Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-24-2015, 06:02 AM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,502 posts, read 75,252,292 times
Reputation: 16619

Advertisements

Fahrenheit.

Most of us only care about air temperature, not water temperature. When was the last time you used a thermometer to measure water temperature?

"Fahrenheit is also more precise. The ambient temperature on most of the inhabited world ranges from -20 degrees Fahrenheit to 110 degrees Fahrenheit—a 130-degree range. On the Celsius scale, that range is from -28.8 degrees to 43.3 degrees—a 72.1-degree range. This means that you can get a more exact measurement of the air temperature using Fahrenheit because it uses almost twice the scale."

Other similar Threads.

Celsius vs Fahrenheit

F vs. C
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-24-2015, 06:05 AM
B87
 
Location: Surrey/London
11,769 posts, read 10,591,349 times
Reputation: 3099
Our daytime temperatures in an average year range from 0c to 32c. 32f to 90f just sounds weird.

Including lows, it doesn't go below -5c in a normal year, which is a random 25f.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2015, 06:07 AM
 
Location: Leeds, UK
22,112 posts, read 29,573,026 times
Reputation: 8819
"This means that you can get a more exact measurement of the air temperature using Fahrenheit because it uses almost twice the scale."

Why is that important? Does anyone need to know if the temperature moved from 74.4F to 74.5F? It's basically the same thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2015, 06:25 AM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,797,010 times
Reputation: 6550
I have to go with C even though F is what I know best (US). C works better in formulas; physics and chemistry are generally metric and C based. Yes, you can convert them to F instead. The granularity argument is pretty baseless. You want more precision? Add another place to the right of the decimal. As others pointed out, for casual weather observations it is not a big deal. When used in weather it is rarely truly accurate anyway; move the thermometer location a stone's throw away and you will likely start getting slightly different readings.

Last edited by ReachTheBeach; 06-24-2015 at 06:54 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2015, 07:54 AM
 
Location: San Antonio
923 posts, read 1,502,073 times
Reputation: 812
Quote:
Originally Posted by GR1138769 View Post
Just curious do imperial countries use Rankine in science classes?
The only time I ever saw Rankine was when I took Thermodynamics in college.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2015, 08:37 AM
 
Location: near Turin (Italy)
1,373 posts, read 1,442,334 times
Reputation: 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReachTheBeach View Post
I have to go with C even though F is what I know best (US). C works better in formulas; physics and chemistry are generally metric and C based.
Chemistry and Physics work even better with Kelvin degrees, which is also the official measure unit for temperature in the SI. In addition, a lot of formulas (the first I can think of, the definition of Entropy in thermodynamic) only work if the temperatures are expressed in Kelvin degrees. Anyway, this unity of measure is not so handful (with the freezing temperature of water = 273.15K and the boiling temperature =373.15K), so it is non so strange that nearly no one uses it in everyday life.

About the other measure units, I have the impression that the most of people tend to prefer the unit they are more used to. I'm not an exception, in fact I prefer °C (that in practice here in Italy is the only one we use).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2015, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Portsmouth, UK
13,481 posts, read 9,021,847 times
Reputation: 3924
Celcius. It makes far more sense, for the reasons others have stated...

Though in the UK I think it was only in the early 80's that celcius started being used in TV weather forecasts, so the older generation still do use fahrenheit. My Mum for example has no idea what 21C is & how warm that would feel, but 70F she does. The TV forecasters in the UK will actually say what the temperatures are in fahrenheit, though the maps only show celcius, as a lot of older people still only understand that...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2015, 09:31 AM
 
615 posts, read 1,390,917 times
Reputation: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by GR1138769 View Post
Just curious do imperial countries use Rankine in science classes?
I imagine they all use Celsius or Kelvins depending on the science involved.

In the US, nobody uses Rankine for anything. The very few who have heard of it are "bookworms". Interestingly, US elementary and secondary schools (5-18 year olds) use Celsius but everyone learns Fahrenheit from family, friends and media and uses it anytime they aren't in school. In college, Celsius is used in some Classes and Kelvins in others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2015, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Paris, ÃŽle-de-France, France
2,651 posts, read 3,406,708 times
Reputation: 825
Weather, Culinary = Fahrenheit
Science, Technology = Celcius
I don't mind to use either both way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2015, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Vernon, British Columbia
3,026 posts, read 3,644,599 times
Reputation: 2191
Science uses Kelvin, not Celsius, because negative numbers associated with temperature are nonsensical in science.

As far as everyday temperatures, it's 6 of 1, and half dozen of the other... other than the fact that Fahrenheit is more precise as a whole number. When Canada switched to Celsius some 30 years ago there was a problem of comparing old records to new ones. The solution was to convert the old records (recorded to the nearest degree F) to the nearest 1/10th of a degree C. This in itself is unscientific because it shows a level of precision that isn't there. Furthermore, manual stations record the temperature to the nearest 0.5C, which is slightly more precise than the nearest 1 degree F, but it is less accurate.

Here's why. The thermometer only has marks to the nearest degree C, and the reader has to eyeball whether or not the temperature is at the 0.5 mark. Some operators simply just round to the nearest degree C, and most of the ones who do take the time to round to the nearest 0.5C have a significant bias toward rounded to the whole degree. In Fahrenheit all answers are rounded to the nearest whole degree so you don't get the same level of bias.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top