Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-20-2013, 04:09 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, Texas
4,287 posts, read 8,030,653 times
Reputation: 3938

Advertisements

This all occurred while I was abroad, so I don't have the best description of details, please forgive me. A couple of weeks ago, a relative was involved in an accident. He was in the left lane of a 5-lane access road. (Yes, there are access roads that huge in Texas). The left lane could go only left while the adjacent lane could make a left turn or go straight.

Well, this old geezer just cuts him off completely instead of going either forward or making a left turn and my family member evades him, crashing into the curb & causing damage to our vehicle. The old geezer was kind enough to stop and check if he was okay, exchanging information & waiting for the police.

Fast forward two weeks. We receive notice that his insurance company will not pay anything because "it wasn't their fault". "No contact" or some such crap. If their incompetent client didn't do what he did, we wouldn't have had to make an evasive maneuver! Ridiculous. It turns out that the other guy is changing his story now! What?!

Well, if he didn't do anything and wasn't at fault, then why did he stop to exchange information & why is there a police report? Ridiculous. Looks like we'll have to pay out of pocket for a bit of the repair, but the deductible is taking care of most of it. Still.....extremely annoying.

What would you guys do in such a situation? Besides making old people get off the roads or take classes?

Thank you in advance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-20-2013, 04:15 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX USA
5,251 posts, read 14,248,351 times
Reputation: 8231
Unfortunaly they are right, if there was no contact, the driver of your vehilce is at fault for "failure to maintain control of the vehicle" If the other drive would have hit you, it would have been there fault, but since there was no contact they arnt responsible for anything.
Its the same thing as if you swerve to avoid a deer, it would be collision, and at fault, but if you were to hit the animal it would be comp not at fault.

It sucks, but its how insurance works
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 04:20 PM
 
Location: So. of Rosarito, Baja, Mexico
6,987 posts, read 21,929,654 times
Reputation: 7007
Since there was NO contact between the vehicles your SOL.

As a Judge once told me in small claims court I was driving too fast for existing conditions.....15 MPH...get my drift?

Going into a curb/fence/wall/tree in a evasive move still makes the driver in question SOL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 04:21 PM
 
Location: NJ
17,573 posts, read 46,144,871 times
Reputation: 16279
So what does the police report say?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2013, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Walton County, GA
1,242 posts, read 3,480,173 times
Reputation: 1049
Well, you can pay your insurance deductible and get it fixed. This may increase your premiums. If its not to much, you can fix it all yourself, no insurance, no premium hike.

Unfortunately, your family member is at fault for the wreck. If they were to hit the other guy, they most likely would not be at fault.

Back in 2011, I swerved to avoid a drunk that pulled out in front of me. I hit a patch of ice and spun into a curb. I was not ticketed, but it was marked as an at fault for crossing the double yellow avoid her. Sucks, but that's how it is. The cop even said not to swerve because if you then hit anything, its your move that caused it.

Now, in the last 3 months, I have had two people pull out right in front of me. Now, instead of trying to miss, I just slam on brakes. Unfortunately, I rear ended both. We all know the saying, you rear end someone, you will be at fault. WRONG. Both times, they have been cited and at fault.

Use their wreck as a learning experience. It wasnt the old guy driving that caused the accident, it was the driver that avoided the old guy that caused the wreck. If they didnt try to avoid it, it would have been a different type of wreck that would have showed the old guys negligence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2013, 07:36 AM
C8N
 
1,119 posts, read 3,227,485 times
Reputation: 778
Wow... that sucks big time.
It's a pretty stupid policy tho. For most people, it would be reflex to try to avoid the collision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2013, 08:29 AM
 
Location: NJ
17,573 posts, read 46,144,871 times
Reputation: 16279
I imagine part of the problem is proving what happened. Without any contact that would be difficult.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2013, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,992,173 times
Reputation: 36644
First of all, there are two separate assignations of fault. The police at the scene can assign fault to a driver, and cite the driver for a traffic law infraction, subjecting him to a fine. Sometimes both drivers are given tickets for violations.

Then, later, the insurance companies investigate the accident, not necessarily arriving at the same conclusion as the police.

There is wording in your insurance policy of a "land phantom motor vehicle" (which evokes a wonderful image) which basically means that your car was involved in an accident in which at least one vehicle (not a boat or airplane, hence "land") was implicated, but not actually having contact with any insured vehicle, such as causing or requiring evasion, or was actually involved in impact, but left the scene and cannot be found. Your "old geezer" was basically driving a land phantom motor vehicle, and may have been cited by the police for the way he was driving, but your insurance company is not recognizing that he had any fault in your hitting the curb. This can be argued by saying you were not fully in control of your vehicle. It's analogous to saying it's your fault if you skid on the ice, no matter how much you complain that it is the ice's fault.

I love calling my car a Land-Phantom.

http://cullen-hemphill.com/what-is-a-phantom-vehicle/

Last edited by jtur88; 06-21-2013 at 08:54 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2013, 09:00 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,760 posts, read 14,654,294 times
Reputation: 18529
There's a difference between what the insurance company says and what the law is.

If you were to sue the driver of the other vehicle for negligence (and I don't even know if Texas is a fault or no-fault state) it's possible that the court would conclude that the other driver was negligent and caused the damage to your car. The fact that the carrier is denying coverage isn't necessarily the end of the conversation.

You might want to consult with a Texas attorney who handles this kind of case to evaluate whether it's worth retaining an attorney and suing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2013, 12:39 PM
 
Location: La Jolla, CA
7,284 posts, read 16,687,152 times
Reputation: 11675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet View Post
What would you guys do in such a situation? Besides making old people get off the roads or take classes?
Of course, if a person is old it means they must therefore be at fault, and that the causal factor would have been eliminated if that person had taken a class. That's some good reasoning there.

One could point out that the only vehicle that was damaged was not the one which supposedly "caused" the collision. Obviously since you weren't there, you really don't know exactly what happened, so the blame must automatically lie with someone older.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top