Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-11-2015, 08:01 AM
 
1,558 posts, read 2,399,843 times
Reputation: 2601

Advertisements

We are curious why it is that every time an older, smaller (2-1) home in these zip codes comes on the market, it seems to be sold to a developer or flipper? Seems like this deprives individuals or families from an opportunity to live central unless the end buyer has the means to purchase the upgraded house once finished.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-11-2015, 08:06 AM
 
Location: 57
1,427 posts, read 1,186,183 times
Reputation: 1262
Quote:
Originally Posted by orngkat View Post
We are curious why it is that every time an older, smaller (2-1) home in these zip codes comes on the market, it seems to be sold to a developer or flipper? Seems like this deprives individuals or families from an opportunity to live central unless the end buyer has the means to purchase the upgraded house once finished.
Get in there, dude!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2015, 08:28 AM
 
147 posts, read 212,767 times
Reputation: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by orngkat View Post
We are curious why it is that every time an older, smaller (2-1) home in these zip codes comes on the market, it seems to be sold to a developer or flipper? Seems like this deprives individuals or families from an opportunity to live central unless the end buyer has the means to purchase the upgraded house once finished.
Because they:

1. Market for the properties - solicit sales.
2. Pay more, and pay faster.
3. Cash is king. No contingencies, no inspections, no financing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2015, 08:41 AM
 
Location: 57
1,427 posts, read 1,186,183 times
Reputation: 1262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam.adams33 View Post
Because they:

1. Market for the properties - solicit sales.
2. Pay more, and pay faster.
3. Cash is king. No contingencies, no inspections, no financing.
That's SO unfair.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2015, 08:57 AM
 
147 posts, read 212,767 times
Reputation: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by pop251808 View Post
That's SO unfair.
I know, right?! It should totally be illegal. There should be a housing authority that determines the buyer with the greatest need for housing whenever a house is sold. This way multiple offer scenarios won't push out the little man.

Sellers are greedy anyway, the market needs to be regulated to be fair.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2015, 09:03 AM
 
Location: Warrior Country
4,573 posts, read 6,783,174 times
Reputation: 3978
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam.adams33 View Post
I know, right?! It should totally be illegal. There should be a housing authority that determines the buyer with the greatest need for housing whenever a house is sold. This way multiple offer scenarios won't push out the little man.

Sellers are greedy anyway, the market needs to be regulated to be fair.
Correct. If the buyers eat meat, don't drive a prius & hand out first place trophies (instead of participation trophies).... then they should have to pay a premium.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2015, 09:06 AM
 
Location: SW Austin & Wimberley
6,333 posts, read 18,058,399 times
Reputation: 5532
Quote:
Originally Posted by orngkat View Post
We are curious why it is that every time an older, smaller (2-1) home in these zip codes comes on the market, it seems to be sold to a developer or flipper? Seems like this deprives individuals or families from an opportunity to live central unless the end buyer has the means to purchase the upgraded house once finished.
Because the house is worth less than the lot it sits on.

The original 2/1s are functionally obsolete except to a small subset of buyer who value the location and price point of a smaller, older house more than they do the creature comforts of a large, modern more expensive home. Most are in the latter category so the market produces product to fill that demand.

Steve
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2015, 09:12 AM
 
Location: 57
1,427 posts, read 1,186,183 times
Reputation: 1262
Quote:
Originally Posted by austin-steve View Post
Because the house is worth less than the lot it sits on.

The original 2/1s are functionally obsolete except to a small subset of buyer who value the location and price point of a smaller, older house more than they do the creature comforts of a large, modern more expensive home. Most are in the latter category so the market produces product to fill that demand.

Steve
True enough. But too bad COA development rules keep people from building what would meet market demand, absent those rules. COA design guidelines are trying to "refresh" mid-century suburbs in 150% scale!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2015, 09:39 AM
 
1,558 posts, read 2,399,843 times
Reputation: 2601
Quote:
a small subset of buyer who value the location and price point of a smaller, older house
Kind of sad though that there isn't even the opportunity for those wishing to buy a smaller home and perhaps fix up a little at a time. Amazing how standards of what home buyers "need" in a home has escalated in the past few years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2015, 10:01 AM
 
Location: 57
1,427 posts, read 1,186,183 times
Reputation: 1262
Quote:
Originally Posted by orngkat View Post
Kind of sad though that there isn't even the opportunity for those wishing to buy a smaller home and perhaps fix up a little at a time. Amazing how standards of what home buyers "need" in a home has escalated in the past few years.
Hopeful Buyers CAN buy. But they have to have cash ready to close FAST after making an offer to a potential seller (many of these old houses don't make it to a listing, let alone MLS), they have to, like a developer, assume the house is substandard and forget doing any due diligence after making a concrete offer, and that's about it.
As to your second statement above, I agree completely, it's kind of disgusting, really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top