Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-20-2015, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Taos NM
5,364 posts, read 5,145,684 times
Reputation: 6806

Advertisements

I would think it would be a lot more efficient aerodynamically than to have those two or four jets hanging out on the wing. Would there much aerodynamical advantage to doing this?

Or would it make it too hard to maintain the jets or compromise things like luggage space if they put them in the fuselage?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-20-2015, 11:50 AM
 
Location: Metro Washington DC
15,436 posts, read 25,836,709 times
Reputation: 10460
Yes, it would compromise space needed for other stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2015, 02:22 PM
 
622 posts, read 527,672 times
Reputation: 564
On military aircraft, the engines are buried in the fuselage to minimize radar reflection. Also the wing is much nearer the ground than on commercial aircraft..

Placing the engines underneath the wings on commercial airliners helps to stabilize the wing which would otherwise flutter. It also allows the wing to be made of a much lighter material.

Other factors include reducing the noise in the cabin and of course, ease of maintenance.

In addition, an engine mounted inside either the fuselage, or the wing could cause significant damage to the aircraft if it were to explode.

However, having the engines mounted beneath the wings means that they're more susceptable to foreign object damage such as in the case of a bird strike.

Also, in the event of an emergency landing on water, the engines will increase the load on the wing and could cause it to snap off, possibly hitting the fuselage or even destroying the aircraft.

Fortunately, water landings are few and far between.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2015, 10:01 PM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
16,569 posts, read 15,293,333 times
Reputation: 14591
"Flying with the British airline company BOAC, the De Havilland DH-106 Comet 1 became the world's first passenger jet aircraft in May 1952. Note the unique placement of the jet engines inside the wings; a detail on commercial aircraft only seen elsewhere* on the Tupolev 104 (Tu-104)”

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2015, 05:42 AM
 
622 posts, read 527,672 times
Reputation: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyRider View Post
"Flying with the British airline company BOAC, the De Havilland DH-106 Comet 1 became the world's first passenger jet aircraft in May 1952. Note the unique placement of the jet engines inside the wings; a detail on commercial aircraft only seen elsewhere* on the Tupolev 104 (Tu-104)”
Those were the days.....

But many passengers died in the 26 hull loss accidents that occurred in the Comet before it was discovered that fatigue cracks in the corners of the windows could lead to in-flight breakup: http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/...rc/rm/3248.pdf

Scary stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2015, 06:49 AM
 
Location: Limbo
6,512 posts, read 7,555,715 times
Reputation: 6319
A striking aircraft, but technically very flawed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2015, 07:04 AM
 
Location: SW OK (AZ Native)
24,313 posts, read 13,167,505 times
Reputation: 10572
Not all military aircraft bury their engines. In the case of a single-engine fighter it makes sense, same for a two-engine fighter. The high-bypass turbofans of today are too large in diameter to place inside; an example is the A-10, which has external engines for a number of reasons, including frontal area of the fan. Others over the years: B-45, B-47, B-52, B-58, S-3, all cargo jets, even the XB-70 and B-1 have podded engines.

There are disadvantages to internal engines, including maintenance, and as previously mentioned if one engine cuts loose it often takes the other(s) with it if they're mounted in close proximity (my pilot training base lost a T-38 in that scenario).

Stealth demands internally-mounted engines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2015, 08:25 AM
 
Location: Denver, CO
1,421 posts, read 1,638,384 times
Reputation: 1751
The "jet" turbine itself doesn't create a lot of thrust. Most of the thrust of a modern airliner comes from the fan in front of the turbine. These fans are, on long haul aircraft well over 9' in diameter. There's simply no space.

You can see the size of the fan in relation to the actual turbine itself below.

Military planes use much much smaller fans that are designed for much higher speeds that are much less fuel efficient.

777 GE-90 Engine




F22 Raptor Turbine (P&W YF-119)

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2015, 12:48 PM
 
Location: Taos NM
5,364 posts, read 5,145,684 times
Reputation: 6806
Thanks for the info guys! It was just something I had wondered when I looked at commercial planes, I figured there had to be an answer, I just didn't know why.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2015, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Texas Hill Country
23,652 posts, read 14,019,839 times
Reputation: 18861
Internal engines can be a real problem if one has to make a belly landing. In one of the early test flights of the first (and surviving) XB-70, the gear failed to lower but a belly landing was out of the question due to engine placement. That problem was solved by one of the pilots crawling back into the guts and repairing the circuit.

Keep in mind that with many military jets, one has an ejection seat as an alternative.

Watch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCeI4uOmRU
to see how important internal cargo space is considered for an airliner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top