Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-28-2016, 03:16 PM
 
10,974 posts, read 10,877,894 times
Reputation: 3435

Advertisements

GDOT seeks input on widening I-85 in Gwinnett County

Quote:
The Georgia Department of Transportation will hold two public information meetings to discuss the proposed Interstate 85 widening project in Gwinnett.

...

The length of both projects combined is approximately 24 miles. The proposed projects would widen and reconstruct approximately 12.7 miles of I-85 from north of Interstate 985 to just north of State Route 211 and 11.3 miles of I-85 from just north of State Route 211 to just north of U.S. 129.

The proposed project would use the existing right-of-way width to accommodate the widening. The typical section will be expanded from two lanes to three lanes in each direction. The existing grassed median along the 6.4-mile section of I-85 from Hamilton Mill Road/CR 134 to SR 211 will be replaced with a median barrier and 9-foot to 12-foot inside shoulders.

The project also proposes to replace four I-85 overpass bridges at Spout Springs Road, Flowery Branch Road, Jesse Cronic Road and SR 332. The project proposes to close the overpass bridges for replacement and detour traffic during construction.
Hasn't worked for the last 60 years, but GDOT still keeps trying to defy induced demand. So get ready for even more cars getting funneled down I-85.

Also like how the cost often gets left off when we talk about highway projects, yet is the central focus of transit projects. But from looking at comparable highway costs, this project is at least on the same scale at the downtown streetcar, if not many times more expensive especially considering that it requires multiple overpasses to be rebuilt. Yet, even once completed it will still have less capacity that the streetcar / light rail.

Here is hoping this is just a bit of the last winding down of building wider and wider freeways which only exacerbate the problem. We need to be focused on higher capacity /density transportation solutions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-28-2016, 03:26 PM
 
Location: East Side of ATL
4,586 posts, read 7,711,684 times
Reputation: 2158
Meh. It needed to be widening with all the trucking traffic in that area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2016, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Sweet Home Chicago!
6,721 posts, read 6,485,209 times
Reputation: 9915
What are they up to now, 24 lanes in each direction?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2016, 03:47 PM
 
9,008 posts, read 14,060,376 times
Reputation: 7643
What do you suggest?

Reducing it to one lane and adding a bike lane? Your solutions aren't working intown, why would they work on I-85?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2016, 04:30 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
5,621 posts, read 5,937,091 times
Reputation: 4905
Oh good grief. 85 is getting the same treatment as 75 and being widened all the way to SC over the next decade (this is actually old news). This isn't the widening of the section south of 316. This is the transitional area from suburban to exurban(especially past Hamilton Mill) to rural and has nothing, I repeat, NOTHING to do with snubbing mass transit to intown areas. This is just the first step in upgrading the entire 85 corridor to SC. Atlanta could get a SEPTA size footprint in rail and this would still happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2016, 04:43 PM
 
Location: NW Atlanta
6,503 posts, read 6,122,823 times
Reputation: 4463
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLTJL View Post
What do you suggest?

Reducing it to one lane and adding a bike lane? Your solutions aren't working intown, why would they work on I-85?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2016, 04:44 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,262,857 times
Reputation: 7790
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsvh View Post
Hasn't worked for the last 60 years
So if tonight they narrowed I-85 through the Atlanta metro, back to the 2 lanes a side that it was originally, the traffic congestion and delays tomorrow would not be 10 times worse?

Of course it has worked. The widening over the last 60 years has worked, in that it's added lots of capacity, which has allowed all the heavy daily traffic (traffic, not congestion), and all the residential growth in Gwinnett. It's just that the growth catches up and then some, and they haven't widened it by much in a while. And/or there are other bottlenecks down the road in DeKalb (such as the interchange with I-285, etc.)

If they doubled the capacity of all the metro freeways tomorrow, the congestion would be reduced heavily. But that would lead to more residential and commercial growth, and also more people long-range commuting thru the area, and probably more out of state shipping trucks. So within probably 15-20 years, the congestion would be back to the same again. But we'd have tons more metro population and a larger economy.

Induced demand doesn't make widening not work, it makes it not work forever. If they regularly added more capacity enough to meet the increased demand, then that would be a good enough solution to eliminating congestion. But they can't do that, obviously.

But that doesn't mean that widening doesn't help, or can't be part of the solution. It just needs to only be part of the solution, which is the part that Georgia never seems to figure out. There needs to be better/more usage of the existing lane capacity via space efficiency via higher occupancy vehicles (especially transit). Also, there needs to be a commuter train system totally independent of the freeway system. Need options.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamadiddle View Post
What are they up to now, 24 lanes in each direction?
I know bothering to read things is too much to ask of a Trump voter/ internet troll, but this is talking about widening a 2-lane section up in the rural north part of Gwinnett. To 3 lanes.

Last edited by primaltech; 11-28-2016 at 04:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2016, 04:53 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,262,857 times
Reputation: 7790
Quote:
Originally Posted by sedimenjerry View Post
This is the transitional area from suburban to exurban(especially past Hamilton Mill) to rural and has nothing, I repeat, NOTHING to do with snubbing mass transit to intown areas. This is just the first step in upgrading the entire 85 corridor to SC. Atlanta could get a SEPTA size footprint in rail and this would still happen.
Exactly. Thank you.

Certain ITP snobbery types around here (who have probably never been to this area in question) apparently just look for any excuses to say something negative every day about OTP/suburbs, and the existence of roads/cars as a transportation system.

And Norcross doesn't even have a freaking train stop. Hamilton Mill and the I-985 corridor isn't exactly snubbing transit for roads, here. What are they supposed to connect the hypothetical transit alternative to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2016, 04:53 PM
 
Location: Georgia
1,512 posts, read 1,963,372 times
Reputation: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLTJL View Post
What do you suggest?

Reducing it to one lane and adding a bike lane?
Not gonna lie, I yell-laughed at this.

Seriously though, anyone who's EVER driven in from South Carolina on 85 knows that 2-lane section needs to be widened. At least in Gwinnett County.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2016, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
7,582 posts, read 10,775,179 times
Reputation: 6572
Sadly, the wrong person decided to post this trying to change the tone from the beginning.

There is more than enough through-traffic in the area to warrant this.

The long-term plan is to have it be 3 lanes (each direction) to the state border, partly in hopes this will be carried out in other respective states eventually.

This has been going on in the I-75 corridors for years.

This is a part of a long-range plan that is targeting having all of our interstates up to standards in 50 years when we are a much larger state
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top