Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > District of Columbia > Washington, DC
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-31-2013, 05:35 AM
 
792 posts, read 2,874,250 times
Reputation: 882

Advertisements

There's another thread here about how high Metro's fares are, but I want to ask another question: How does it make any sense, in terms of the region's transportation workability, for Metro to charge more at peak times?

Typically, peak surcharges are used to discourage use, for example, congestion pricing is used to discourage driving during peak hours in London..

DC roads are parking lots during rush hour, but it takes the opposite approach. Most roadways are free, but subway rates for peak hours (and unlimited-ride cards typically used by commuters) are jacked way up. Is there any transportation justification for this, or is it just dysfunctional?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-31-2013, 07:14 AM
 
3,550 posts, read 6,490,393 times
Reputation: 3506
it's only fitting since metro is so efficient and reliable and metro employees are so hard working and care so much about the passengers
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 08:48 AM
 
Location: Alexandria, VA
15,144 posts, read 27,785,743 times
Reputation: 27270
It's certainly not fair on the Blue Line
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 10:33 AM
 
Location: USA
8,011 posts, read 11,404,247 times
Reputation: 3454
it's dumb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Rockville, MD
36 posts, read 115,110 times
Reputation: 38
I think they are banking on the fact that some people (like me ) have no choice but to take Metro during peak hours; so they capitalize on that. The ICC is like that too. The toll is more during peak hours even though people have a free (270/495/95) alternative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 01:26 PM
 
1,624 posts, read 4,869,438 times
Reputation: 1308
There is some justisification for the surcharges because the metro system runs more trains with more cars during peak periods when the surcharges are charged. If they chose to have the same number of trains and cars as off peak hours, commuters might have to wait for several trains or more just to get on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 02:45 PM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
If Metro is at or above capacity during rush hour, it's the proper approach. It will tend to push ridership to the shoulder hours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 05:56 PM
 
792 posts, read 2,874,250 times
Reputation: 882
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
If Metro is at or above capacity during rush hour, it's the proper approach. It will tend to push ridership to the shoulder hours.
This is a better way a phrasing my question, thanks. Is Metro at capacity? A little googling and we have an answer:

"It is projected that in 2020 ridership growth will have surpassed the point for any additional capability of the system to carry the peak passenger loads required to maintain market share on the Orange Line and soon after on the remaining lines."

I die a little each time I read such terrible writing, but the bottom line is, BrickCharm City called it. We are being milked (and possibly conditioned) with higher fares at rush hour to fill Metro's coffers.

http://www.wmata.com/pdfs/planning/C...ty_ExecSum.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 06:01 PM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Metro's coffers are not full enough to maintain system reliability. You want it cheap or do you want it to work?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 04:51 AM
 
792 posts, read 2,874,250 times
Reputation: 882
If full capacity will be reached by 2020 - essentially, tomorrow - I don't have a complaint about fares. That's scary as far as DC's transportation future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > District of Columbia > Washington, DC
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top