionable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Here
2,754 posts, read 7,419,652 times
Reputation: 2872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyramidsurf View Post
You'd have to be a fool to think a mid size truck can get 30+mpg.
You're definitely a fool for thinking against the progressive nature of manufacturers to get better MPG out of their whole fleet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Toyota, Lexus, and Scion
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top