Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-15-2019, 09:30 AM
 
1 posts, read 1,629 times
Reputation: 21

Advertisements

Fellow Coloradans (or anyone else willing to chime in!),

As you know, this whole "legalized" marijuana issue has become a bit of a challenge when it comes to finding employees who can keep themselves clean. At my company, a big part of our employees' role is to travel to countries all over the world to do ground surveys. Before purchasing plane tickets, we require employees to undergo a drug test to ensure that we won't have any issues while employees travel.

Most employees are straightforward and will let me know beforehand that they won't pass the test; an honesty which I appreciate. A couple days ago however, an employee deliberately brought a clean urine sample to his test with the intent of cheating and deceiving the system. He is a valuable employee and I really like the guy, but at the end of the day, can I trust him? He humbly came to me and spoke with me face to face about what happened because he wanted to be open about it rather than me hearing about it from another source. I don't think he would have done so had he not been caught.

I could simply restrict him from traveling ever again, or I could just let him go based on the overall possibility of future dishonesty.

What would you do?

Last edited by garylancelot; 05-15-2019 at 09:43 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-15-2019, 09:35 AM
 
780 posts, read 425,939 times
Reputation: 1134
Quote:
Originally Posted by garylancelot View Post
Fellow Coloradans (or anyone else willing to chime in!),

As you know, this whole "legalized" marijuana issue has become a bit of a challenge when it comes to finding employees who can keep themselves clean. At my company, a big part of our employees' role is to travel to countries all over the world to do ground surveys. Before purchasing plane tickets, we require employees to undergo a drug test to ensure that we won't have any issues while employees travel.

<p>Most employees are straightforward and will let me know beforehand that they won't pass the test; an honesty which I appreciate. A couple days ago however, an employee deliberately brought a clean urine sample to his test with the intent of cheating and deceiving the system. He is a valuable employee and I really like the guy, but at the end of the day, can I trust him? He humbly came to me and spoke with me face to face about what happened because he wanted to be open about it rather than me hearing about it from another source. I don't think he would have done so had he not been caught.

I could simply restrict him from traveling ever again, or I could just let him go based on the overall possibility of future dishonesty.

What would you do?
If you consider him a valuable asset, then perhaps you can consider this a 'Strike 1'.

People are fallible, and sometimes they make mistakes or bad decisions. This has become quite a big dilemma in states were cannabis has been legalized, but where many companies still view it as a major liability. Ultimately, this did not cost your business this time, but I think it's fair that you keep a close on him going forward until he builds that trust back.

It's your call at the end of the day. You come across as sincere and compassionate, so I think that whatever conclusion you come to will be fair.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 09:59 AM
 
3,129 posts, read 1,333,862 times
Reputation: 2493
Quote:
Originally Posted by garylancelot View Post
Fellow Coloradans (or anyone else willing to chime in!),

As you know, this whole "legalized" marijuana issue has become a bit of a challenge when it comes to finding employees who can keep themselves clean. At my company, a big part of our employees' role is to travel to countries all over the world to do ground surveys. Before purchasing plane tickets, we require employees to undergo a drug test to ensure that we won't have any issues while employees travel.

Most employees are straightforward and will let me know beforehand that they won't pass the test; an honesty which I appreciate. A couple days ago however, an employee deliberately brought a clean urine sample to his test with the intent of cheating and deceiving the system. He is a valuable employee and I really like the guy, but at the end of the day, can I trust him? He humbly came to me and spoke with me face to face about what happened because he wanted to be open about it rather than me hearing about it from another source. I don't think he would have done so had he not been caught.

I could simply restrict him from traveling ever again, or I could just let him go based on the overall possibility of future dishonesty.

What would you do?
When you step back and look at the big picture, this doesn't make any sense.

You test for PAST marijuana use because you want "to ensure that we won't have any issues while employees travel."

What? Do you test for alcohol or caffeine or nicotine use too before allowing them to travel?

That fact that marijuana testing is separate and treated differently is because of residual stigma. I'm afraid it will linger for quite some time.

But the marijuana testing you are doing is almost certainly testing for PAST use. Almost all THC tests test for this inactive metabolite that stays in your system for a while (up to 30 days in some cases). When you stop to think about it, it's ridiculous. So much so that legislation has been introduced help prevent companies from doing exactly what you are contemplating doing.

I have a feeling this otherwise honest, healthy, valuable employee "cheated" because he knew the lingering stigma could get him fired, or at least stared at differently every time he encountered you, if he came to you and explained the situation. In this way, even regular, healthy, productive citizens of a legal state still has to live their life in the closet.

I would not penalize this employee for doing what he had to do to maneuver through a minefield of overly-restrictive, overly-stigmatized regulations that have nothing to do with his role as a valuable employee.

If you have the power to determine how liberally or conservatively to apply these overly-restrictive, overly-stigmatized regulations, take responsibility and do the right thing. It will still be quite some time before your company changes the regulations, so don't penalize this person. To do so would just add to the already tragically high cost we've had to pay for the continuing War On Drugs.

Last edited by Raddo; 05-15-2019 at 10:35 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 10:10 AM
 
Location: The Bayou State
686 posts, read 1,102,181 times
Reputation: 967
Whatever you do, be consistent with all employees, and have a written policy that you can point to, and apply it consistently. Otherwise you open yourself up to lawsuits from disgruntled employees.

I don't envy any employer who feels he has to consider these things in hire/fire decisions, but do you do the same with alcohol use? Or other drug use, including Rx pill users? Where does it end?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 10:31 AM
 
4,717 posts, read 3,271,617 times
Reputation: 12122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raddo View Post
When you step back and look at the big picture, this doesn't make any sense.

You test for PAST marijuana use because you want "to ensure that we won't have any issues while employees travel."

What? Do you test for alcohol or caffeine or nicotine use too before allowing them to travel?

That fact that marijuana testing is separate and treated differently is because of residual stigma. I'm afraid it will linger for quite some time.
Alcohol, caffeine and nicotine are not illegal in most countries (other than alcohol being illegal in some heavily Muslim countries).

It's a tricky issue and I don't have an answer- I support the decriminalization of marijuana but in many countries if you're caught with it you're in deep trouble and the US embassy isn't going to be able to do a thing. I can see why the OP would want to avoid that happening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 10:33 AM
 
3,129 posts, read 1,333,862 times
Reputation: 2493
Quote:
Originally Posted by athena53 View Post
Alcohol, caffeine and nicotine are not illegal in most countries (other than alcohol being illegal in some heavily Muslim countries).

It's a tricky issue and I don't have an answer- I support the decriminalization of marijuana but in many countries if you're caught with it you're in deep trouble and the US embassy isn't going to be able to do a thing. I can see why the OP would want to avoid that happening.
Warning employees before their trip to not take any with them is just common sense.

Punishing them for something they took to help them sleep or for something they did at a friend's house a week and a half ago is draconian.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 10:44 AM
 
780 posts, read 425,939 times
Reputation: 1134
Quote:
Originally Posted by athena53 View Post
Alcohol, caffeine and nicotine are not illegal in most countries (other than alcohol being illegal in some heavily Muslim countries).

It's a tricky issue and I don't have an answer- I support the decriminalization of marijuana but in many countries if you're caught with it you're in deep trouble and the US embassy isn't going to be able to do a thing. I can see why the OP would want to avoid that happening.
I don't believe OP was referring to these employees taking it with them on these trips. I think he was referring to a standard policy where they test employees for marijuana in their systems due to past use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Victory Mansions, Airstrip One
6,762 posts, read 5,063,975 times
Reputation: 9214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raddo View Post
But the marijuana testing you are doing is almost certainly testing for PAST use. Almost all THC tests test for this inactive metabolite that stays in your system for a while (up to 30 days in some cases). When you stop to think about it, it's ridiculous. So much so that legislation has been introduced help prevent companies from doing exactly what you are contemplating doing.

I have a feeling this otherwise honest, healthy, valuable employee "cheated" because he knew the lingering stigma could get him fired, or at least stared at differently every time he encountered you, if he came to you and explained the situation. In this way, even regular, healthy, productive citizens of a legal state still has to live their life in the closet.

Such legislation will send some employers running to other states, so be careful what you wish for.


Also, there are jobs where safety or lives are at stake. Would you like your newborn to be watched by an ICU nurse who tests positive? I certainly wouldn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 10:52 AM
 
3,129 posts, read 1,333,862 times
Reputation: 2493
Quote:
Originally Posted by hikernut View Post
Such legislation will send some employers running to other states, so be careful what you wish for.


Also, there are jobs where safety or lives are at stake. Would you like your newborn to be watched by an ICU nurse who tests positive? I certainly wouldn't.
If you understood exactly what "testing positive" meant, then you wouldn't care so much.

But widespread ignorance still reigns supreme when it comes to this plant and its effects on the humans that consume it.

Running to other states would be a complete waste of time and money, because legalization and sane marijuana laws are coming, no matter which state you choose to flee to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 10:56 AM
 
2,175 posts, read 4,301,988 times
Reputation: 3491
Dishonest is dishonest and is often a pattern. Fire him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top