Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-16-2011, 07:43 PM
 
3,128 posts, read 6,537,133 times
Reputation: 1599

Advertisements

We Pay More to Drive Than We Spend on Taxes | Moneyland | TIME.com


Your thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-16-2011, 08:57 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,868 posts, read 25,167,969 times
Reputation: 19093
LOL that's hilarious. I pay more in payroll taxes than on transportation. On top of the 15.3% (reduced to 13.3% for this year only) there are income, sales, and property taxes. I guess for a family who insists on driving two fairly new CamCord type cars, it's possible. $50,000 for a two-worker family translates to $12.50 an hour, however, which is basically working poor. The working poor has always had it tough. If it's a one-come household, then there's no reason they need two cars. I wouldn't ever spend 20% of my net income on transportation, but people are free to choose to spend their money as they want whatever their income level. There are certainly people stretching into luxury cars and paying that kind of money as well. If that means moving out to the suburbs and buying two CamCords to ferry you to your low-level job 30 miles away, so be it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 09:41 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica, CA
1,626 posts, read 4,015,937 times
Reputation: 742
Catchy title but a family making $50-60k would not be paying much in income taxes. So it's really just a clever play on words to say they spend more on cars than taxes. Beyond that though $10k a year (I'm assuming that's for two cars) is an awful lot of money for a family to be spending on transportion on such a modest income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 10:02 PM
 
3,044 posts, read 5,003,619 times
Reputation: 3324
We could say someone living in CA making $100,000/year would pay about 28% federal, 9% state, 5% SS/Medicare, 8% sales, for a total of about 50% of income going to taxes (add in others like property and its even higher). If they're spending more on their car, they've got problems.

Or we can look at a single person making $50,000/year. Pay a federal income tax of 25%, or $12,500, which is still higher than the quoted $10,000.

Or look at a family making $60,000 a year with a tax rate of 15% pays $9,000 in federal tax. Add in state, property, sales, etc, and it's more than $10,000.

So basically, they found just one instance (cost of driving vs federal income tax for joint filing at $60,000) to try and say people spend too much on transportation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 11:40 PM
 
Location: Coastal Connecticut
21,770 posts, read 28,108,607 times
Reputation: 6711
Most people don't make enough to pay taxes, so I can see how they could make that generalization.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,868 posts, read 25,167,969 times
Reputation: 19093
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnytang24 View Post
We could say someone living in CA making $100,000/year would pay about 28% federal, 9% state, 5% SS/Medicare, 8% sales, for a total of about 50% of income going to taxes (add in others like property and its even higher). If they're spending more on their car, they've got problems.

Or we can look at a single person making $50,000/year. Pay a federal income tax of 25%, or $12,500, which is still higher than the quoted $10,000.

Or look at a family making $60,000 a year with a tax rate of 15% pays $9,000 in federal tax. Add in state, property, sales, etc, and it's more than $10,000.

So basically, they found just one instance (cost of driving vs federal income tax for joint filing at $60,000) to try and say people spend too much on transportation.
Except they're married and so it's 15% above $17,000. They're MAGI is probably 30,000. So they're only paying 15% on around $10,000 and another 10% on $20,000 -- 1500+2000=3500. Plus they probably have some tax credits that drop that down even further.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 10:30 AM
 
Location: MO->MI->CA->TX->MA
7,032 posts, read 14,488,806 times
Reputation: 5581
Lol, I "pay" more in Taxes than any other item in my monthly budget..

~$800 in taxes
~$600 rent
~$150 transportation (gas + insurance, car fully paid off.)

Even if we total the amount of taxes I've paid vs. the amount I've spent on the car (including gas, insurance, etc.) taxes still end up taking the bigger chunk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 12:55 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,744 posts, read 58,090,525 times
Reputation: 46231
Quote:
Originally Posted by ragnarkar View Post
Lol, I "pay" more in Taxes than any other item in my monthly budget..
Me too, transportation is not even a blip on the radar screen.

I drive a $35 car than gets 50 mpg on free fryer grease, $240/ yr insurance, get tires from wrecking yard... & feed family on $100/ month.

BUT:
1000/ month in property taxes alone (not figuring a zillion other taxes from fuel / phone / to personal property)
1200 / month basic health insurance....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 02:07 PM
 
Location: NY
9,130 posts, read 20,021,316 times
Reputation: 11707
Is this accurate? That family must have a lot more tax breaks than I do.

It alleges the family spends $10K a year on automobile related expenses. My federal. state, and property income taxes last year were about $17,000. Add in sales tax at 8.75% and I could buy a new car every year for what I spend on taxes.

In comparison, my operating expenses were $1000 for insurance, $1800 for gas, and I will figure about $6000 for the car (although it is paid off, if I had a loan that would likely be the yearly cost). Even with other maintenance, it pails in comparison to my taxes.

I guess I need more deductions!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 04:20 PM
 
Location: Northwest Indiana
815 posts, read 2,999,728 times
Reputation: 1072
There is NO way that I pay less taxes then car expenses. Not even close.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top