Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-26-2020, 10:12 AM
 
9,952 posts, read 6,676,224 times
Reputation: 19661

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
Not just that-but NYC and the surrounding area (including LI and northern NJ) has more than 10 times as many CV-19 cases as the next highest entire state! Including entire states with populations significantly larger than NY.
The other larger states don’t have the testing capacity of NYC, so that isn’t an accurate statement. We know that NYC has a lot of cases, but in places like FL, they simply don’t have access to the test. I have one friend who said most of the people in his immediate family got sick and he tried to get a test for his daughter who was the sickest after her test came back negative for strep (I guess they had flu shots), but they were told it was not available and to self quarantine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-26-2020, 03:21 PM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,814 posts, read 4,011,395 times
Reputation: 3284
Default Has Covid 19 Exposed the bad of urbanity?

Dense urban spaces, public transit, the filthy unwashed masses. Super spreaders who cause hundreds to get infected, simply by taking an uber from the subway to the store?

Will newer, suburban, auto-centric cities weather this Chinese plaque better? Will there be enough land to bury the dead in NYC, SF, Boston, and Chicago? The End is near, and I fear no one will be spared from loss in some way. God be with you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2020, 03:24 PM
 
8,865 posts, read 6,869,333 times
Reputation: 8679
Not really. As bad as COVID-19 is (and will be), it's NOTHING like the benefits of a walkable lifestyle, less environmental destruction (even just the human effects), etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2020, 03:26 PM
 
2,262 posts, read 2,400,335 times
Reputation: 2741
Lol. no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2020, 03:31 PM
 
Location: Miami (prev. NY, Atlanta, SF, OC and San Diego)
7,410 posts, read 6,553,115 times
Reputation: 6685
no, it has exposed the ills of austerity and the importance of a public safety net .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2020, 03:37 PM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,841,718 times
Reputation: 3101
Covid-19 has exposed the United States dependence on Chinese drugs and the need for us to take back our ability to make pharmaceuticals and medical device in America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2020, 03:47 PM
sub
 
Location: ^##
4,963 posts, read 3,758,571 times
Reputation: 7831
Quote:
Originally Posted by elchevere View Post
no, it has exposed the ills of austerity and the importance of a public safety net .
No public safety net would stop what's currently going on.
My answer is yes, it certainly exposes obvious problems of urbanity. I'm not totally down on urbanity, just being honest and realistic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2020, 03:54 PM
 
Location: plano
7,891 posts, read 11,410,931 times
Reputation: 7799
Fatalities attributed to the virus suggest NYC is the epi center. No test needed though they do help and produce differences if one is looking at number of cases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2020, 04:01 PM
 
492 posts, read 535,846 times
Reputation: 769
For me it absolutely did. Look at the epicenters of the outbreak - NYC and SFO. Both densely populated places with a lot of public transit usage..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2020, 04:05 PM
 
99 posts, read 117,013 times
Reputation: 178
Hell yeah, at least now people will realize that living on top of each other isn't really a great idea when it comes to public health..

With respect to owning a car and not using public transportation, with the predictions that people will gravitate towards electric cars in the next 20 years, the carbon footprint is greatly reduced too.. There is nothing wrong with owning a house with a yard and having a car and being able to drive to any place you want..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top