Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Writing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-03-2010, 04:31 AM
 
1 posts, read 1,099 times
Reputation: 12

Advertisements

My apologies if this has been brought up before.

It makes me insanely irritated when people purposely lie to make themselves look better. Not by making an innocent exaggeration, but a real, quantitative lie.

It is when they say "more than" X amount of something to imply an abundance of stuff or "less than" to imply something scarce, exotic and rare.

Here's an example from an article from examiner.com:

"...the TechArt Magnum (a car based on the design of the Porsche Cayenne but with less than 500 in production)..."

The article elaborates on how this car is so exotic that less than 500 are in production.

Then, in the next paragraph it tries to explain the incredible success of this car:

"With more than 500 produced units, the Magnum is the most successful model in the 20-year history of TechArt."

Wait a second...

Didn't the author just tell me the production number was less than 500? Or are these numbers just made up to make the car look splendid in every situation?

What if it was actually 496? Would they still say "over 500" to give the impression of high production? And if the number was actually 517, would they still claim a production of "less than 500" to suggest a rare car?

What really irritates me, is that people who use these phrases are trying to pass these numbers off as facts, when they have no basis in reality whatsoever. They are deliberately trying to con me, and it's not only marketing people who do this...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-03-2010, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,048 posts, read 34,724,119 times
Reputation: 10623
Quote:
Originally Posted by CNSZU View Post
What really irritates me, is that people who use these phrases are trying to pass these numbers off as facts, when they have no basis in reality whatsoever. They are deliberately trying to con me, and it's not only marketing people who do this...
You've hit the nail squarely on the head. Unfortunately, it's not even remotely possible to snap one's fingers and make all the lying (excuse me; I meant to say advertising) disappear.

Always remember the wise words of Mark Twain...

There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2010, 01:05 PM
 
4,049 posts, read 5,046,670 times
Reputation: 1333
Quote:
Originally Posted by CNSZU View Post
My apologies if this has been brought up before.

It makes me insanely irritated when people purposely lie to make themselves look better. Not by making an innocent exaggeration, but a real, quantitative lie.

It is when they say "more than" X amount of something to imply an abundance of stuff or "less than" to imply something scarce, exotic and rare.

Here's an example from an article from examiner.com:

"...the TechArt Magnum (a car based on the design of the Porsche Cayenne but with less than 500 in production)..."

The article elaborates on how this car is so exotic that less than 500 are in production.

Then, in the next paragraph it tries to explain the incredible success of this car:

"With more than 500 produced units, the Magnum is the most successful model in the 20-year history of TechArt."

Wait a second...

Didn't the author just tell me the production number was less than 500? Or are these numbers just made up to make the car look splendid in every situation?

What if it was actually 496? Would they still say "over 500" to give the impression of high production? And if the number was actually 517, would they still claim a production of "less than 500" to suggest a rare car?

What really irritates me, is that people who use these phrases are trying to pass these numbers off as facts, when they have no basis in reality whatsoever. They are deliberately trying to con me, and it's not only marketing people who do this...
Ah, weasel language. Ads are full of it.

At first glance I thought there were two different cars, but man it's even stupider than I thought! I was thinking that the writer was selling one car and using its less than 500 copies as a selling point, and then turning around and using the opposite (more than 500 copies) as a selling point for a different car. A weasely practice for sure. But to use the two mutually exclusive selling points for the same car, in the same article.. man that's beyond stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Writing

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top