Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-27-2012, 09:59 AM
 
2,720 posts, read 5,627,258 times
Reputation: 1320

Advertisements

I don't understand what is so aggresive and nasty about the car? And what's wrong with that anyways?

I see your point about the non-Ram Air, non-WS6 Trans Ams and Firebirds before '01, but the 02 last year models are pretty beast.

For a car packing 325 hp, sounds like a tank when you start it, and has a nasty aggressive look to it. It's the best bargain for anyone looking for power.

I have also heard that the 02 actually came stock 350 hp but they advertized it as only having 325 to not compete too heavily with the Corvette. Is this true or just a big myth?

Regardless, we're talking about a car that can match a low model Porsche at low cost.

In the hierarchy of cars (pre-2010) goes:

1. Viper
2. Corvette Z06, Standard
3. 02 Trans Am WS6
4. Camaro SS
5. Camaro Z28
6. Mustang GT, Bullit,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-27-2012, 10:04 AM
 
1,558 posts, read 4,785,095 times
Reputation: 1106
For me Trans Ams from the 80s will always be cool.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 10:06 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
5,994 posts, read 20,093,452 times
Reputation: 4078
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarcelonaFan View Post
I don't understand what is so aggresive and nasty about the car? And what's wrong with that anyways?

I see your point about the non-Ram Air, non-WS6 Trans Ams and Firebirds before '01, but the 02 last year models are pretty beast.

For a car packing 325 hp, sounds like a tank when you start it, and has a nasty aggressive look to it. It's the best bargain for anyone looking for power.

I have also heard that the 02 actually came stock 350 hp but they advertized it as only having 325 to not compete too heavily with the Corvette. Is this true or just a big myth?

Regardless, we're talking about a car that can match a low model Porsche at low cost.

In the hierarchy of cars (pre-2010) goes:

1. Viper
2. Corvette Z06, Standard
3. 02 Trans Am WS6
4. Camaro SS
5. Camaro Z28
6. Mustang GT, Bullit,
No one is doubting the straight line performance aspect. It's the styling that I'm not a fan of. I'm talking specifically about the 2002 WS6 although older Transams/Firebirds were equally unattractive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 10:07 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
5,994 posts, read 20,093,452 times
Reputation: 4078
Quote:
Originally Posted by duster1979 View Post
When I first read this I wondered what the heck you were talking about. I assume you're referring to the 1977-1978 model. OP has a 2002. Hidden headlights, no honeycomb anywhere. Unless he's got a Jimmie Rodgers CD in the stereo.
No I was talking specifically about the 2002.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Keosauqua, Iowa
9,614 posts, read 21,273,013 times
Reputation: 13670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalbo View Post
For me Trans Ams from the 80s will always be cool.
That's because you love David Hasselhoff.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Keosauqua, Iowa
9,614 posts, read 21,273,013 times
Reputation: 13670
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTsLiKeAnEgG View Post
No I was talking specifically about the 2002.
Then explain what you mean by "honeycomb headlights."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 10:12 AM
 
2,720 posts, read 5,627,258 times
Reputation: 1320
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTsLiKeAnEgG View Post
No one is doubting the straight line performance aspect. It's the styling that I'm not a fan of. I'm talking specifically about the 2002 WS6 although older Transams/Firebirds were equally unattractive.
Well I certainly agree with in regards to the non-Ram Am Air Firebirds. They're downright ugly.

But the improvement made with the 02 WS6 was amazing. It put it up there with the Corvette and the Viper as far as style and power.

The 60s Trans Am are beast too. They only started to get ugly in the 80s but much like most of the cars during the 80s, there were no exceptions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 10:13 AM
 
2,720 posts, read 5,627,258 times
Reputation: 1320
Quote:
Originally Posted by duster1979 View Post
Then explain what you mean by "honeycomb headlights."
I think he means the back rear lights. They look like honey combs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,534,474 times
Reputation: 8075
Quote:
Originally Posted by duster1979 View Post
When I first read this I wondered what the heck you were talking about. I assume you're referring to the 1977-1978 model. OP has a 2002. Hidden headlights, no honeycomb anywhere. Unless he's got a Jimmie Rodgers CD in the stereo.
My problem with performance pontiacs of this era were the nostrils, the multiple nose scoops (some real, some fake) which were the era's version of the screaming chicken of the 1970s. Gaudi!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 10:17 AM
 
Location: WNC
1,571 posts, read 2,969,405 times
Reputation: 1621
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarcelonaFan View Post

Regardless, we're talking about a car that can match a low model Porsche at low cost.

In the hierarchy of cars (pre-2010) goes:

1. Viper
2. Corvette Z06, Standard
3. 02 Trans Am WS6
4. Camaro SS
5. Camaro Z28
6. Mustang GT, Bullit,

Ive always liked F-bodies, but you're missing a few cars. You've forgotten about the base Corvette, the Shelby GT500 mustang(as well as lower Shelby models), and I'll even throw in the STi's and Evo's, which they might have a little less power, but they are a more well rounded performance car. In regards to the Porsche though, when comparing the two, who wouldnt take even a Boxster over the WS6? Granted the WS6 should be faster in a straight line, but the Porsche is about way more than straight line speed. The driving experience of the Porsche to the Pontiac is not even comparable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top