Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Was it necessary to construct Esperanto?
Yes 7 23.33%
No 23 76.67%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-08-2017, 07:13 AM
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
11,655 posts, read 12,966,685 times
Reputation: 6391

Advertisements

Esperanto is an artificial language invented by Polish-Jewish ophthalmologist L. L. Zamenhof in 1887. Up to two million people worldwide speak Esperanto, including about 1,000 to 2,000 native speakers who learned it from birth. Its usage is highest in Europe, East Asia, and South America. It has vocabulary mainly from Romance and Germanic languages (but more with the former). Its grammar and phonology is similar to Slavic languages.

Do you think Esperanto is beneficial or rather redundant?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-08-2017, 07:22 AM
 
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
1,736 posts, read 2,528,814 times
Reputation: 1340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
Esperanto is an artificial language invented by Polish-Jewish ophthalmologist L. L. Zamenhof in 1887. Up to two million people worldwide speak Esperanto, including about 1,000 to 2,000 native speakers who learned it from birth. Its usage is highest in Europe, East Asia, and South America. It has vocabulary mainly from Romance and Germanic languages (but more with the former). Its grammar and phonology is similar to Slavic languages.

Do you think Esperanto is beneficial or rather redundant?
Useless for practical purposes, but it's good as a path for learning Indo-European languages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2017, 07:23 AM
 
Location: Scotland
7,956 posts, read 11,850,606 times
Reputation: 4167
I think it is rather cool a man made this up and it is spoken so widely. I can barely speak English never mind invent a coherent language!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2017, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Estonia
1,704 posts, read 1,838,977 times
Reputation: 2293
Pointless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2017, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Denver, CO
2,858 posts, read 2,176,383 times
Reputation: 3032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
Esperanto is an artificial language invented by Polish-Jewish ophthalmologist L. L. Zamenhof in 1887. Up to two million people worldwide speak Esperanto, including about 1,000 to 2,000 native speakers who learned it from birth. Its usage is highest in Europe, East Asia, and South America. It has vocabulary mainly from Romance and Germanic languages (but more with the former). Its grammar and phonology is similar to Slavic languages.

Do you think Esperanto is beneficial or rather redundant?
It is as beneficial or redundant as Klingon or the Elfish language that Tolkien invented.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2017, 01:05 PM
 
4,432 posts, read 6,986,643 times
Reputation: 2261
Well the vote be better if there are Esperanto speakers or people that have tried to learn this language here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2017, 06:32 PM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,935,688 times
Reputation: 4943
Well it was originally designed as a lingua Franca, but since English took that role it's pretty useless in that regard. However it is a great tool for introducing people to learning other languages. It's very easy to learn (from what I hear) and gives you a good grasp on what grammar is and how languages are constructed, on top of that the vocabulary is based on real words from other languages so it makes it easier to learn other European languages afterwards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2017, 06:49 PM
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
11,655 posts, read 12,966,685 times
Reputation: 6391
Quote:
Originally Posted by grega94 View Post
Well it was originally designed as a lingua Franca, but since English took that role it's pretty useless in that regard. However it is a great tool for introducing people to learning other languages. It's very easy to learn (from what I hear) and gives you a good grasp on what grammar is and how languages are constructed, on top of that the vocabulary is based on real words from other languages so it makes it easier to learn other European languages afterwards.
Took the words right out of my mouth. I couldn't agree more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2017, 12:32 AM
 
1 posts, read 664 times
Reputation: 15
Default Esperanto - a remarkable success story

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabio SBA View Post
Useless for practical purposes, but it's good as a path for learning Indo-European languages.
I see Esperanto as a remarkable success story, by far the most successful auxiliary language. It has survived wars and revolutions and economic crises and continues to attract people to learn and speak it. Over 750,000 people have signed up to the Duolingo Esperanto course in the last year. Esperanto works. I’ve used it in about twenty countries over recent years. I recommend it to anyone, as a way of making friendly local contacts in other countries. Esperanto is useful as well as serving as a good introduction to learning other languages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2017, 03:57 AM
 
6,112 posts, read 3,927,307 times
Reputation: 2243
It's a neat idea, but it never really took off. For better or worse English has already assumed the role that Esparanto was supposed to fulfill.

A simplified form of English known as Basic English is said to be far easier to learn: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_English

The English language has relatively simple grammar rules, and is supposedly easy to learn, but the big problem is the unphonetic writing system. If that could be reformed then English would be ideal as a universal language not simply because geopolitics made it that way, but rather because it's the easiest to learn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top