Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-15-2012, 04:27 PM
 
Location: United States
2,497 posts, read 7,477,915 times
Reputation: 2270

Advertisements

Nike will so often do a re-issue of a shoe from say 1982. Lots of companies do things like this. Why do the motor companies not do this? Imagine buying a brand new 1970 Chevelle.SS?! Of course emissions and electronics would be updated but hidden. I see you can sometimes buy an original shell or chassis, but I'm talking mass mfg of a complete showroom classic car. Why Is this not being done?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-15-2012, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Birmingham
11,787 posts, read 17,771,707 times
Reputation: 10120
Safety, emissions, demand all say no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2012, 04:35 PM
 
6,367 posts, read 16,873,875 times
Reputation: 5934
It's been tried

Recreating Classics: Want A Brand New '69 Camaro? - latimes.com (http://www.latimes.com/ktvi-old-new-camaro-cadillac-012110,0,543795.story - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2012, 04:59 PM
 
Location: NJ
17,573 posts, read 46,144,871 times
Reputation: 16279
I imagine it would be very expensive to design and set up assembly of a car that is going to be a one off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2012, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,345,962 times
Reputation: 21891
Doesn't sound like too much fun to me, having someone else build it. I would prefer to build a car from the ground up. The idea of buying all the parts new sounds good to me as well. One of my goals has been to do a frame off restoration of a car some day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2012, 06:01 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,530,849 times
Reputation: 8075
Let's say Chevrolet or Ford decided to begin mass producing their 1960s Pony Cars all over again. The Mustang and Camaro of say 67 or 69 replacing the current Mustang and Camaro. Right off the bat, they would not meet crash safety standards. Everything they'd have to do to meet those standards would increase the vehicle's weight and size. The R&D involved in bringing the old design up to meeting today's crash safety standards would thus drive up the cost of the vehicle. It's a nice dream very few people have realized. A classic pony/muscle car with four wheel disc brakes, modern suspension, and modern engine with modern fuel economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2012, 08:54 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,578 posts, read 81,186,228 times
Reputation: 57818
Wouldn't be the same anyway, without the aroma of unburned fuel coming out the tailpipe, and the throaty roar of a 4 barrel carburetor sucking air.
Better to buy a real classic and restore it with some modern modifications
to make it a little safer, take your chances and enjoy it. If you don't get to fancy with the paint and upholstery you can still do that for less than the price of a new 2012, with the economy tanking classic car prices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2012, 10:03 PM
 
Location: Earth
4,237 posts, read 24,780,703 times
Reputation: 2274
I was under the impression, the "retro" cars from the big 3 were supposed to be the old school cars all over again...but with updates...?

But I'm sure that's now what you were wanting to hear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2012, 10:28 PM
 
1,976 posts, read 6,860,686 times
Reputation: 2559
I am sure I read somewhere that you can buy a Mustang '69 body kit and start building a car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 12:40 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
8,553 posts, read 10,978,234 times
Reputation: 10808
There is a company in Las Vegas that takes old classics, and trashes everything but the body, and interior, and update the rest so the vehicle is technically a new car,with a classic body.
Can't remember the name, but when I advertised my 59 Continental convertible, they called and wanted the car to do this update too it.
They couldn't meet my price so I passed on it.
I would love to see an american classic produced that would be 2012 compliant, with a classic body and interior.
When the "new" tbird came out a few years back, trying to look like a re-done 57 bird, Ford missed the boat.
They should have re-invented the 66 Town Landau and convertibles as their "new" model instead of what they ended up with.
I would take my 66 over that other bird in a second.
I would love to see this one become Ford's 2014 Tbird.

Bob.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top