Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-04-2016, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,265,185 times
Reputation: 7790

Advertisements

If you're going to extend heavy rail all the way out to the Mall of Georgia, might as well go one final stop to the Hamilton Mill park&ride, at the end of the county.

Definitely at least have the space to build the line along the side of the highway, out there.

And, I do really like the idea of splitting off for a spur line along 316, with Gwinnett Place as the last transfer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-04-2016, 01:32 PM
bu2
 
24,108 posts, read 14,891,132 times
Reputation: 12952
Sounds like they are just brainstorming.

But I agree, Gwinnett Place Mall would be about as far as HRT or LRT would make sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2016, 01:58 PM
 
4,010 posts, read 3,753,785 times
Reputation: 1967
Quote:
Originally Posted by primaltech View Post
If you're going to extend heavy rail all the way out to the Mall of Georgia, might as well go one final stop to the Hamilton Mill park&ride, at the end of the county.

Definitely at least have the space to build the line along the side of the highway, out there.

And, I do really like the idea of splitting off for a spur line along 316, with Gwinnett Place as the last transfer.
They didnt even bring up the southeastern part of the county around east of Stone Mountain
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2016, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,695,326 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
Sounds like they are just brainstorming.

But I agree, Gwinnett Place Mall would be about as far as HRT or LRT would make sense.
The way their brainstorming is being reported makes it seem like they're using it to dismiss MARTA early.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2016, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
332 posts, read 344,457 times
Reputation: 287
Yep, and using eye popping figures like $7 billion (oh the humanity) to show voters, see that's alot of money!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2016, 07:50 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,265,185 times
Reputation: 7790
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccdscott View Post
Yep, and using eye popping figures like $7 billion (oh the humanity) to show voters, see that's alot of money!
Yeah, I mean, they don't dare say, "Just a simple 1% sales tax over 40 years to join MARTA, that would bring us up to a reasonable 7% total (same rate as Fulton and DeKalb), and would fund however many billion dollars of multiple high quality transit lines serving the whole county, plus go ahead and double that funding amount because of federal 1 to 1 matching, and that 1% tax would easily cover our county's transit needs for now and well into the future, easing everyone's commute times every day and giving people options."

Because that would just be too honest!

And honestly, MARTA wouldn't even be required to do that. They could always tax themselves 1% for their own comprehensive rapid transit system if that's what they want to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2016, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,872,089 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by primaltech View Post
Yeah, I mean, they don't dare say, "Just a simple 1% sales tax over 40 years to join MARTA, that would bring us up to a reasonable 7% total (same rate as Fulton and DeKalb), and would fund however many billion dollars of multiple high quality transit lines serving the whole county, plus go ahead and double that funding amount because of federal 1 to 1 matching, and that 1% tax would easily cover our county's transit needs for now and well into the future, easing everyone's commute times every day and giving people options."

Because that would just be too honest!

And honestly, MARTA wouldn't even be required to do that. They could always tax themselves 1% for their own comprehensive rapid transit system if that's what they want to do.
To the county leadership, that would be turning over control to the Atlanta-dominated agency and democrat leadership.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2016, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,695,326 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
To the county leadership, that would be turning over control to the Atlanta-dominated agency and democrat leadership.
Which doesn't make much sense, really. Gwinnett would be the one with the leveraging power here. They're the ones who have the money. They can negotiate pretty much as much of their 1% allocated to rail and high-capacity transit to nearly any node or along any corridor as they want.

Of course MARTA would like to confirm that those corridors are feasible, but Gwinnett would be the one laying down the ground rules. For as long (and that would be a long time) as those expansions are being paid off, Gwinnett would have control over their own county's service.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2016, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,265,185 times
Reputation: 7790
They don't want to admit what they are, which is, a residential suburb of Atlanta. They're totally dependent on Atlanta and the inner counties, from the office jobs, to the major commercial airport, to supply chain logistics, to everything.

If they had all those things covered on their own, if their residents all worked inside the county, that would be a different story. But, that's not the case. They are located in Metropolitan Atlanta, which already has a Rapid Transit Authority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2016, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,872,089 times
Reputation: 5703
Default Lt Governor Cagle talks about regional transit and vetoed bills

Georgia Lt. Gov. Cagle Discusses Regional Transit, Vetoed Bills | WABE 90.1 FM
Quote:
Republican Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle is proposing a major overhaul of the board that governs MARTA, in exchange for something MARTA has long wanted: state funding. The proposed change would be a step in developing a larger, regional transit system for the Atlanta area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top