Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which density level would you consider ideal for average city living?
Extremely high density. Above 10, 000 people per square mile 57 37.75%
Medium Density. 3000 ppsm to 10 000 ppsm 64 42.38%
Low Density. 500 ppsm to 3000 ppsm 12 7.95%
no density. below 500 ppsm 18 11.92%
Voters: 151. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-12-2010, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 33,036,965 times
Reputation: 7752

Advertisements

People always argue that city A isn't as good as City B because City A is not dense, but haven't people been running away from excessively dense cities?

Over the last 50 years, haven't the denser cities rate of growth been slowing down while the cities which offer more space have been steadily increasing?

I think more people find having a house with a yard for the kids and dogs to run around in more attractive than being packed in like sardines in a townhome or high rise complex.

I know density may be ideal for the younger more fast paced individuals, but some people act like that is everyone's ideal.

what do y'all think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-12-2010, 10:24 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 39,048,062 times
Reputation: 7976
I believe the perfect is subjective and different to all - really depends on what people are looking for
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2010, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,106,767 times
Reputation: 4047
Subjective. Either way works, depends on who you ask.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2010, 10:29 AM
 
1,250 posts, read 2,525,167 times
Reputation: 283
In terms of ideal I don't think there really is one. Actually the differences might be the best since it allows everyone to have what they are looking for. Depending on your lifestyle different densities are better or worse.

I also am thinking couldn't places of similar density have vastly different levels of quality depending on how they are arranged? I am refferring to factors outside of things related to people but in terms of design issues. I can see some places of similar density could be either designed well or designed poorly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2010, 10:33 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 33,036,965 times
Reputation: 7752
I believe it is subjective too, that is why I think it is stupid when people say Houston is not a real city because it is not NY or Chicago in terms of density
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2010, 10:42 AM
 
8,289 posts, read 13,595,496 times
Reputation: 5019
Having lived in the NYC metro area & Miami densities above 10,000 ppsq/m just seems normal to me. I think I would go bonkers living in a boring suburb or in a rural area!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2010, 10:42 AM
 
1,250 posts, read 2,525,167 times
Reputation: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
I believe it is subjective too, that is why I think it is stupid when people say Houston is not a real city because it is not NY or Chicago in terms of density
My guess is that it has to do with when it was built which determines how dense it is. You have to build out enough in order to build up, it is just in the past building up was sooner due to transportation reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2010, 10:45 AM
 
2,106 posts, read 6,645,056 times
Reputation: 963
10,000 ppsm isn't really medium when compared to 3,000. I think 3,000 is far too low, but 7-10,000 to be ideal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2010, 10:45 AM
 
468 posts, read 792,072 times
Reputation: 98
Theres not a difference.. either or offers good living you ask me.. Its just about preference...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2010, 10:46 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 39,048,062 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by imperialmog View Post
My guess is that it has to do with when it was built which determines how dense it is. You have to build out enough in order to build up, it is just in the past building up was sooner due to transportation reasons.

probably actually had more to do with automobiles
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top